Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 18 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Venki_Ramakrishnan.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Venki Ramakrishnan (by Royal Society uploader) --Mydreamsparrow 04:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:45, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, the photographer is not a wikipedian, see guidelines: "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status." --Moroder 06:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. The author has an account on Commons, so what's wrong about it? --A.Savin 01:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @A.Savin: Who is the photographer? I might be wrong, but I understand that only the uploader has an account --Moroder 01:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Indeed, I missed the info that the "Royal Society uploader" is only a technical account to upload OTRS-released stuff from an external source;  Oppose then, not a Wikimedian's work. --A.Savin 01:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not eligible.--Peulle 07:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-02-13_Birke_Bull-Bischoff_(Bundestagsprojekt_2020)_by_Sandro_Halank–2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Birke Bull-Bischoff, Die Linke --Sandro Halank 19:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose DOF a bit too small. Take an example from your photos of Anja Weisgerber or Caren Lay. --KaiBorgeest 22:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  SupportI disagree. DOF more then enough. --Stepro 11:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Stepro. -- Ikan Kekek 09:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per supporters, DOF good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 13:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 13:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Rotes_Schloss_in_Weimar_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Windows of the Rotes Schloss at Markt 15 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 18:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Well composed. But it looks very noisy in the dark areas of the windows. And the image is very short of detail due to intense noise reduction. --Augustgeyler 18:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but it looks ok for me. --Tournasol7 09:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Solid QI to me. Mild noise is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 05:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The noise in the windows is not excessive. Regarding the lack of details on the wall I agree that a soft look due to excessive noise reduction would be very bad, but here it seems that the plastering (? Putz) is just smooth itself. --Aristeas 08:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Aristeas --Kritzolina 08:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality --Sandro Halank 19:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)