British Empire map

edit

As a member of the project yourself: Feel free to edit the map in any way you see fit. You hereby have my permission however it may be a good idea to discuss on the project talk page first. --Camaeron (talk) 10:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Haida Chart

edit

I used the data available in the spanish wikipedia of population, really these data do not have proper referecences. I interpolated the available data in this article, I recognize it is not a rigurous proceeding. Thanks you, for your comments, --Davius (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seton Lake map

edit

Thanks, I'll look into it. Do You have any examples of similar (good) lake maps? feydey (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with File:Oregon Country map-fr.svg

edit

Thank you for your remarks. I just finished this map. I shall answer you soon more exactly. For the background of the map, I will do soon a blank map (without any text), and also the same as File:Oregoncountry2.png. But see also these maps of the same region (it's a page of the french Wikipedia's competition, the Wikiconcours). Regards, Bourrichon (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Those are great maps!.....will advise the page at Talk:Cascade Range and others definitely; do you have the basemaps, sans text, to adapt them to English?Skookum1 (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Trans-Canada Trail could also be shown on that one map showing similar trails in the US....Skookum1 (talk) 07:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Peace-x.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Peace-x.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Peace-x.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 16:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Central British Columbia Series 13 (HS85-10-38108) SlocanCity.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:41, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Aboriginal_peoples_in_British_Columbia

edit
 

Category:Aboriginal_peoples_in_British_Columbia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply