Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Peter in s!

File:No_Plastic_bag_weekend.JPG

edit
 
File:No_Plastic_bag_weekend.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.177.172.228 23:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token c102327bede2eacba78dd8710b4aae72

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Mars dialisi.jpg

edit
 
File:Mars dialisi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Laurentius (talk) 09:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kyrgyz Alatau from Bishkek 2.JPG

edit
 
File:Kyrgyz Alatau from Bishkek 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

edit
 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

edit
 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Peter in s,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Batumi skyline from port.JPG

edit
 
File:Batumi skyline from port.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Halavar (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Copyright status: File:St Lucia Estuary OSM.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:St Lucia Estuary OSM.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Upper Gambia OSM.png

edit

Zu der sehr wertvollen Karte für das Flusssystem des Gambia möchte ich noch wenige Hinweise zur Verbesserung der Beschriftung geben, die mir bei näherer Betrachtung aufgefallen sind:

--Brühl (talk) 12:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Brühl, danke für das Feedback. Ich schaue es mir nochmal genauer an. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 13:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Nochmal Hallo, ich sehe was du meinst. Ich habe als Basis OSM. Als Reverenz in diesem Fall die US-Militärkarte ND28-16. Ich habe sie zwar in diesem Fall nicht um projiziert, aber es passt soweit. Die Mündung des Senini nach Geonames, ist nach den Karten die des Panini. Der Kouregnaki liegt an seinem Platz, nur ist die Differenzierung zum Koulountou ist nicht eindeutig. Mir viel schon des Öfteren auf, dass die US-Karten nur begrenz genau sind. Die CCCP-Karten sind viel genauer – nur halt leider in Cyrillisch. Wenn man weiß, wie das Gewässer heißt kriegt man es hin. Ich schaue es mir nächste Woche nochmal an (bin nicht zuhause). Falls du aber besseres Material hast nutze ich auch gern dieses. Es macht nur wenig Sinn das Original zur möglichen weiteren Bearbeitung hoch zu laden, da es riesig ist. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hallo @Brühl: , habe mir doch heute Morgen etwas Zeit genommen um das von dir angesprochene Thema etwas genauer zu betrachten. Was die Namensgebung betrifft sind die US und die Sowjet-Karten gleich. Der Fluss Senini auf Geoname entspricht auf beiden Karten dem Panini. Der Fluss Kouregnaki auf Geoname entspricht auf beiden Karten dem Senini. Was den Verlauf des Kouregnaki und des Koulountou auf der von mir erstellten Karte betrifft ist das etwas schwieriger. Es hat den Anschein, dass Kouregnaki der Name des Koulountou im Oberlauf ist. Der Fortsatz, den ich noch nach Süden als Koulountou führe, ist nach den Karten der Kouravel, der ja auch im Artikel erwähnt wird. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Habe gefunden, dass https://www.geonames.org/2415802/senini.html und https://www.geonames.org/2416558/panini.html unter identischen Koordinaten hinterlegt sind und dass googlemaps den Flusslauf einfach synonym mit beiden Namen nebeneinander beschriftet: https://www.google.de/maps/place/12%C2%B021'17.9%22N+12%C2%B032'15.3%22W/@12.4342839,-13.1963038,1453m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d12.354972!4d-12.537583 --Brühl (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Brühl, ich hab eine neue Version hochgeladen (Schreibfehler beim Senini immer noch nicht behoben). Die Frage, die mich gerade vordergründig beschäftigt ist in wieweit der Koulountou und der Kouregnaki deckungsgleich sind. Auf den Karten geht der Kouregnaki über die Mündung des Senini hinaus (Name des Koulountou in Guinea?). Wie du weißt, ist es leider recht schwierig Informationen für diesen vergessenen Teil der Welt zu finden. Ich bin offen für Vorschläge. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

zum besseren Verständnis der tatsächlichen Namensverwendung Senini und Kouregnaki dient vielleicht https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers12-06/33789.pdf#page=25 . Werden hier Kouregnaki und Koulountou synonym verwendet? --Brühl (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ist aus dem Text nicht eindeutig ersichtlich. Der Begriff Kouregnaki taucht nur zweimal auf (einmal im Text und einmal auf der Karte). Aber wenn ich mir das Bild auf Seite 21 ansehe, weiß ich wieder warum meine Karte so aussah wie sie es tat.
Fassen wir mal zusammen: auf den US und CCCP Karten ist der Hauptfluss bis zur Mündung des Senini (US), oder darüber hinaus (CCCP) der Kouregnaki. Auf der Karte in dem Horizon Document entspricht er dem längsten Talweg in dem Wiki-Artikel. Der in diesem Dokument nicht beschriftete Teil entspricht dem Kouravel auf den Militärkarten. Und schließlich wird die Fortsetzung spätestens nach der Grenze (Militär), oder schon davor (Horizon), Koulountou genannt.
Es könnte ähnlich den Nachbareinzugsgebieten von Geba und Corubal sein, die beide auf ihrem Weg den Namen ändern (der Corubal sogar zweimal). Ich würde vorschlagen wir beziehen User:Kamusser mit in diese Fragestellung ein, den Schöpfer der Karte des Gambia-Einzugsgebietes. Er konnte mir bei solchen Problemen schon einige Male helfen. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kann nicht schaden. Kannst ihn gerne einbeziehen. --Brühl (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Werde de:Koulountou textlich dem Ergebnis des user talks entsprechend anpassen. --Brühl (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Brühl (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Brühl, so verstehe ich das Ganze auch. Allerdings bin ich mit unserem Ergebniss noch nicht so recht zufrieden. Ich werde weiter die Augen offen halten und dir bescheid sagen wenn was finde. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 06:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


Category:Maps rivers of Burundi

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Maps rivers of Uganda

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Saloum OSM.png

edit

Bei genauerem Hinsehen fiel mir als letzter Zufluss des Saloum der Marigot de Fanye auf. Für einen Wasserlauf dieses Namens finde ich per Suchmaschine keinen Treffer. Vielmehr gibt es, auch bei Geonames, einen Marigot de Faoye, benannt nach der Ortschaft https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faoye. Sollte die Beschriftung in der Karte entsprechend korrigiert werden? Brühl (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Brühl. Ich weiß nicht mehr wo ich den Namen her hatte. Aber ich ändere es gerne. Gruß Peter in s (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Erledigt... Gruß Peter in s (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Karten von Sambia

edit

Moin! Könntest du bitte bei deinen Distriktkarten die Lizenzbedingungen der Ausgangsdateien einhalten, sprich Nennung der Dateien und deren Urheber? Viele Grüße, NNW 10:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ebenfalls Moin, gut das du es ansprichst. Wie ist dies genau zu formulieren? Ich verweise ja darauf, dass es eine andere Version der Datei gibt. Die Änderungen wurden entsprechend von mir durchgeführt. Das heist Urheber ist Furfur, oder wir beide? Kann aber etwas dauern, das Internet hier im Zug ist mies. Gruß --Peter in s (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Urheber der Dateien, die du hochlädst, bist du. Aber unter source verlinkst du die Ausgangsdateien und die Urheber. Man kann dafür auch Template:Own based verwenden, macht es internationaler. Andere Version bedeutet: dieselbe Karte, aber bspw. in einer anderen Sprache. Hier hast du ja Dateien genommen und Ausschnitte verwendet bzw. nur als Übersicht genutzt. Das ist dann nicht "andere Version".
Das betrifft übrigens auch Dateien wie River Niger Tributaries from Burkina Faso OSM.png, denn die Übersichtskarte ist nicht Maps-for-free. Am besten alles nochmal checken. NNW 11:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
OK, Merci! Dann gehe ich am Wochenede mal alle mein "Kreationen" nochmal durch. Gruß --Peter in s (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 01:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Bishkek 19.JPG

edit
 
File:Bishkek 19.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply