Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/07/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 23rd, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Lithuania russavia (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Lithuania russavia (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF states the copyright holder is (C) 2011 Subaru Australia, but NRMA is the Flickr account holder. The NRMA is not able to relicence content it is not the copyright holder of russavia (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also, I'll change the template into {{Copyvio}}.--FAEP (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No prob, will delete russavia (talk) 16:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicat of File:Bw331-Generalleutnant.png Flor!an (talk) 21:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously not own work, since it is French TV logo. Moreover, it is probably copyrighted. Vanja / Вања (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an image from the Dallas Morning News. No evidence is provided that it is licensed under Creative Commons. Ahecht (talk) 01:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does not hold the copyright to this image. Copyright is claimed on the author's website, [1]. I emailed the author to ask if they are willing to release this under a Wikimedia-friendly license, but so far no response. She had previously stated that she was ok with a Wikimedia-only permission, which is not enough for use here. VQuakr (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious cropped copyvio from http://awongllcorsetti.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside scope: not really useful in the Wikimedia projects. Eleassar (t/p) 07:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside scope: too low quality. Eleassar (t/p) 07:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Yes, low quality. Delete when and if a better quality image of the same subject comes along. Until then, it does have some educational value, even if it's not useful in a published article. — Ipoellet (talkf.k.a. Werewombat 22:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside scope: too low quality. Eleassar (t/p) 07:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Yes, low quality. Delete when and if a better quality image of the same subject comes along. Until then, it does have some educational value, even if it's not useful in a published article. — Ipoellet (talkf.k.a. Werewombat 22:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per lpoellet -Pete F (talk) 18:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside scope: too low quality. Eleassar (t/p) 07:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Yes, low quality. Delete when and if a better quality image of the same subject comes along. Until then, it does have some educational value, even if it's not useful in a published article. — Ipoellet (talkf.k.a. Werewombat 22:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside the scope: too low quality. Eleassar (t/p) 07:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside the scope: too low quality. Eleassar (t/p) 08:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also:
--Eleassar (t/p) 08:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless - no use ever on Wikimedia - Youreallycan (talk) 08:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WORTHLESS - NO USE EVER ON WIKIMEDIA PROJECTS - Youreallycan (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless - no educational use at all Youreallycan (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless - no educational use at all Youreallycan (talk) 08:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless - no educational use at all Youreallycan (talk) 08:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 10:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: photos of oneself or his friends. Eleassar (t/p) 10:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image lacks factual accuracy and varies from the data given in the references. Ἀλέξανδρος ὁ Μέγας (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original is not a 2-dimensional, but a 3-dimensional work. Thereby, PD-Art is not applicable. The photo may be copyrighted by the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-educational, out of scope (and borderline copyvio because of the Nobel Prize medal). Mormegil (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improper license: has copyright symbol at bottom of graphic image; sheet music Deanlaw (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oeuvre d'art de 1968, NO FOP in France Havang(nl) (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-free creative work, no evidence uploader has permission of actual artist (logo is marked "1924" so it is not PD-old). If agreement that it's not free, transwiki to en.wp, where fair-use is allowed and this image has a use that complies with that. DMacks (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of existing file File:Roemer61.jpg Deanlaw (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Bangalore Butterfly Park IMG 0223.JPG.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in India for two-dimensional works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. delete it.--Manojk (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture, not in use, personality rights Catfisheye (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality including {{BadJPG}} and non-standard angles; replaced by File:APTES.svg. Leyo 15:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Out of focus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i think it's not a valid reson :). the plant is in focus--Manojk (talk) 15:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-old (Anders Kappel is still alive) and not FoP (since indoors). Lokal_Profil 16:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim seems dubious at least... It's not because one says "It's PD, unless someone claims else" that this is true. Pleclown (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Site offers a collection of pictures, but doesn't indicate the name of the photographer, the date or any other information. Furthermore, the description page offers this page as gallery, without any copyright status information. When manually going two levels up, we are on this page with the following statement: “ All images on this site are believed to be in the public domain. Anyone wishing to challenge that assumption should contact the webmaster. ”. Even if Pleclown doesn't represent accurately the site editor's intent (the disclaimer uses a more careful wording, to be believed to, there is no details on the checks made), it clearly doesn't meet the Wikimedia Commons requirements. --Dereckson (talk) 20:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, scan of book cover, no OTRS ticket attached Poupou l'quourouce (talk) 21:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2026565448/luna-nova-a-celebration-of-olivier-messiaen/posts/260469 so it needs evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio from http://www.nnvolley.ru/sites/default/files/players/2925.JPG Andrey1984 (talk) 21:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio from http://www.fivb.org/visasp/ShowImage.aspx?No=201259767&maxsize=500 Andrey1984 (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused joke photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_needing_categories_as_of_12_May_2013 Mjrmtg (talk) 23:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borrado rápido Dverab (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado Rapido hitotsume 03:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free information board; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence this would be a free work. Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free works.

Eleassar (t/p) 11:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obs.: uncategorized files recently added by me to this category. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier - Baghdad.jpg apparently in scope of COM:FOP#Iraq = ✘. Obs.: File:Unknownsoldier.png in this category is copyvio.

Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexander Lobov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used + multiple copyright issues involved: All files related to decorations/diplomas/awards/medals/etc. for a company named "TeleTrade".

Gunnex (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Facu Mateo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaby.vinhal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harrywen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt that all these logos are the own work by the uploader as stated.

JuTa 17:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mak mo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, private stuff

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos uploaded by sockpuppets of Cyperuspapyrus

[edit]

Cyperuspapyrus is a copyright violator[2] and a multiple account abuser[3]. As you can see his all uploads from the main account were copyvios uploaded under false self made claim. He is stealing many photos from the facebook profiles like File:Benjamin_Adegbuyi.jpg, so all his uploads are in medium resolution and without EXIF metadata. --Oleola (talk) 23:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WRB Project design submissions

[edit]

Probable copyright infringement. The nominated files are all submissions by private proposers in a public art design competition sponsored by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The images were sourced from Flickr and passed Flickr review with CC-BY-2.0; however the images were posted to Flickr by ODOT, not by the original creators of the designs. No evidence is provided in either the file descriptions or the Flickr source pages that the original authors released them under the CC license, nor that they authorized ODOT to do so. In fact, it would be highly unusual for the authors to have freely licensed such designs, except that (maybe) the competition winner may have been required to do so. However, again, there's no evidence that this was done (nor do I know which, if any, of these designs actually won). — Ipoellet (talkf.k.a. Werewombat 07:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even though this image is from NASA, it is wildly misleading. Our Galaxy is 100,0000 light years across, this image is 1325 pixels across. So, a sphere 300 light years across would be about 3-4 pixels across -- smaller than the dot representing the sun. Geo Swan (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per darkweasel94's comment and the nominator's withdrawal whym (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copia duplicada MXMO (talk) 05:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was taken by my IHSS worker, and modified by Encyclopedia Dramatica user Sirkillsalot. I, the subject of the image and its uploader, am not able to release this image with a free license because I did not create it, nor did I modify it (the pony purpling was done by Sirkillsalot, who has left ED) 74.46.252.247 03:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete duplicated image. MXMO (talk) 05:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no notability Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright, "all rights reserved" burned into image. Facebook link given as "licensing information" is dead 67.230.145.144 13:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nolonger needed - there could be a problem because concact informations are included and public! :( Michael Reschke (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion. 92.231.115.53 21:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

André Devambez (1867-1944), is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 82.124.58.159 21:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the clock is dated to MM/2000. The previous design is visible at [4]. Eleassar (t/p) 09:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 09:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside scope: too low quality, not really useful. Eleassar (t/p) 07:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted one, kept other FASTILY 09:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no verifiable license on picasa. Just this note on the camera metadata: "COPYRIGHT, 2006". Of course this image dates to 2013 but we we still need a verifiable license. Can Commons keep this image? Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, Flinfo states it is cc-by-3.0: [5].--Edelseider (talk) 11:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, whether cc-licensed or not, it is PD-old - MPF (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only if you crop the border away. darkweasel94 21:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I imagine its pd-old but still when one cannot see the license, it is a problem if the borders are not cropped out. Once the borders are cropped out and the license changed to pd-old, then this image can be kept. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I withdraw this DR. I can see the picasa license today strangely and its DR "cc by 3.0 generic." Image is passed by me. Please close this DR as keep. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As nominator has withdrawn DR and found legitimate source. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no verifiable license on picasa. Just this note on the camera metadata: "COPYRIGHT, 2006". Of course this image dates to 2013 but we we still need a verifiable license. Can Commons keep this image? Leoboudv (talk) 08:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, Flinfo states it is cc-by-3.0: [6].--Edelseider (talk) 11:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, whether with or without any cc license, it is still PD-old - MPF (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only if you crop away the border. darkweasel94 20:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: It would help if someone could state the identity of this photo but I imagine its pd-old but still when one cannot see the license, it is a problem if the borders are not cropped out. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I withdraw this DR. I can see the picasa license today and its cc by 3.0 generic. Image is passed by me. May I suggest that the border be cropped away however? --Leoboudv (talk) 04:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As nominator has withdrawn DR and found legitimate source. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Estonia.

russavia (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll talk to the authors of this monument. It may take some time (4 different authors + summer). Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sternfeld referred to this page, where it is said: "use of the figure is free to everyone [---] Asking permission is not necessary." and "when making profit from using it, then it is recommended to give some to charity...". Kruusamägi (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all. kaitseministeerium.ee is official site of Estonian Ministery of Defence, who was subscriber and is owner of the statue. The mentioned position is (by ministery of defence) coordinated with all authors of the statue. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment So I guess that this page that I referred before should settle it and therefor this deletion request could now be closed down. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved apparently FASTILY 09:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that these architectural works would be public domain (i.e. the author died before 1945). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia.

Eleassar (t/p) 14:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope or not free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.

Eleassar (t/p) 08:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Japan Amateur Boxing Federation has banned commercial use of portrait rights of their registered boxers since July 2013.[7] We can not now no longer use the photos of Japanese amateur boxers under a CC-BY-2.0 license or any other license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. Akira Kouchiyama 09:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC), correction --Akira Kouchiyama 01:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can they do that retroactively? darkweasel94 16:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In July 2013, they added detailed explanation to its original rules and regulations that have been applied for many years. The original rules are here.[8] Both original and detailed rules prohibit commercial use of the images of the registered boxers and officers. The federation manages their portrait rights. Maybe this is the same case as Japan Professional Football League. --Akira Kouchiyama 01:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds to me like a non-copyright restriction. darkweasel94 04:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for giving me the appropriate link. Please see also Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Japan for what I refer to as "portrait rights". --Akira Kouchiyama 10:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There doesn't appear to be anything wrong with this. Not only do we ignore retroactive copyright restrictions, but also the people depicted in this photo are too small to be identifiable FASTILY 19:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es handelt sich auf diesem Bild um Mike Pickering und nicht um Adrian Huge. Bild wird mit richtigem Namen erneut hochgeladen. Schorle (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

siehe hier: File:Mike Pickering 01.JPG--Schorle (talk) 19:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 19:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect is inconsistent with the naming scheme adopted in Wikipedia:Route_diagram_template/Catalog_of_pictograms/junctions/crossings. I am preparing to upload an icon that fits the name. Mahir256 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Uploaded. Useddenim (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: already uploaded FASTILY 19:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original is not a 2-dimensional, but a 3-dimensional work. Thereby, PD-Art is not applicable. The photo may be copyrighted by the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Many works from the National Gallery of Art in Washington are open access. This file should not be deleted https://images.nga.gov/en/page/openaccess.html Xcia0069 (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You might be correct, if this photo is indeed taken from NGA's open access colletion. However, this is still unproven due to the meaningless source-entry. You need to provide the exact subpage/site where this image is shown/offered on the nga server. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing verifiable source FASTILY 19:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like professional work (?), summary has "Copyright 2010 Janet Jackson", only contribution of uploader - not sure here, but should be further checked GermanJoe (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this would also involve File:Janet_Jackson_2,_2010.jpg as derivative. GermanJoe (talk) 14:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 19:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too complex for PD-textlogo //  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 23 July 2013 20:09 (UTC) 20:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Software isn't always licensed the same way as its artwork. I've tagged the file npd for now FASTILY 19:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture shows an copyrightet ad. It does not fall under the "Freedom of Panorama", because it isn't a "building" or a "permanently situated in a public place", like stated in the for the united kingdom legally binding "Designs and Patents Act" http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/62 This also concerns other pictures of the Category:Buses with advertisement in the United Kingdom. CennoxX (talk) 12:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procedural keep. Not every image in Category:Buses with advertisement in the United Kingdom is the same as this one, so lumping in that whole category in with this nomination is inappropriate. If the nominator has an issue with the copyright status of images of buses in the UK that have adverts, he needs to make a proper list of the images he thinks need to be deleted, or at least better define the criteria by which they should be selected for deletion. I for one would disagree that images like this for example wouldn't be considered Commons:De minimis. For closer images, I would also disagree that they all need to be deleted. Many are crops, so if image like the one just linked is fine, then so could those be, if restored to original size. Others might be able to be kept if the copyrighted portion is blurred out, as happened in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pride & Prejudice London Bus.jpg (note that that image does not qualify for inclusion in Category:Buses with advertisement in the United Kingdom because the advert is only in a standard panel). It can also be argued that some do not meet the threshold of originality, such as this. Some of them might not even be copyrighted, because the 'advert' is just text. Ultra7 (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having looked through them all now, I can say for certain that most of the images in that category have no issue at all, either because there is no copyrightable element at all (ie, no creative work), or where there is, it is small enough to qualify as de minimis. There are some where there is an artistic work that fills a good portion of the image, but as said, most of these can be dealt with by blurring the art work element. I'd say at most, there's maybe 10 images where there'd be no point in keeping them even after blurring. Therefore, the only way this DR can proceed is if we know for certain precisely which images are being proposed for deletion first, and therefore what corrective action, if any, is needed on those. But none of that can happen if they are deleted en masse (note that some of them may not be recoverable even as blurred images if deleted, as some are from flickr where licenses can change, and some are from a Commons user who I think has retired). Ultra7 (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Copyvio, no FOP. To me, this deletion request reads as though it is specifically about the Despicable Me bus, with only an incidental comment about the broader category. I certainly agre with Ultra7 that one or more additional deletion requests should be done if any of the other files in the category are to be deleted. — Ipoellet (talkf.k.a. Werewombat 22:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my vague deletion request, I meant it like Ipoellet mentioned.--CennoxX (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK then, in that case, for the record I'm fine with deleteing this single image, because it wouldn't show anything of educational value even if the artwork was blurred. I'm fine with you nominating any of the others, as long as you make a specific list - it would be very hard to discuss any copyright issues they have without such a list (the issues being de minimis, pd-text, what classes as a creative work, what can be fixed by blurring, etc). Ultra7 (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: derivatives of non-free works are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 19:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, under copyright / Logo protégé par le droit d'auteur Trizek from FR 15:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd text FASTILY 19:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 00:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 11:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does this apply for {{PD-old}} or similar? JuTa 18:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Likely yes. PD in the US because pre-1923, and probably an anonymous work though we can't be entirely sure - that would make it PD in the EU as well. darkweasel94 19:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • This postcard was sent in 1913 and the picture was taken prior. There is no copyright problem Marc Pilot 18:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 19:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gravestones in Denmark above TOO

[edit]

Per the village pump discussion on "Are gravestones ( tombstones ) works?", I would like to nominate the following photographs from Category:Gravestones in Denmark:

The gravestones are on a public space (graveyards in Denmark are public accessible, albeit some with opening hours), are not buildings so not covered by FOP and Denmark doesn't have special protection of utilitarian objects (if gravestones should be considered such). Copyright in Denmark lasts 70 full calendar years PMA, so within reason I have nominated all gravestones that I consider to be above TOO, and created 95 years previously or later (I have allowed for the author of the stones to live another 25 year since making them under COM:PCP. Given we are in 2013, that would make authors death year 1942 (latest) and the stones would be created no later than 1917. I have also assumed that the gravestones are made at the first year listed on them. The gravestones marked * the parts containing artistic merit, could arguably considered to be de minimis, but I have included them to give more opportunity for discussion. See also Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen). --heb [T C E] 10:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only delete those for which the threshold of originality is exceeded. IMO, some of the photos don't show "works" at all, for example File:Lasse_Winsløw_(gravestone).jpg could have been created by an independent and does not show enough creativity of the author to be a "work". I'm not sure if any of gravestones above are "works". Nillerdk (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Won't most tombstones be anonymous works, protected only for 70 years from when they are made accessible to the public? That would make the P. W. Heiberg one okay by age. And while I am inclined to agree with Niller that the Lasse Winsløw one is probably below the threshold, I don't think any of the rest are ok. Peter Alberti (talk) 19:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Peter, as always you bring up good points. Now that you mention it, I am quite sure, that most - if not all - of the tombstones are indeed anonymous works, which means it's only 70 full calendar years (following the year they where made accessible to the public). --heb [T C E] 07:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment May I suggest that if any are deleted, that the opportunity be given to (where possible) crop the photo to remove or make de-minimis any copyrightable aspect, so as not to be too disruptive to any projects using the image (many are in use). --Tony Wills (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep File:Peter Wilken Heiberg (grave).jpg. It's in the public domain in the United States as {{PD-1923}}. Also, most if not all tombstones are presumably anonymous works, so {{Anonymous-EU}} appears to work in Denmark.
  •  Neutral File:Esbjerg War Cemetery Unknown British airman.jpg The man worked for the Royal Air Force. Is the symbol above the text a work by the British government? If so, {{PD-UKGov}} applies.
  •  Neutral File:Lasse Winsløw (gravestone).jpg You see very little of the man on the cross. I'm not convinced that what you see of the artwork is above the threshold of originality.
  •  Delete the rest. The Danish copyright presumably expires 70 years after the stones were erected whereas the US copyright expires 95 years after the stones were erected (pre-1978, i.e. published) or presumably 120 years after they were created (post-1977, i.e. unpublished and presumably anonymous). I assume that most stones were both made and erected either during the year the person died or during the following year (if there was no time for making the stone before then). --Stefan4 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The man needed a stone when he died in 1920. In Sweden, the inscription is sometimes extended whenever someone else dies, and then the same stone is used. However, I don't know whether this always is the case or whether a new stone might be made in some cases. Also, I don't know whether this is the case in other countries. I think that it is often safe to assume that gravestones were made shortly (i.e. within a few months) after the death of the first person in the grave, but there might be exceptions. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: One kept as apparently ok, rest deleted as derivatives of non-free works, which are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 19:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see the educational value of this shonky Photoshopped home-made porn. — Scott talk 17:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (DW/Mattbuck): The category tree is messed up - 217.255.158.129 07:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, thanks, I'm going to recategorize it there. However, the file proposed here still seems of sufficiently high quality to be usable. darkweasel94 09:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What exact educational purpose do you see this weird and amateurish collage of a urinating penis fitting? — Scott talk 10:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you think it's a collage, or digitally manipulated? I could see it used to illustrate urination, but if you're right about the digital manipulation, perhaps there really is none. darkweasel94 10:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at the picture. It's the same penis three times, coarsely cut out and glued together. It's just a guy peeing and I would never call this porn, but the quality is really not great. --84.75.61.249 10:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is a fairly high-quality picture showing urination, and the only one that shows it at different stages. Sure, I think it would be more useful if instead of overlapped it were three separate photographs next to each other, but it's still valuable as it is. I have asked the uploader to upload the files that constitute the collage if they have them. Handcuffed (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No, this is crap COM:PORN. Tons of pissing and this particular montage does not add anything new to existing images. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no clear consensus to delete FASTILY 06:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]