Geisler Martin

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Geisler Martin!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 13 years ago11 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Geisler Martin!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hintersee und Hoher Göll.jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Salzburgblick.jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Hoher Göll von der Kneifelspitze.jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Christoph Dietrich Bose.jpg was uncategorized on 11 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Halde Trages Nordseite.jpg was uncategorized on 25 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Wörth im Schliersee.jpg was uncategorized on 20 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Lulustein Saarbruecken 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Minerva Vignette.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:GrabstätteIlberg.JPG was uncategorized on 29 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Becher Vertraute Gesellschaft.jpg was uncategorized on 7 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:120411 Nabburg-Rathaus-mit-Kirche 1-1350x1150 75.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Geisler Martin, zu File:120411 Nabburg-Rathaus-mit-Kirche 1-1350x1150 75.jpg: die Stromleitung ist nunmal in echt da. Das Entfernen ist eine Verfälschung. Bitte vermerke soetwas deutlich in der Beschreibung. Wirklich enzyklopädisch ist so ein "Foto" dann meiner Meinung nach auch nicht mehr. Schöner anzuschauen, ja. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Entzerrt

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo und Dank für die Bearbeitung der Schliersee-Bilder. Wie hast Du das mit dem Entzerren gemacht? Ich bemühe mich ja durchaus, die Bilder gleich von Anfang an korrekt zu machen, aber bei diesen beiden Bildern war zum Beispiel ein Birnbaum bzw. ein Grabstein im Weg (irgendwas stört ja eigentlich fast immer - bei der Christuskirche war´s ein Baukran ;-). --Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Na, so kompliziert ist es nun nicht. Eigentlich kann es jedes bessere Bildbearbeitungsprogramm, man muss nur alle Funktionen nutzen. Ich habe Adobe Photoshop Elements. Viele Grüße --Geisler Martin (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

PS. Hast Du noch mehr solche "schräge Vögel"?

Naja, schon immer wieder mal. Jüngst zum Beispiel hier - das wäre frontal nur gegangen, wenn ich auf die Friedhofsmauer geklettert oder auf ein Grab gestiegen wäre. Beides gilt in Oberbayern als hoch ungehörig, ungeachtet hehrer enzyklopädischer Motive. Aber Photoshop habe ich und probiere das mal aus, hab mich nur noch nie intensiver damit beschäftigt. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank - und ich bin auch gerade dabei, es selber zu lernen. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wenn Du gestattest, noch zwei Tipps: Wenn Du das Gesamtbild ausgewählt und die Verzerrung vorgenommen hast, vegiss nicht, auf "Proportionen beibehalten" zu klicken, sonst wird das Bild gestaucht. Gehen dabei unten oder oben wichtige Teile verloren, musst Du vorher über "Skalieren-Arbeitsfläche ..." diese ausreichend in der Höhe vergrößern. Danach kannst Du die überstehende Leerfläche mit dem Freistellungswerkzeug abschneiden. Viel Erfolg und beste Grüße --Geisler Martin (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dank! --Rudolph Buch (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Artur Loesche.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

File:Artur Loesche.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Artur Loesche.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

– Adrignola talk 18:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Leipzig 1804 Peters-Tor.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Leipzig 1804 Peters-Tor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 07:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token f71ba48c4e4e0eb0af5b64856ca2d091

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Wimpel zur IPA - Internationale Pelzausstellung Leipzig 1930.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Toll, danke. Darf man fragen, was für ein Programm Du verwendest? --Kürschner (talk) 18:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Man darf. Zu dem vorliegenden speziellen Zweck benutze ich Micrografx Picture Publisher 8, das noch unter Windows XP läuft, wofür ich unter Windows 7 eine virtuelle XP-Maschine installiert habe. Beste Grüße --Geisler Martin (talk) 05:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Danke! Muss ich mal darüber nachdenken, mein Rechner läuft ohnehin noch unter XP. Schönen Tag! --Kürschner (talk) 07:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Neusiedlersee

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Martin,
wegen des Bildes vom Vorbeiflug am Neusiedlersee: Es ist kein besonders gutes Bild. Leider haben wir kein anderes aus ähnlicher Perspektive. Deine Idee, den Kontrast zu erhöhen, war ja gut, aber Du hast in meinen Augen das Entrauschen übertrieben. So gingen neben der Körnung des alten Analogmaterials auch die Details verloren und das Ganze war sehr verwaschen. Ich habe deshalb die alte Version, mit nur ein wenig stärkerem Kontrast, wieder hochgeladen. Wenn Du eine Bearbeitung hochladen möchtest, mach das doch bitte mit einem neuen Namen ("Austria Neusiedlersee flyby edit.jpg" oder so ähnlich, nicht indem Du das Original überschreibst. Grüße, Tsui (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 19:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bildverwendung

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ärzteblatt Sachsen 4/2014. Gruß --X-Weinzar (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Heinrich Kluibenschedl.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Kluibenschedl.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Einladung zur WLM-Fototour Erfurt 29. - 31. August 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Martin,

mit dem Hochladen von Fotos zu Thüringen hast du dich am Fotowettbewerb "Wiki Love Monuments" in den letzten Jahren beteiligt. Im September wird dieser Wettbewerb zum vierten Mal in Deutschland stattfinden. Seit kurzem sind nun auch die Denkmallisten zu Erfurt mit rund 3700 Einträgen fertiggestellt. Vielleicht hast du Lust, Deine Foto dort einzubinden.

Besonders wollte ich dich aber auf eine Fototour durch die Altstadt von Erfurt hinweisen, die am Wochenende vom 29. - 31. August stattfindet. Da es sich um eine von WMDE geförderte Veranstaltung handelt, können auf vorherigen Antrag auch die Reisekosten der Einzelnen gefördert werden. Weitere Informationen gibt es auf der Projektseite, wo auch die Registrierung erfolgt. Es würde mich freuen, wenn du wieder bei WLM dabei wärst.

Liebe Grüße von Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 07:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Doppelt gemoppelt

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Martin, zunächst danke für deine schönen Bilder! Ich wollte dich aber noch kurz darauf aufmerksam machen, dass du dasselbe Bild zweimal unter verschiedenen Namen hochgeladen hast: File:St. Pauls Brunnen.jpg und File:Eppan Brunnen in St. Pauls.jpg. Grüße, --Mai-Sachme (talk) 15:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Mai-Sachme, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte zuerst nur ein paar Urlaubsfotos ohne Artikelverwendung hochgeladen, dabei auch den Brunnen. Nun traf ich auf das leere Feld in "Liste der geschützten Ensembles in Eppan" und schon kam der zweite Griff in die Urlaubskiste. Ja, ja das Alter. Ich bemühe mich um die Löschung des ersten Bildes. Viele Grüße --Geisler Martin (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Petzscher Mark 1800.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Petzscher Mark 1800.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hilfreiche Bearbeitung

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vielen Dank für die Bearbeitung bzw. Optimierung einiger meiner Leipzig-Bilder in der Vergangenheit (Ausrichtung, Entzerrung, Farbstich). Klasse! --ThomasWF (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Drescher Magazingasse Leipzig.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Herr Geisler, I am a musician in Toronto, Canada, planning a concert about Bach and the municipal music in Leipzig. I am writing to see if I could have permission to project the image of the Stadtpfeiffer street in Leipzig for about 5 seconds during the concert. All the best, Alison Mackay

Dear Mister Mackay, there is no problem. The picture in Wikisource is free for this purpose.

All the best --Geisler Martin (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Dom Wurzen Grundriss.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Dom Wurzen Grundriss.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ellin Beiltz, da ich die Datei nur bearbeitet habe, solltest Du Dich lieber an ihren Urheber, User:Ghostwriter123, wenden. Beste Grüße --Geisler Martin (talk) 11:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stürzende Linien

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Abend Martin,

Stürzende Linien sind Teil der natürlichen Perspektive Der Bildausschnitt ist aus mehr als 50 Fotos mit Bedacht ausgewählt.

Die "Korrektur" stürzender Linien verfälscht zwangsläufig die Proportionen jedes Gebäudes. Darum ist sie als Vandalismus zu betrachten.--Ulamm (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ulamm,

jede Kamera bildet nur für eine Brennweite in "natürlicher Perspektive" ab. Insbesondere kürzere Brennweiten steigern das Auftreten stürzender Linien. Deshalb gibt es Korrekturprogramme, und moderne solche können auch die Proportionen weitestgehend beibehalten, wie hier geschehen. Dass ich bis zu Parallelität korrigiert habe war, zugegeben, ungeschickt. Ich bitte um Entschuldigung. Eines Vandalismus war ich mir dabei und auch bei den weiteren Bildern nicht bewusst. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Geisler Martin (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

a) Vandalismus bedeutet hier: Veränderung, die weder der Intention des (Vor-)Autors entspricht, noch der Wahrheit dient.

b) Die Linien stürzen selbstverständlich um so stärker, je größer der abgebildete Sichtwinkel ist.

Aber in jedem Fall ist der Winkel (und damit die Strecke auf dem Bild) zwischen zwei Objekten gleichen Abstands von einander und gleichen Abstands vom Betrachter unabhängig davon, ob sie sich in Augenhöhe des Betrachters (bzw. der Höhe der Kamera) befinden, oder die Sichtlinie in irgendeinem Winkel aufwärts (oder auch abwärts) zeigt.

Darum laufen räumlch parallele Strecken in der natürlichen Perspektive nur dann im Bild nicht aufeinander zu, wenn sie quer zur Blickrichtung verlaufen.

In den konstruierten Perspektiven des vor-fotografischen Zeitalters waren die Senkrechten fast immer senkrecht, wodurch Weitwinkeldarstellungen oft völlig verunglückt sind. Korrekte Perspektiven hätten damals die meisten Betrachter womöglich gar nicht verstanden.

Daraus haben sich dann auch Bemühungen ergeben, die Senkrechten in Fotografien senkrecht und parallel abzubilden.

Aber heutigen Betrachtern darf man reale Perspektiven zumuten.

Beste Grüße, Ulamm (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bremen_Dom_Kanzel_Kapellen_Obergaden.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Ich hatte bei der Auswahl mehrere hellere Fotos mit annähernd gleichem Bildausschnitt verworfen, weil die Obergaden-Fenster ihre Umgebeung überstrahlten.

Bitte lasse hinfort deine Finger von allen meinen Bildern!

--Ulamm (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Es steht dir natürlich frei, jede in den Commons befindliche oder sonstwie freie Datei aus dem Internet zu be- und verarbeiten.

Aber wenn du Dateien aus den Commons bearbeitest und das ist mehr als etwa eine Wasserfläche in die Waagerechte zu bringen, ohne dass nennenswerte Details verloren gehen, lade deine Bearbeitung bitte unter neuem Namen hoch.

In der Beschreibung deiner Bearbeitung sollte dann natürlich stehen, wie die Originaldatei heißt und wer die erstellt hat.

Man kann und darf zwar auch von anderen Leuten erstellte Dateien umbenennen lassen, aber bitte nicht so, dass die inhaltliche Bearbeitung das Original auf ein anderes Lemma verdrängt.--Ulamm (talk) 21:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Verstanden, Finger weg. --Geisler Martin (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:IPA Zeppelinschau.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:IPA Zeppelinschau.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:IPA Kürschner-Ehrensaal.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:IPA Kürschner-Ehrensaal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Siegelmarke Gemeinde Dittersbach .jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Siegelmarke Gemeinde Dittersbach .jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stadtplan Leipzig von Etzner (1847)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Martin, ich bin gerade dabei, Abbildungen sowohl von den historischen Villen im Musikviertel (bes. Karl-Tauchnitz-Straße, Wächterstraße, Friedrich-Rhode-Str. und Beethovenstr sowie ggf. was ich von Käthe-Kollwitz-Straße und Umgebung finde), Westvorstadt (besonders Weststraße (Fr-Ebert-Straße)) hier hochzuladen, habe dazu auch unter wikisource eine neue Rubrik Zeitschriften (Architektur) eröffnet [nur falls du neugierig bist] und die Architektonische Rundschau verlinkt sowie "Blätter für Architektur und Kunsthandwerk" von GBS und HT besorgt und zum großen Teil schon bei archive.org gespiegelt. Mein anderes "Projekt" sind Firmen aus dem Graphischen Viertel,m also Verlage und Druckereien und habe dazu auch schon einiges gesammelt und online gestellt, neue Rubriken eröffnet usw. usf. Perspektivisch wollte ich eine Seite über die Goldschmidtstraße (Kategorie hier in commons habe ich schon bearbeitet), die Stephanstraße sowie mglweise andere einen Beitrag bei der wiki zu schreiben. Im Zusammenhang mit den "Vorfühlarbeiten" darauf habe ich deinen hier online gestellten Ausschnitt aus dem Etznerschen Stadtplan von 1847 gesehen. Da der so detailliert ist, wollte ich fragen, ob du zufällig den gesamten Plan hochauflösend hast? Wenn ja, wäre es sehr nett, wenn du ihn hier oder woanders teilen könntest, im übrigen auch sehr gerne Leipziger Stadtppläne anderer Jahre, besonders solche mit schematischen Darstellungen oder Einträgen von Firmen und Institutionen. (Referenzdatei: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ro%C3%9Fplatz_1847.jpg) Danke!!!--Haendelfan (talk) 14:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC) und gleich noch eine frage, wenn ich darf: weißt du, ob es zb möglich ist, in einer untergalerie gleich alle medien einer kategorie autmoatisch einstellen zu lassen, also zb wenn ich eine seite zu der häuserfolge in der k-t mache, ob ich dann einfach die commonskategorie als untergalerie einbinden kann, dann beim nächsten haus das gleiche usw usf.--Haendelfan (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tregister Dorfkapelle 4 Altar.jpg

And also:

File:Tregister Dorfkapelle 5 Deckenbereich.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 15:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tschardake 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Tokfo (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic