Belbury

Hello Belbury, I would like to report that the image is free and unlicensed, but unfortunately I couldn't find the correct option to select on Wikimedia Commons when uploading the image and because of that I ended up selecting the wrong option. I'm sorry about that, unfortunately I'm new to Wikimedia Commons and I'm still learning. I also won't be able to get the permissions information from the image's author. So you can delete the image without any problems, I appreciate your understanding and for letting me know. Kind regards, Neurestein!! : ) (Neurestein (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC))Reply

Hi, thanks for the deletion notice, I see it's already been deleted. It was a very early contribution of me 17 years ago, when I was pretty ignorant of copyright issues, a couple of years later I became an ArbCom member of nl.wiki so in hindsight I should have known better! And it was a very poor picture too. So good riddance to it :-) --10:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC) Brinkie (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

บักสัตว์ 125.25.182.191 10:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dear Belbury did you the know that thing on the Michael Myers (Halloween) article where it says "Michael Myers is regarded as one of the most recognizable and most iconic horror villains, alongside Jason Voorhees from Friday the 13th , Freddy Krueger from A Nightmare on Elm Street and Ghostface from Scream." was actually put there on the in popular culture section by a vandal a couple of years ago and nobody notice it do you think it's unnecessary? 2600:387:15:638:0:0:0:5 21:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

When it says in popular culture doesn't mean who are the best character alongside others it means what he's like in other media and merchandise and stuff you know pop culture. 2600:387:15:638:0:0:0:5 21:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure he could be one of most recognizable and most iconic horror villains but doesn't mean he has to have someone else alongside him there's countless horror icons. 2600:387:15:638:0:0:0:5 21:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dear Belbury, while I find it very interesting to create and publish images generated by AI on Wikimedia Commons, I appreciate your commitment to separating AI-generated images from human-generated images. I don't know if you knew, but in January 2024 I proposed a Wikimedia sister project for a separation between AI-made images and human-made images (see meta:Wikimedia Commons AI). The proposal had zero support and was rejected. Still, I remain committed to improving the separation between AI-made images and human-made images. This is also why I find it incredibly important to be as transparent as possible about all the AI images I upload.

So now I've come up with a new idea: the four categories. You can read my idea on Commons talk:AI-generated media#Four categories for images. I'm curious what you think of it. Earlier I came up with the idea of requiring entered prompts to be listed in the file description, and apparently someone had also come up with this idea, because now this idea has become a reality. So that's why I think this idea of mine would also make sense. Of course, it remains to be determined where certain boundary cases belong. I can't think of a case right now, but I know I forgot to consider something... So that's why I'm curious about your viewpoint! I look forward to seeing your response! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for the deletion notice, I would like to confirm that I am a copyright holder of the deleted pictures (4 pictures in total), and you can add free licence on these 4 pictures - CC BY. Is there something else to be done regarding it, or? Best regards, Ironman33231 Ironman33231 (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ironman33231: The images you uploaded had all already been published on the subject's social media. See Commons:But it's my own work! for advice on how to show that you are the copyright holder. Belbury (talk) 09:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I put those 4 pictures on CCBY licence on the media that you pointed me to. Please let me know about the next steps. Best, Ironman33231 Ironman33231 (talk) 08:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ironman33231: Great, thank you. You can raise an Commons:Undeletion request including links to the social media posts in that request, and the deleted images will be restored. Belbury (talk) 09:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Can you check now is everything alright with article, please? Thanks. Ironman33231 Ironman33231 (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ironman33231: Looking at the requests, they have been rejected because you did not include links to the social media posts.

en:Draft:Andrea Komljenovic has already been reviewed and declined on Wikipedia. I wouldn't have anything to add to that beyond pointing you to Wikipedia's policies on writing autobiographies. I'll post a message on your talk page there. Belbury (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed you moved Category:Sausage rolls (Commonwealth) under Category:Sausage rolls by country and recategorised some related photos. I believe Category:Sausage rolls (Commonwealth) is more of a category about the type of sausage rolls, instead of about the location of the sausage rolls. So I think it's not quite appropreate to put it under Category:Sausage rolls by country, but maybe Category:Sausage rolls by type, though it doesn't exist yet. Onthewings (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Onthewings: Makes sense! I wrongly assumed it was a general category for photos from Commonwealth countries outside of the UK. I've reverted my changes and added a description/definition to the category. Belbury (talk) 08:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your quick action! It's much clearer now with the added description. Onthewings (talk) 01:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

My name Abdul mumin Bangladesh and i am pour man my near the no maney you helf me 103.158.62.37 17:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Try the Commons:Help desk. Belbury (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply