Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 16 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Eupterote sp --Vengolis 02:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stachytarpheta jamaicensis --Vengolis 02:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ocimum tenuiflorum --Vengolis 02:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tagiades litigiosa --Vengolis 02:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Petersberg of the castle ruin Geiersberg, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. FP? PumpkinSky 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Petersberg of the church Saint Nicholas and the monastery of the Dominicans on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. FP? PumpkinSky 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City parish church Saint Bartholomew, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle ruin on Petersberg #18, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Historistic building on Lange Gasse #18, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Hood with Sandy Glacier (center) from Bald Mountain --Wsiegmund 22:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fishing boat, evening light, Chalkida, Greece.--Jebulon 20:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of Scheepvaarthuis, Amsterdam. --C messier 19:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rijksmuseum from Museumplein, Amsterdam. --C messier 19:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination DC3 (SE-CFP) at Skå airfield, Stockholm County. --ArildV 18:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abandoned coastal artillery bunker in Landsort, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 18:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City block "Ortdrivaren" in Kiruna, Sweden. Built 1961. Architect Ralph Erskine. --ArildV 18:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. But why only f/5.6? --XRay 18:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC) No particular reason, I think I was using f/5.6 for a different images and forgot to change. The lens is slightly sharper at f/8 but not a big difference.--ArildV 19:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination монастир оо.Василіан, Львів, Хмельницького Б., 36 --Мирослав Видрак 15:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry. Sky overexposed, perspective correction necessary, CAs, geo location missing, EXIF data missing. But I like the composition. -- XRay 17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New York City, Penn Station --Ralf Roletschek 14:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Union Station (Washington, D.C.) --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Normally I don't like extreme short lenses and panoramas but this image looks very good -- Spurzem 16:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Union Station (Washington, D.C.) --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toshihiro Suzuki at the Suzuki press conference, IAA 2017 --MB-one 13:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi A3 e-tron an einer Ladestation in Maastricht --Berthold Werner 12:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Biosphäre Montreal --Ralf Roletschek 12:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Beutiful photo, quality just ok.--ArildV 18:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardur lighthouse, Island --Ralf Roletschek 12:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dolbadarn Castle, Wales --Llywelyn2000 09:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Masum-al-hasan 11:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maastricht, Vrijthof 46, Theater --Berthold Werner 07:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Günzburg, Frauenkirche --Berthold Werner 07:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Kürenzer Schlösschen --Berthold Werner 07:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the building at 12 rue Saint-Julien in Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Saint Michael Church in Cordes-sur-Ciel, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belfry at the Saint Catherine Church of Penne, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling of the church of St. James in Bad Kissingen --Ermell 07:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Banz Monastery --Ermell 07:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Good quality, IMO. I consider it perfectly valid to have areas of blackness in a night picture. -- Ikan Kekek 23:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling of St. Bartholomew church in Knetzgau --Ermell 07:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Power station Strullendorf downstream. --Ermell 07:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Storhofthi, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Comment Some dust in the middle. See annotation.--Ermell 07:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 16:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Storhofthi, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Comment Some dust in the middle. See annotation.--Ermell 07:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel in Puerto Natales, Chile --Poco a poco 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Gorgeous! Very good quality. Perhaps FPC? -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arabic Water Gate, Ágreda, Spain --Poco a poco 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, Baltra Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Nevytsky Castle, Ukraine by User:SvartKat.--Aeou 06:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Malaniuka Square. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 06:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Malaniuka Square. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 06:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 7 Malaniuka Square. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 06:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oud Ade-NL, windmill (de Vrouw Vennemolen) with catholic church in the background --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Right side is leaning in Poco a poco 06:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for no promotion, but I think the perspective correction is a relative small error. I have seen another more serious mistake and I need some time for a new version --Michielverbeek 12:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Done New version, but I have an unknown upload error --Michielverbeek 15:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Oud Ade-NL, windmill (de Vrouw Vennemolen) with catholic church in the background --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gouda-NL, street view (the Lange Tiendeweg) with cheese shop and monumental house ('t Grendeltje) --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Perhaps FP? -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for compliment, I think it is a surprising composition. However I was even doubting if it would be a Q1; monumental house in background looks a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 07:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leiden-NL, townhall and bridge (de Koornbrug) --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leiden-NL, town gate: de Zijlpoort --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 06:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leiden, view to the Apothekersdijk --Michielverbeek 06:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 06:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of Hammam Jerda, Medina of Oujda, Morocco. By User:Farajiibrahim --Reda benkhadra 00:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oversharpened.Sorry. --Ermell 07:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jorsand, Uthörn, Lister Tief im Norden von Sylt --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Scottish Life Insurance Building. Montreal, Canada. --ArildV 05:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Crop on the extreme right, with someone's elbow, is a little distracting, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 18:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Place d'Armes in Montreal, Canada. --ArildV 05:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Certainly a well-made photo, but why does the right-hand tower of the Cathedral look flat? Also, there's a tiny speck to the right of the top of that tower. I removed a tiny dust spot from the images. I think its because of the wide-angle lens and some perspective correction. Thank you for reviews.--ArildV 18:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hawa Khana, Puthia, Rajshahi --Masum-al-hasan 04:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Nice composition but unfortunately noisy, not very sharp and overexposed at the bottom --Moroder 07:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination post mill (miniature mill on a 1:4 scale) built for education and fully functioning; Langerwisch, state Brandenburg, Germany --YvoBentele 18:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Sky is a quiet noisy, please remove some spots in the sky, quality might be high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Done spots are removed, noise is better like that? --YvoBentele 06:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC) A weak support --Michielverbeek 06:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Policemen of Mounted Police Unit of Kolkata Police return after an early morning exercise at Kolkata Maidan. --Dey.sandip 08:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Nikhil B 08:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carlos Sadness in concert at Monopol Music Festival in 2017. --Santamarcanda 00:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Too unsharp IMO. Sorry. --Ermell 07:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Byron, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 17:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion QuestionFoP relevance? How old is it?--Peulle 17:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Peulle Maybe you could have a little look by yourself before asking ? The name of the sculptor, Alexandre Falguière, is visible on the pediment. This French sculptor died in 1900...--Jebulon 18:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Support OK. --C messier 19:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Train station building: Vokzalnaya st, 13, Kislovodsk, Stavropol krai --Nino Verde 09:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Cascading staircase": Dzerjinskogo street, Kislovodsk, Stavropol krai --Nino Verde 07:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The shadows are a bit too dark but the technical quality is o.k. --Ermell 07:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hypholoma fasciculare, Yellow Sulphur Tuft mushrooms --Stu's Images 19:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 14:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway station "Likhobory" in Moscow, Russia --Shansov.net 13:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment This is barely 4 Mpix, please upload a larger version. --C messier 16:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Done by C messier's request --Shansov.net 00:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Weak support It's not really bigger, also there is some clipping in the clouds, but IMHO acceptable. --C messier 19:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Small (Semicircular) Palace 5099.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Small (Semicircular) Palace, Orekhovo-Borisovo Northern, southern suburbs, Moscow --AlixSaz 12:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Can you fix perspective? --Cvmontuy 12:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Correction possible. What is the drawback there? Explain? --AlixSaz 19:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC),
- Comment Proper perspective is one requirement for QI but exceptions are accepted, lets discuss
- Comment Correction possible. What is the drawback there? Explain? --AlixSaz 19:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC),
- Oppose Dramatically oversharpened, CA. Perspective correction needed. --Nino Verde 05:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose--Peulle 06:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others, + unfortunate crop of the lantern.--Jebulon 01:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Milseburg (talk) 13:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Мыс_и_маяк_Таран._Калининградская_область._Николай_Ягунов.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Taran Lighthouse (former Brüsterort) in Kalinigrad Oblast. By User:Nyagunov — Niklitov 19:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Sharpness is ok, but colors too enhanced IMO. Can you fix it? Tournasol7 21:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Good evening, Tournasol7! It's a matter of taste. At your discretion! — Niklitov 21:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not agree, because the colors aren't natural. However let others say. Please discuss, Tournasol7 22:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpened, oversaturated, bright parts burned out. --Nino Verde 05:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Note that it's probably a scanned film positive, not a digital photo, so high saturation is in line with "film positive" style. --Shansov.net 16:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Yep, checked info. It is scanned film positive photo. But anyway, i'm not sure that it conforms to QI standards --Nino Verde 16:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Nino Verde --Cvmontuy 21:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Question - Why is it a problem to upload a scan of a vivid color photo? -- Ikan Kekek 00:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It shouldn't be, really, but given the lack of metadata, how would we know? Also: if someone takes a really god photo/scan of a bad photo, does that make the end result a good image? This is very meta, but ...--Peulle 09:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Isn't the lack of metadata inherent to the fact that this is a scan of a printed photo? I don't see why that should be a reason to reject it. Please explain. I'm inclined to support. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It shouldn't be, really, but given the lack of metadata, how would we know? Also: if someone takes a really god photo/scan of a bad photo, does that make the end result a good image? This is very meta, but ...--Peulle 09:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --PumpkinSky 23:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
File:South-block NDLS 05092014.jpg
[edit]- Nomination South Block in New Delhi--Nikhil B 08:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Rather small and the composition isn´t convincing me. Too much sky. --Milseburg 13:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Too agressive noise reduction, unnatural colors. --Nino Verde 05:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Not high enough quality considering the small size, IMO.--Peulle 10:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --PumpkinSky 23:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Pic_St_Mury_Vallée_Grésivaudan.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Grésivaudan Valley seen from the Pic Saint-Mury --MirandaAdramin 13:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Aeou 17:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive size and imaging quality. But the stitch error on the left (see note) should be corrected. The orientation of the horizon does not seem to be right. It is bulging towards the center. --Milseburg 13:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done I uploaded a new version, larger. I fixed the horizon problem and fought some hours with the stitching control points without completely winning. Milseburg, could you please have a look ? Thanks. --MirandaAdramin 14:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- The big stitching error is gone, a little one remains at the same place, visible as an step. In my eyes a QI-panorama needs a perfect stitching, especially on the horizon and even when it´s large. Enough reviewers seem to have a lower claim. The alignment is ok for QI. Maybe the lower limit of the clouds is really lower to the right side.--Milseburg (talk) 11:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Too noisy, can be corrected --Nino Verde 06:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nino Verde, maybe the larger size will convince you. I learnt photography with films and reduce the noise always makes me think of a bulldozer ;-) --MirandaAdramin 14:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- MirandaAdramin, i've checked at full size. The work itself is really nice and noise is visible on sky only. Thus my oppose is weak. --Nino Verde 16:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nino Verde, maybe the larger size will convince you. I learnt photography with films and reduce the noise always makes me think of a bulldozer ;-) --MirandaAdramin 14:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Awesome landscape --Billy69150 12:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support QI --Palauenc05 22:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! --Tournasol7 22:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support - This is nowhere near a borderline case to me: a huge panorama with a bit of grain/noise in the background. -- Ikan Kekek 00:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon 01:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Ikan Kekek 00:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Chapelle_de_la_Vieille_Charité_Marseille_2017.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Vieille Charité (Chapelle et hospice). By User:Alexrk2 --Marianne Casamance 15:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --XRay 16:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm very sorry to interfere, but in full resolution I see some CAs, much of noise but only little of sharpness. --PtrQs 21:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per PtrQs, in spite of the fact that a good counterargument is that it's a large file. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support I don't understand why ISO 1600 but it is a very interesting composition and sharpness is O.K. for me. -- Spurzem 07:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 22:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per PtrQs Poco a poco 11:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Left part of image is completely blurred (and noisy). --Shansov.net 18:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Shansov PumpkinSky 23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose with opposers.--Jebulon 01:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline? --PumpkinSky 23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)