Petrus Adamus
|
File:Esperanto kaj la Katolika Eklezio (pt) 001.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Category:Die Pfarrkirche in Fulnek und das Mariabild am Hochaltar
editZdravím, jestli to chcete vrátit, tak to vraťte, ale tato šablona je určena jen pro soubory; některé její položky nemají pro kategorie nebo články smysl. Jestli chcete ten automatický překlad Other versions, mělo by se to vyřešit asi jinak.
Každopádně ale kategorie z principu nemůže mít licenci (to bylo to co mě uhodilo do očí). --Packa (talk) 11:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Já vím, principielně máte pravdu. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion requests
editHello, Petrus Adamus. You have new messages at Steinsplitter's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Your photos
editHi Peter. Do you have some photos taked in Nishapur? Sonia Sevilla (talk) 12:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- I have uploaded some of them:
- And I have some other ones at home but only of the some objects – in case of your interest I could send them to you.
- --Petrus Adamus (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- wow! tnx. send me.I'll check them out,Each was required to load.The category:Buildings in Nishapur i think compeleted.i need some people pic.beuty people not pedlers or Beggars!.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- As I wrote previously, my photos display just the same buildings as the ones listed above, there are no people on them. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- wow! tnx. send me.I'll check them out,Each was required to load.The category:Buildings in Nishapur i think compeleted.i need some people pic.beuty people not pedlers or Beggars!.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Rigardo al Tomsko (Rusujo) 003.jpg
editI think it's some mistake here. It's not a monument, and it's not Tomsk. Wrong category and wrong location. --Figure19 (talk) 22:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- There was really a mistake—it was not any monument. But it is Tomsk, I have been there and made the picture. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've found this place and corrected location. --Figure19 (talk) 12:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos which violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. There is at least one such photos from you, which might be non-FOP case. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 12:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Kirko de Sanktaj Simono kaj Heleno (Minsko) 007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Kirko en la trajna stacidomo Moskvo-Belorusa 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
I am really sorry, but You did a mistake in the name and description of this file. It is a part of the Train Station Square of Minsk :). I have changed descriptions in Belarusian, Czech and English, but would You change the description in Esperanto? On the whole, there are no any Lenin Square in Minsk. The former Soviet Lenin Square is the Indepenndence Square). - Frantishak (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's OK, I do not know, where I have found the wrong name, I shall suggest also moving the file to a proper name. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 21:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Photographer's Barnstar | |
For the picture of the Train Station Square in Minsk! Aarp65 (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC) |
File:CC-BY icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A barnstar for you!
editThe Photographer's Barnstar | |
For the picture of the Goethe-Institut in Khartum! Aarp65 (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC) |
Licence k fakultnímu znaku, je vůbec možné jej mít na commons?
editJakožto nahrávajícímu File:Sigillum Facultatis Medicae Primae Pragensis 01.svg ti píšu, že podle vyjádření fakulty není toto dílo public domain, jak jsi jej označil. --Wesalius (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Dobrá, nechte jej tedy smazat. Jak chápu, nelze aplikovat ani jinou svobodnou licenci a logo tedy pro encyklopedické účely není použitelné.--Petrus Adamus (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Sigillum Facultatis Medicae Primae Pragensis 01.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Template:Frescos of the Most Holy Trinity Church, Fulnek has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
|
File:Biero en Vladimiro (Rusujo) 002.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ~ Rob13Talk 06:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Template:Slovakia
editHello. {{This template}} (assuming all the others countries templates as well) displays the country name correctly (in my language, be-tarask, is Славаччына), but for somewhat reason links to an article at the be-wiki (not be-tarask). Do You have an idea how to fix it? --Renessaince (talk) 07:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I do not have any idea about it. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Statuo apud ŝoseo en Nejŝaburo (Irano) 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Собор Непорочного Сердца Божией Матери (Иркутск) 008.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- I am the author of the photo and I gave the permission - where is the problem? Petrus Adamus (talk) 07:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Burj Al-Fateh Hotel (Khartoum) 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I do not consent with such absurd copyright law, whose consequences probably even the legislator has not realized, nonetheless obviously cannot change it in any way. Petrus Adamus (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Burj Al-Fateh Hotel (Khartoum) 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I do not consent with such absurd copyright law, whose consequences probably even the legislator has not realized, nonetheless obviously cannot change it in any way. Petrus Adamus (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Reklamo pri Ĉeĥa biero en Vladimiro (Rusujo) 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Reklamo en Ĥartumo 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Мыс Бурхан вблизи поселка Хужир (Ольхон) 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Biero en Vladimiro (Rusujo) 001.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
File:Кастрычніцкая плошча (Менск) – рэклама 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Terminology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
File:Parte 003.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mykhal (talk) 06:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I guess the reason for deletion no longer holds after update, so I am retracting the deletion request. Thanks, —Mykhal (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)