Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/10

COM:TOYS DanielPenfield (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused at the claim of "COM:TOYS". This appears to be an image of a particular set of goggles which, while they can be used as a toy, don't really appear to have anything above COM:TOO in their shape. The only real unique thing is the inclusion of the reflector in the middle, but that would seem to be a utilitarian thing rather than a toy; "drunk driving glasses" work in a similar way. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you certain that Vango Toys, the marketer and manufacturer of The #UpsideDownChallenge Game, isn't going to claim infringement on anyone using this image? Do you think they're not going to be aggrieved over the unauthorized use of their #UpsideDownChallenge logo? Are you certain that Phaidon Press, Inc, the publisher of Exploring the Elements: A Complete Guide to the Periodic Table, the book whose cover appears behind the goggles isn't going to feel their book cover design is being infringed? In what Wikimedia project could this poorly-composed image be used? What was the point in uploading a photo that mixes two products from two different companies and pretends that those two companies aren't going to sic their lawyers on Wikimedia? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 14:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Goggles themselves might be OK, but IMO rather strangely composed image with possible COM:DW problems. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by UCinternational as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://x.com/fujihen/status/1848662636772397280 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GafE3qebUAAZBlB?format=jpg&name=large
Converted to regular DR as uploader claims to have sent permission from photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for your action. I will continue with the necessary procedures.SeijiFujii (talk) 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ticket:2024111010006338 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 00:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader explained at SVWP that they found the image on the internet, looks like official SVT footage, no indication the image was ever released under free license Tournesol (talk) 10:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

この画像は1980年5月26日に帝国ホテル富士の間で行われた明治大学創立100周年記念講演会の一場面です（撮影者は後藤清一）。もし帝国ホテルや明治大学、あるいは後藤清一氏の公開許可が得られていないのであれば削除すべきものと考えます。 ブルーメンタール (talk) 11:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

「原典」欄にソースのリンクを貼っていますが、ライセンス(CC BY)の下に、再利用可能な画像として大学側が公示しているもののひとつであると認識しています。

認識齟齬がありましたらご指摘下さい。

※CC BY：原作者のクレジット（氏名、作品タイトルなど）を表示することを主な条件とし、改変はもちろん、営利目的での二次利用も許可される最も自由度の高いCCライセンス

https://m-archives.meiji.jp/content/detail/HI00000627

https://m-archives.meiji.jp/guide#secondaryuse

以下、大学側記載内容ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

明治大学史資料センター資料

ライセンス表示に従いご利用ください。

画像データは当サイトからご利用ください。

利用条件

明治大学史資料センター所蔵資料であることを明示してください。

データの改変等を行った場合はその旨を明示してください。

公序良俗に反する利用は行わないでください。

著作権以外の権利（著作者人格権、著作隣接権、肖像権、パブリシティ権、プライバシー権、商標権等）にも留意し、関連法令を遵守してください。

二次利用による成果物がある場合は本学に1部ご寄贈ください。

メタデータの二次利用条件について

明治大学デジタルアーカイブで公開されているメタデータについては、全てクリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンスの「CC-BY」による公開となります。

CCBYUPLOAD (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

しかし撮影場所の帝国ホテルや撮影者の後藤清一氏が公開を許可しているとの証拠は示されていません。 --ブルーメンタール (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation? See description. Xocolatl (talk) 11:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serious doubts about the ownership of these images (see also uploader history and talk page) as they have been made with various camera's or lack EXIF, some have traces on the web. Uploader needs to supply names of the real photographer and if they agree with the given license.

• File:WK Sprint 2024 Baselga di Pine.jpg
• File:Baselga di Pine WK Allround 2018.jpg
• File:Podium WWMG2020 1.500m M40.jpg
• File:Yannick van Hagen 3.000m Innsbruck.jpg
• File:Yannick van Hagen Innsbruck 2020.jpg
• File:Foto podium 1000m Innsbruck 2020 WWMG.jpg
• File:Podiumfoto 1500m WWMG2024 Elferink Wienese.jpg
• File:Jolanda Voskamp.jpg
• File:Mark Ooijevaar Goud Innsbruck 2020.jpg
• File:Team 1nP.jpg

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that this image, which can be easily found elsewhere on the internet, is available under this licence. 81.2.123.64 12:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect points to a file not associated with the location and category. The target file was once wrongly named. Uli@wiki (talk) 12:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Svg version of this logo is avaliable. Rishad 360 (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep: The file is in use. Instead tag with {{Vector version available}}. Ratekreel (talk) 22:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 12:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mistakenly uploaded, new files will be shared soon Itsmeaasifqureshi (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mistakenly uploaded, I have new version Itsmeaasifqureshi (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False copyright claim – picture downloaded from Instagram Ambiroz (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free 3D work in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Torquemada no era inquisidor? 200.39.139.29 15:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and Torquemada is also a family name. Either way, not a reason for deletion. However I am unsure of it this is in project COM:SCOPE - photo of person lying on a floor, may be part of a series of a theater production? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright? Is the user the same person as Paul Richer mentioned in the metadata? Wouter (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image seems to be from the GSBS Architects website and has been used on their social media pages. Seems unlikely (though theoretically not impossible) that the uploader had the rights to upload this. Jan-Janko (talk) 20:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright? Is the user the same person as Paul Richer mentioned in the metadata? Wouter (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Wirklich eigenes Werk, also selbst entworfen und gezeichnet? 2. Handelt es sich um ein historisch relevantes Wappen oder um ein neu erfundenes Wappen für die eigene Selbstdarstellung? GerritR (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very likely copyvio. No FoP in Costa Rica. Copyright is 70 years pma, so these are not PD until at least 2089, assuming sculptor died the moment the photo was taken. We can't assume the sculptures are freely licensed.

• File:Sloth sculpture in SJO International Airport.jpg
• File:Toucan sculpture in SJO International Airport.jpg

Rubýñ ^(Scold) 21:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are about forty images included in file. Palm Er001 (talk) 03:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All those files uploaded by User:Pierrebess are marked as "Private Pierre Besnainou" in the title or the description. If uploader, who's indicated as being the author of those pictures, is indeed French entrepreneur Pierre Besnainou as his user name would sugest (which isn't proved), that means those are supposed to be selfies. But considering how most of them are taken, it seems impossible. Furthermore, they seem to have varying qualities (some seems professional, other amateurs or even screenshots). There are clearly different authors behind them. We need the real names and authorization of the photographers.

• File:Private Pierre Besnainou.png (this one is an obvious screenshot)
• File:Private Pierre Besnainou.jpg
• File:Reichman University.jpg
• File:Pierre et Maul Besnainou à Shanghai.jpg
• File:Pierre Besnainou à la sorte du palais de l’Elysee.jpg
• File:Pierre Besnainou et son petit-fils Raphaël.jpg (this one features a child. Children pictures in France can't legally be published without the parents explicit authorization)
• File:Pierre Besnainou et David de Rothschild.jpg
• File:Pierre Besnainou and Shimon PÈRES.png (this one is an obvious screenshot)
• File:Pierre & Évelyne Besnainou.jpg

Other files not marked as "private Pierre Besnainou", but for which I doubt uploader's the real photographer:

• File:Pierre et Paul Besnainou.jpg
• File:Evelyne et Pierre Besnainou.jpg
• File:Evelyne & Pierre Besnainou.jpg
• File:Evelyne & Pierre Besnainou Italy.jpg

Another photo, File:Pierre Besnainou.jpg, also marked as "Private Pierre Besnainou", has a very obvious watermark with the real photographer's name "Alain Azria". I already added a "Missing permission" template before starting this mass deletion request.

--Titlutin (talk) 22:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible CC-BY-SA license, dual copyright issue: The doll in the photo is a work by Oskar Kokoschka, who died in 1980, and so it is protected until 2050 (70 years after the death of the creator), and the 1919 photo itself may also be protected by copyright if the photographer died less than 70 years ago (the metadata says © Fine Art Images anyway). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly assumed that Oskar Kokoschka made this doll, but per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alma Mahler doll, the creator of the dolll is Hermine Moos, who died in 1928, so the doll itself is in the public domain. If the photographer is positively unknown, this request can be treated as withdrawn, though in this case we have an explicit (bogus?) copyright claim in the metadata... and in any case, if the image is kept, the description should be amended to name Hermine Moos as the creator of the work (the doll), with an appropriate PD template. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, Possible screenshot, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]