Michiel Hendryckx
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Bevestigen identiteit
editBeste Michiel, bedankt voor je uploads. Ik heb alleen een verzoek. Iedereen kan natuurlijk zeggen dat hij Michiel Hendryckx is. Zou je ter bevestiging van je identiteit een mailtje vanaf je @michielhendryckx.be emailadres naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org willen sturen? Iets in de trant van http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Michiel_Hendryckx ben ik is voldoende. Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Bedankt voor je mailtje. Als iemand er ooit nog aan twijfelt dan kan je ze verwijzen naar OTRS #2010070310021743. Multichill (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Lars noren.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pat don43wiki.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Paulclaes.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Allforlove.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Lieve mokkabon.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Yvespetry mh15.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Zzzz43.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Montfaucon383.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Maarten dan fabian.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Stefanhert2.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Jan hoet3.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Kusttram1.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Paulcla32wiki.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Jan hoet.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Papaverkorenveld.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bende wim31.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Brouwersrookt.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Luluwa23.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Els do wik.jpg was uncategorized on 3 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Lukpers675.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Lieven scheire676.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Lieven scheire675.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Milo 675.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Joke van Leeuwen 675.jpg was uncategorized on 4 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Rudolf bakker675.jpg was uncategorized on 28 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Please categorize our images !!!
editYou already have been asked by a bot to categorize your images. Therefore I don't understand why you keep on uploading images without categories. Uploading images without categorizing them doesn't make sense. Only categorized images can be found! -- Ies (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Proper werk
editDag Michiel, 't doe wel ne ki deugd vô nen ôop sebôorte pertretten te ziene iere. Oat er meserie es vô de category, vult de noame in van den typ ip de foto. Zelfs oat'rôod es, es den bot content. Wulder goan da loatr wel reegln. --Foroa (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Van_istendael675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- Deadstar (msg) 15:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Michiel, deze vraag om verwijdering berustte op een misverstand: Deadstar dacht dat het beeld kapot was, maar dat bleek niet zo te zijn. De "deletion request" werd dezelfde dag nog afgesloten, en het beeld is dus helemaal veilig. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
De Keersmaeker
editHi,
Great picture, thanks for uploading. Do not hesitate if you have more photos of dancers and choreographers to share them on Wikipedia. At the end of the day it's a mutual benefit. Sincerely.--LPLT (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- and I would add that elpi' wrote a wonderful page about the work of ATDK ! thank you both ! and pitibizou ! --Mandariine (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Bende wim31.jpg
editBij het bestand File:Bende wim31.jpg staat vermeld: 'Own work'. Ik vroeg me af of je die foto werkelijk zelf hebt getrokken, aangezien je ook op de foto te zien bent. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ik heb jouw reactie op mijn talk-pagina hier naartoe gekopieerd voor de duidelijkheid
- Beste Donarrreiskoffer, Inderdaad. De foto is op mijn nauwkeurige aanwijzing gemaakt door de vrouw van die booteigenaar. Hoe dan ook, zijn de rechten in mijn bezit. En ik zie ook dat u dat dubbelportret van Mark Eyskens en zijn echtgenote hebt versneden tot een banaal pasfotootje. Mag ik u vragen die verknipte foto uit Commons te verwijderen. U ontneemt me alle zin om hier nog aan mee te werken. Met groet, M.
- Beste Michiel, Alvast eerst bedankt voor de uitleg ivm de foto van 'Bende van Wim'. Trouwens ook heel erg bedankt voor alle prachtige professionele foto's die u al hebt vrijgegeven onder een vrije licentie.
- Toch moet ik u teleurstellen wat betreft de uitsnede. De foto's hier op commons zijn vrij voor iedereen om de kopiëren, en te wijzigen zolang de nieuwe foto's ook onder een gelijkwaardige licentie worden vrijgegeven en de auteur van de oorspronkelijke foto duidelijk vermeld blijft. Ik kan begrijpen dat het voor jou niet gemakkelijk is de mooie kadrering te zien te verdwijnen door een 'pasfoto'-crop. Toch kan het zijn dat zo een crop voor bepaalde pagina's in wikipedia nuttiger is dan jouw oorspronkelijke foto. Kijk bijvoorbeeld naar de pagina en:Prime_Minister_of_Belgium, waar alle foto's, al dan niet banale, pasfoto's zijn. Daar past dan toch geen foto van Mark met zijn vrouw? Daarom heb ik mij de vrijheid genomen om jouw foto te bewerken.
- Ik hoop dat deze teleurstelling u niet zal beletten nog foto's vrij te geven in de toekomst. Dat zou ik spijtig vinden wat het zijn prachtige foto's. Maar ik zou het wel ergens kunnen begrijpen dat u het een moeilijke stap vindt om te zien dat deze foto's van u ook mogelijks bewerkt zullen worden door anderen.
- In elk geval geval nog veel fotografeerplezier.
- Met vriendelijke groeten, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ik kan eventueel wel de gecropte foto verwijderen uit de categorie (Photos by Michiel_Hendryckx). Dan breekt hij jou reeks mooie foto' sniet zo. mvg, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Corbu675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dag Michiel Hendryckx, uit de deze categorie blijkt dat heel wat afbeeldingen baat zouden hebben bij een renaming. Als auteur van deze foto's lijk jij de geknipte persoon. Bedankt Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Gedag!
editHi Michiel,
Blij je hier ook te treffen! Topfotografen bij een project als wikipedia, ik word er helemaal filantroop van. Eindelijk een portret bij mijn wikipedia-pagina :-). http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Lieven_scheire676.jpg
Groeten, Lieven Mushlack (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Dag Michiel Hendryckx, jouw naam vind ik niet terug onder deze category. Wanneer je {{User Belgium}} op je User page zet, kom je in deze category terecht. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Photographer's Barnstar | |
Als ik zo arrogant mag zijn even voor de gehele Wikipedia-wereld te spreken: oprecht bedankt voor uw prachtige fotografische bijdragen. Een staaltje onzelfzuchtigheid dat respect verdient. Jellevc (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
File:Flor Grammens 675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Milow image
editYou added a nice image of Milow, which was used in Milow. His management company has provided a more up-to-date image. Of course, it is the editorial judgment of Wikipedia editors to choose which image should be used. I uploaded the recent image, and replaced in the Wikipedia article (I did not make any changes to the German or Dutch articles. If you think this issue should be discussed, feel free to bring it up on the talk page, I have no opinion on the artistic merits of either image, other than the simple observation that a 2012 image of an active performer would be better than a 2008 image, all other things being equal.--Sphilbrick (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Dag Michiel Hendryckx, beschik jij over een recente afbeelding van Bart De Wever? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Magritte675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Vimy she.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Vloeken zaltbommel675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dag User:Michiel Hendryckx, beschikt U over een recentere file? Die is wérkelijk outdated. Lotje (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
editDag Michiel! Gisteren nog een genoeglijk kopje thee gedronken in Utrecht met uw echtgenote. Ik geef u graag een extra grote pluim voor uw prachtige bijdragen hier op Wikimedia Commons. Spinster (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Uploads by other user
editYou may want to review the license used for File:Herreweghe_Philippe.jpg and File:CVG choir & orchestra by Michiel Hendrickx.jpg, since both these images were uploaded by another user. Buxtehude (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Léna (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Jan leyers mh 675.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
MoiraMoira (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand this nomination. This portrait is photographed by Michiel Hendryckx, and he uploaded it to Commons under a free license just like he already uploaded so many others. What makes this image suspect? Spinster (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, er zijn veel koeien die blaar heten, vandaar dat ik de filename liever zou gewijzigd zien. Wat denk je van File:Chesney Henry "Chet" Baker, Jr. - Chet675.jpg. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 12:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
U doet maar, Lotje. Met dank, Michiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michiel Hendryckx (talk • contribs) 12:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Verriest hugo ca1920.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Verriest hugo ca1920.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Verriest hugo ca1920.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File:Ecce homo 675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, volgens de beschrijving bij deze afbeelding lees ik: vlnr Wim Opbrouck, Michiel Hendryckx en Jean Blaute. Is dit Michiel Hendryckx of een naamgenoot? Ik wil de namen van de fotografen (met een artikel op Wikipedia) vermelden bij de foto's , maar daarvoor moet ik zeker zijn geen kemels te zullen schieten... Sterk staaltje bovendien, om op het water een zelfportret te maken. Of klopt de beschrijving bij het artikel niet? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, de datum waarop de foto genomen werd vind ik nergens terug. Of zie ik iets over het hoofd? Thanks. Had je misschien ook een recentere foto? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)