Alicia Fagerving (WMSE)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alicia Fagerving (WMSE)!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Sandbox

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. What is your bot doing to our poor defenseless sandbox, and why? — Jeff G. ツ 23:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Överkategorisering

Latest comment: 7 years ago18 comments5 people in discussion

Hej. Kul med alla nya bilder som bot:en laddar upp!

Det verkar dock vara en hel del överkategorisering i förhållande till rådande struktur. Går det att göra något åt detta? Det blir ett väldigt städarbete så som det är nu. Exempel: File:Lugnås kyrka - KMB - 16000200165329.jpg Bilden på Lugnås kyrka har korrekt skapats i Category:Lugnås kyrka, men den har fått även lagts direkt i Churches in Mariestad Municipality och Buildings in Mariestad Municipality. Då Category:Lugnås kyrka från start är underkategori till Churches in Mariestad Municipality som i sin tur är underkategori till Buildings in Mariestad Municipality så blir bilden i och med detta överkategoriserad. Går detta att undvika på något sätt? --I99pema (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Hej! Jo, vi är medvetna om det. Själva uppladdningsomgången kommer att avslutas inom ett par dagar. Vi kommer då köra en runda över alla filer som fått en specifik kyrkokategori och ta bort eventuella Municipality-kategorier. Så det är inget som behöver göras manuellt nu. --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Det låter fint. Då avvaktar jag med manuella flyttar tillsvidare. Finns det någon sida man kan följa arbetets fortskridande? --I99pema (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Du får gärna kolla på projektets sida på Phabricator. --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tack. Verkligen kul med alla nya bilder! --I99pema (talk) 11:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Om bilden tagits inuti kyrkobyggnaden, och det finns en kategori som heter "interior of x church/kyrka", skall bilden läggas där, och du behöver inte direkt använda kategorin "x church/kyrka". J 1982 (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Boten för att plocka bort kommunkategorierna från bilder i kyrkokategorierna tuggar nu. Hojtar till när den är färdig.

@J 1982: Problemet är att det ofta saknas metadata som säger att bilden var tagen innuti kyrkan, därför kunde de kategorierna inte automatiskt sättas./André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Boten har nu plockat bort de kommun/kyrkoöverkategoriseringar som den kunde känna av (totalt 48644 stycken). /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 08:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@André Costa (WMSE): OK. Då är det bara att konstatera att ett STOORT städarbete återstår. Kolla exempelvis på bilderna på kyrkorna i Category:Churches in Gotland, som förutom den rätta kyrkkategorin även ligger i Category:Buildings in Gotland --I99pema (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Jag har ett annat skript som plockar bort alla bilder från en kategori som även ligger i en av dess underkategorier. Just Gotland vet jag var lite speciellt, är det samam sak i andra kommuner?. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@André Costa (WMSE): Ja. Kolla på File:Eggby kyrka - KMB - 16000200153740.jpg Den är fortfarande kategoriserad som Category:Churches in Skara Municipality, Category:Eggby kyrka och Category:Buildings in Skara Municipality--I99pema (talk) 11:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Har utökat den gamla körningen med "Buildings in" och "Churches in" och kör igen. Se t.ex. [1]. Pingar här när den är klar. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 13:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Den nya körningen blev färdig under veckoslutet. Det kan fortfarande finnas bilder som ligger i både "Buildings in..." och "Churches in..." men de ligger i så fall inte i en (känd) kyrkokatgori. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@André Costa (WMSE): Fint. Hur kommer det sig att boten i uppladdningen misslyckats med att identifiera så många kategorier, och finns det något som kan göras i efterhand? Exempel File:Nittorps kyrka - KMB - 16000200162928.jpg blev inte lagd i Category:Nittorps kyrka, vilket förövrig gäller de flesta bilder i Category:Churches in Tranemo Municipality --I99pema (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Problemet var att det inte fanns någon data genom vilken vi exakt kunder säga vilken kyrka som avbildades. Men eftersom det fanns så pass många kyrkbilder så gjorde vi en speciallösning utifrån de kyrkokategorier som vi automatiskt kunde identifiera. Anledningen till dubbelkategoriseringen var att denna speciallösning inte sa till övriga kategoriseringsmekanismer att bilden redan var hanterad. Anledningen till att så många kyrkkategorier missades är en kombination av att kyrkonanmn inte alltid anges på samam sätt, att strukturen i kategoriträden inte alltid ser likadan ut samt i vissa fall att commonscat länkarna från Wikidata har pekat fel.

Bortsett från de insattser jag nu gjort (vilket hanterade felet jag nämnde ovan) så tror jag inte att det är något annat som man automatiskt kan åtgärda. Sedan kan man självfallet skapa fler Wikidatakopplingar, rätta Commonscat kopplingar för kommuner, sakap nya kategorier etc. men det blir då inför framtida importer av liknande slag. Däremot ska det vara så att den manuella kategoriseringen här resulterar i att RAÄ uppdaterar sina kopplingar på bilderna så att de sedan länkar till en unik kyrka. Men detaljer om det får du ta med @Ainali: . /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@André Costa (WMSE): Tack då vet jag. Då fortsätter jag sorteringen manuellt. Värmlands län är avklarat och nästan hela Västra Götalands.--I99pema (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Skulle det vara möjligt att kategorisera de bilder som har ett säkert datum efter år också (i t.ex. Category:Aerial photographs of Sweden by year)? moralist (talk) 11:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Moralist: Tack för förslaget, jag kör en omgång med flygbilderna till att börja med. --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 08:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Media contributed by RAÄ: needing categorisation (no exact match)

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Går det på något sätt att få denna kategori att automatiskt tas bort när man sorterar in i en kategori? Jag ser det som ett problem att vi nu gör dubbelarbeten i uppstädandet. Om en användare utgår ifrån kategorin Churches in xxx för att sortera in / skapa upp rätt underkategori så kommer bilden ändå att ligga kvar som okategoriserad. Jag ser samtidigt att andra användare utgår ifrån denna kategori när flyttarna görs, vilket då kan bli ett onödigt extraarbete. Finns det någon tänkt arbetsordning? @André Costa (WMSE): --I99pema (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Ett rimligt steg är nog att gå igenom bilderna i no exact match-kategorin och se om de även ligger i en kategori med " kyrka" i namnet. Åtminstone för kyrkorna (som utgör merparten av uppladdningen) verkar det som ett säkert sätt att hitta bilder där åtgärdskategorin kan tas bort automatiskt. Jag kör ett litet prov med boten och bevakar. --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 14:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Det låter bra. Man skulle sedan även kunna köra en städning på " kapell". Mitt mål är att gå igenom samtliga län och sortera in lösa bilder i rätt kategori. Hittills har jag avklarat Värmlands-, Västra Götalands-, Örebro-, Stockholms-, Jönköpings- och Östergötlands län och jobbar vidare på Upplands län. --I99pema (talk) 19:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Startar en städning på " kyrka" och " kapell". 64k filer i no-exact-match just nu. -- Alicia som inte orkar logga om

Få kyrkbilder i Östergötlands län

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Det är väldigt få bilder uppladdade i Östergötlands län. Det saknas exempelvis helt i Boxholm Category:Listed churches in Boxholm Municipality. Är detta som det skall, eller har något gått fel i upplandningen av detta län? --I99pema (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Söker man på http://kmb.raa.se/cocoon/bild/public_search.html på Malexander, Rinna eller Åsbo så kommer ingen av kyrkorna upp. Så de finns helt enkelt inte. --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 13:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Case for a Bracelet with a Portrait Miniature (see NMB 2349a-b) (Anders Petter Lundqvist) - Nationalmuseum - 181586.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Case for a Bracelet with a Portrait Miniature (see NMB 2349a-b) (Anders Petter Lundqvist) - Nationalmuseum - 181586.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Dosa med två miniatyrer (Charles Boit & Jean Petitot) - Nationalmuseum - 117975.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Dosa med två miniatyrer (Charles Boit & Jean Petitot) - Nationalmuseum - 117975.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Fredrik I, King of Sweden (Martin van Meytens d.y.) - Nationalmuseum - 133138.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Fredrik I, King of Sweden (Martin van Meytens d.y.) - Nationalmuseum - 133138.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Medaljong. Oval. Porträtt av man målat på porslin i ram av metall - Nationalmuseum - 136132.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Medaljong. Oval. Porträtt av man målat på porslin i ram av metall - Nationalmuseum - 136132.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Portrait de Sir Harbord Harbord, 1er Baron Suffield (1734-1810) (William Grimaldi) - Nationalmuseum - 177282.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Portrait de Sir Harbord Harbord, 1er Baron Suffield (1734-1810) (William Grimaldi) - Nationalmuseum - 177282.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Unknown woman (Elias Brenner) - Nationalmuseum - 159191.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Unknown woman (Elias Brenner) - Nationalmuseum - 159191.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Portrait of a Lady wearing a hat with a green bow (Henry Jacob Burch) - Nationalmuseum - 177238.tif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Portrait of a Lady wearing a hat with a green bow (Henry Jacob Burch) - Nationalmuseum - 177238.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 09:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Felaktiga beskrivningar - Sjöhistoriska

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T191431

Hej. Det verkar som om många bilder fått helt felaktiga beskrivningar. Klickar man på länken till inventarienummer kommer dock den rätta bilden upp. Exempel File:Teckning - Sjöhistoriska museet - SB 139.tif och File:Teckning - Sjöhistoriska museet - SB 100.tif --I99pema (talk) 12:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@I99pema: Tack för rapporten. Det verkar ha blivit en felaktig koppling mellan bildfilens id och beskrivningens id. Märk gärna sådan bilder med Category:Media contributed by SMM: wrong image så ska vi försöka undersöka vad som orsakat det. Har du en känsla för hur många av bilderna som är påverkade?. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hej. Nej ingen känsla. Jag gjorde bara några stickprov. --I99pema (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hej @I99pema: . Jag upptäckte nu att beskrivningarna faktiskt stämmer och länkar till rätt objekt. MEN det är konstverk med en fram och baksida. Tittar man noggrant i beskrivningen så talar den om framsidan och frånsidan, och den teckning du länkade till är just frånsidan. =) Den negativa nyheten är att det finns ca. 240 sådana bilder (listade på phab:P6954)/André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hej igen @I99pema: . För uppföljningens skull är Category:Media contributed by SMM: wrong image uppdaterad med en beskrivning om tillvägagångssättet för att rätta till och tömma kategorin. Tack Alicia för att vi fått låna din diskussionssida också. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Reykjavik - KMB - 16001000121364.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Reykjavik - KMB - 16001000121364.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 01:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Reykjavik - KMB - 16001000121386.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Reykjavik - KMB - 16001000121386.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kategorisering igen!

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hej, laddar du objekter, ladda de i resp. kategorier, esp. om sådana finns! T.ex. File:U513_Rimbo_kyrka_-_KMB_-_16000300028311.jpg ska ju in i Category:Upplands runinskrifter 513, eller åtminstone Category:Runestones, Uppland! Municipality har ingenting att göra med medeltid och det går inte att hitta sådana bilder utanför Upplandska stenar. Annars lämna dem kvar på kmb sidan, det blir lättare att hitta de där! Macuser (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Who will clean all this mess ??? =

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

811 osorterade KMB bilder bara i Category:Runestones_of_Uppsala_Municipality ??? Macuser (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please stop: Sami clothing additions

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please stop adding all of the kolt photos from Nordiska museet into Category:Sami clothing. None of them are actually Sámi clothing. Thank you. -Yupik (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Testing structured data

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I saw that you tried out using other statements on Test-Commons. If you get a moment, could you please let the development team know how it went for you? Even if everything was fine and you do not have anything to say, that's good feedback to have as well. Thanks, happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled rights given

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 20:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Alicia Fagerving (WMSE),

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

structured data redundancy

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is not necessary to add both "Wiki Loves Monuments 2011" and "Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 i Sverige"

as the latter is a part of the former. Furthermore, most of these pictures did not make the cut to compete in the final, which the first mentioned entity could say to represent.

All the best, Vogler (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Heja!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jag ville bara säga att jag blir så glad att se bevakninglistan fyllas upp med wlm-sdc-redigeringarna från din bot. Fint jobbat! Ainali (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fel hos Nordiska Museet

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jag noterarade att File:En småländsk svartkonstbok – Fataburen Kulturhistorisk tidskrift.djvu inte alls innehåller PG Wistrands artikel från Fataburen 1906, sidorna 239-244 utan istället en bokrecension från sidorna 246 och framåt. Felet ligger hos Nordiska museet som har lagt upp posten felaktigt här. Thuresson (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9349.tif

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9349.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9349.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9350.tif

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9350.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Lundgren på DODONA - Sjöfartsmuseet Akvariet - SMGF9350.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Altar, altare - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GM 577.bild1.tif

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Altar, altare - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GM 577.bild1.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Altar, altare - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GM 577.bild1.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Print, grafisk bild - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GM 9997.tif

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Watercolour, akvarell-Ludvig Messmann - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GMA 3722 48.tif

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Watercolour, akvarell-Ludvig Messmann - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GMA 3722 48.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Watercolour, akvarell-Ludvig Messmann - Göteborgs stadsmuseum - GMA 3722 48.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Iran with bad coordinates

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WLM Iran

Alicia, I just noticed this in this GLAM newsletter about Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Iran with bad coordinates. You are right that bad coordinates are replicated into SDC. But as you said it makes it also easier to spot. In fact the WLM images for Iran were much worse as you think. With geogroup I thought I had corrected all of the incorrect coordinates for Iran. Many had lat and lon interchanged. Your query had a slightly different angle so some are still incorrect. The source of the mistakes originates for the lists on fa: wikipedia. In November last year I managed to correct this (see for example this. As Farsi numerals are different form the Roman numarals I used excel to find/replace thoste, then intecahnded lat and lon, and changed the numerals back........
I also checked all other WLM coordinates, but there were much less coordinate mistakes, which I corrected too.
For images from Wiki Loves Earth Brazil there still is a challenge. See also this (archied) request. HenkvD (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fel information på bilder från RAÄ

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hej! Har hittat två bilder med fel information. Tittar man på andra bilder från Category:Svenneby gamla kyrka är det uppenbart att de inte är samma kyrka. Bilderna verkar istället vara inifrån Category:Svenneby kyrka. Har mailat ata(at)raa.se om felet, och fått ärendenummer I-2210-0008.
File:Svenneby gamla kyrka - KMB - 16000200010623.jpg
File:Svenneby gamla kyrka - KMB - 16000200010625.jpg
//LevandeMänniska (talk), 20:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Artistic creation, Paris - UNESCO - PHOTO0000002956 0001.tiff

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Artistic creation, Paris - UNESCO - PHOTO0000002956 0001.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Solar energy, Allahabad - UNESCO - PHOTO0000001669 0000.tiff

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Solar energy, Allahabad - UNESCO - PHOTO0000001669 0000.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 �� македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

62.216.206.191 16:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Solar energy, Allahabad - UNESCO - PHOTO0000001670 0000.tiff

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Solar energy, Allahabad - UNESCO - PHOTO0000001670 0000.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

62.216.206.191 16:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Sickla - KMB - 16001000536716.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sickla - KMB - 16001000536716.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GustafSeb (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

WLE-bilder med märkligt depicts (P180)

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hej!

Igår kväll tittade jag igenom lite bilder från WLE Sverige och upptäckte då att AliciaFagervingWMSE-bot (talk · contribs) hade gjort några märkliga depicts (P180)-redigeringar. Kaninhålet ledde mig vidare till Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Armenia & Nagorno-Karabakh där jag upptäckte att boten gjort många redigeringar (se sökning) där Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Armenia & Nagorno-Karabakh‎ (Q109484553) satts som värde för depicts (P180), vilket känns märkligt. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wow, vad bra att du hittade detta. Det är verkligen många filer. Det blir en del att fixa -- jag har hämtat listor över påverkade filer och skall köra igenom dem för att ta bort det... Tack! @LevandeMänniska: --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kände instinktivt att QuickStatements inte va rätt verktyg för att redigera över 20k bilder 😀. Men det är roligt att kunna hjälpa till, och kaninhålet leder ofta till spännande upptäckter. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 11:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.

To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform).

A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!

Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:100 000 Bildminnen/Photographs by Anna Rudbeck. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 01:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Drillar på spilåpipa

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Drillar på spilåpipa is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Free_music_on_Wikipedia

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Free music on Wikipedia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 22:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

KMB clean-up

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jeg har en masse af de - KMB - medier, som du er i gang med, på min watchlist, hvilket ødelægger min mulighed for at følge med i mere interessante ting. Jeg har over 200.000 filer på min watchlist, hvilket betyder at min browser hænger uendeligt, hvis jeg klikker på "Rediger din liste med overvågede sider". Ved du hvordan jeg kan hente den via curl? Hjart (talk) 08:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic