User talk:Cutlass

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cutlass!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I could not think this file was taken by user because from exif info (author:Hetzark Segundo Wala kang jowa!; Copyright holder:(C)Hetzark Segundo 2020-SAGRA Aviation Photography). Why you think it is uploaer's own work? (^・ェ・^) (talk) 00:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Username is the same as the copyright and isn't a brand new account, it has uploaded photos before and if he uploaded photos under a false name he would most likely just mass copyvio upload. This seems to be a photographer uploading select own work photos to Commons. --CutlassCiera 00:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
username not exactly the same as exif author name. But combined with the previous photos, I believe that it is indeed the work of the uploader. (^・ェ・^) (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

[edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Cutlass, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to email

[edit]

Hello! I still exist, just not with time for Wikipedia like I used to have. I do still see unusual cars periodically; the difference is just that I don't go around with my camera at all times as a primary hobby. That's the main trick: lots and lots of time! IFCAR (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@IFCAR: Wow, awesome to see the legend is still here! CutlassCiera 16:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NARA TIF files

[edit]

Hello Cutlass,

NARA TIF files

Just an FYI re your categorization of this file: for files from NARA that have identical JPG (for article use) and TIF (lossless version for editing), only the JPG needs to be categorized. (See Category:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs). This is per Fæ (see file history) and Pi.1415926535 for example. This avoids needless duplication of files in categories. Regards, Krok6kola (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, that is why I reverted my edit right after publishing it. CutlassCiera 16:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1991 Honda Civic STD Hatchback in Frost White, front right, 05-15-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Casio F-91 W Fake or not.

[edit]

Hi. User:Cutlass You are very vigilant. My Casio F-91W has the "U". It's so small I thought it was a scratch on the screen and touched it up. I'll probably swap out the photo. A "U" is actually visible under the magnifying glass.

[file:Counterfeit Casio F-91 W front closeup minor retouch.jpg|thumb|Casio F-91W]

I only have the watch out of sentimentality, without reading glasses I can't see the watch displays at all. Thanks.

--~~~~ VSchagow (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and sorry for the late reply. I understand now. Have a nice day. CutlassCiera 16:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting back to an inferior version of Typhoon Rita

[edit]

Could you please stop reverting back to an inferior version of File:Typhoon Rita 10-22.png we’ve had to remove your reverts multiple times at this point and it’s pretty much vandalism. Titiuss (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're a sock. Please stop socking. Thanks. CutlassCiera 13:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]