User talk:Ganpati23

Welcome!

Hello, Ganpati23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ElComandanteChe (talk) 11:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And apart from the standard welcome, congratulations on registering an account. Regarding your question, I guess as many sources and information on them as possible is always good. You may add quotations or anything else you see fit as a free text inside <ref> tag, or use one of the cite templates, {{cite book}} for example (notice the "quote" parameter). Cheers, ElComandanteChe (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add [[]] to them.

Buggie111 (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help please - wiki virgin. I've just added a paragraph to the Hildebrand and Hillgrubber section, with references. But both 'Mein Kampf', 'Zweitesbuch' and 'Lebensraum' should be in blue and linked to the wiki page. I don't know how to do this. To sign do I just do (Ganpati23 (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC))? Ganpati23 (Ganpati23 (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

{{helpme}} wiki virgin

I've just been shown how to do links [[]], but how do I direct if it leads to one of those pages with loads of options?

eg, while Mussolini and Poland work, Franco and Czech don't.

So how can I get Franco to link to Franco's page, and Czech to Czechoslovakia? After all, the book I'm quoting is quite clear that just Czech should be incorporated into the Reich, not Slovakia as well, and this gave much shorter, and easily defensible borders.

Thanks. --Ganpati23 (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pick out the page you want from the DAB page then you use a "pipe" - a vertical bar "|" - [[Czechoslovakia|Czech]] - shows as Czech - before the pipe is the link, after the pipe is the text you see.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

Thanks mate. Got it working. but {{helpme}} what is the < n o w i k i > bit. Had to write it like that as it doesn't show up. I haven't put that in anywhere, but the links seem to work. Thanks again, and sorry to be a pain.--Ganpati23 (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC) --Ganpati23 (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the "nowiki" is so we can show you what to write instead of it becoming a link. So yes, you got it right; nowiki is only to demonstrate how it works. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Ganpati23 (talk) 19:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want help learning the ropes, I could offer adoption. I've slacked off a bit on my course, but I could hand you a link when I'm done updating it. I'd also suggest joining WP:MILHIST, a place where people (like me) get together to coordinate improvements on various subjects on military history. How's this sound? Buggie111 (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please, I'd really appreciate that. I'll have a look at the milhist in a bit. I've already looked at a couple of pages I could add to:

1)Munich_Conference. I just gave it a skim, but noticed it didn't mention a) Hitler didn't want to be appeased, he expected his demands to be unacceptable. b) The reasons for him changing his mind - the lack of support for his military parade, Goring and Mussolini, and c) His regret "That chap NC has spoiled my entry into Prague" and in April '44 still calling it his biggest mistake. Though he did try to convince the press in early 39 that he'd done the right thing "2,000kms of fortifications without a shot being fired".

2) Lebensraum: The author says practical implementation started in 1939 with the invasion of Poland. a) Actually, all his actions from 1933 - reamament, Rhineland, Aut, Cz, Pol, were all leading to this, as he said in a speech to the generals in Nov 39. b) He ideally wanted Pol to join him, and offered them the Ukraine, but they didn't want to be a Nazi satellite c) He told the LoN High Commissioner in Danzig in Aug that all his actions were directed against Russia, and had said in May that LR in Russia, not Danzig was the issue. d) In the next sentence the author says that the order for complete settlement only came in 1941, the year of Barbarossa. So you could argue LR's practical implementation started either with re-armament in 33, or in 1941. Rowse, Bullock, Trevor-Roper, Weinberg, Dray, Bell etc would all see his actions upto and including Poland as just examples of his flexibility and opportunism in pursuit of his sole aim, LR in Rusia, especially the Ukraine bread-basket "so they can't starve us out as they did in the last war".

So help in doing this properly, and with the referencing (someone tidied up my first attempt) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for the advice and I'll await suggestions about how to go about it. Will look at the milhist link when I get back from the shops.

Thanks a lot, mate. And Happy New Year. --Ganpati23 (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Happy New Year's to you, too. Buggie111 (talk) 20:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help this newbie - only 2nd day. Yesterday, editing my first page, I added some references, but put the entire reference in the <R>...</R> bit. Thankfully someone tidied it up for me to split the refs and bibliography.

I've just been editing Munich_Agreement#The_Pressure_on_Czechoslovak_government, the first two paragraphs, with references 2-24, but have made the same error. (I also need to check to see what blue links I can/need to add)

Some chap nicely said he'd adopt me when he's finished the course, but it the mean time, can someone please tell me how to do the refs and biblio properly. I will keep editing this page tomorrow, as not only citations missing, but there were a couple of errors and some serious omissions.

(I would try to look at the help pages, but when there's a page with 100 new expressions in blue that I don't understand, I just end up with 300 open tabs and lose all track of what's being said. I know this makes me sound an idiot, but the stuff I've added is right.

btw the original article said Benes changes his mind on Sept 2nd, my two sources say 4th or 5th so I've put both with the source for each (leaving out the uncited, original 2nd). When I've checked other books, I'll have a clearer idea of the true date. But was it right to say ...On the wth (ref) or 5th (ref), Benes changed his ......

Many thanks. --Ganpati23 (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Essentially, the term "bibliography" means different things within different cultures. Oftentimes, people use the terms interchangeably, while others distinguish between the two. For the sake of Wikipedia, when offering a list of publications for which the subject has authored, we include this in a "Published works" section. Article layout assistance can be found here. Further information on citations can be found here and here:

How references work

Simple references [edit] These require two parts; a) Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref> b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}"; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Ganpati23/reftest and try it out. Named references [edit] Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook"> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/> Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. Citation templates [edit] You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref> Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 12:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• What I mean is that the first page I edited had citation needed. So I added the whole book info in a <r>...</r> bit (where r=ref). i.e Bloggs, J. 'World War 2', (2010), p.123, the Made up Uni Press, London. A litlle blue ref [1] would appear in the text, with the whole details appearing next to 1. in the NOTES at the bottom.

But it should just be <Bloggs, 2010, p.123> in the notes at the bottom, with the book details appearing in the BIBLIOGRAPHY below the notes.

So if I had references all from the same book, eg [1] p.123, [2] page 124 and [3] p.125, then it should ne that the notes say 1 Bloggs, 2010, p.123, 2 Bloggs, 2010, p.124, 3 Bloggs, 2010, p.125, with the book details just appearing once in the bibliography.

Also if I use Blogs p.123 for several different refs, then (when my first edit was mixed for me), it would have [1] at the three different locations in the text, with a litlle(up hat symbol) followed by little blue a,b,c before the Author, date and page in the notes.

cf [Dunkirk_evacuation] refs 35 and 38 which have been fixed for me compared with [Munich_Conference] notes 1-24 which haven't.

Thanks for your help. --Ganpati23 (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done: i have seperated the refs into footnotes and sources (bibliography). By clicking on each blue footnote you are taken to the corresponding item in the bibliography list. If you need further assistance just notify me on my talk page and/or re-convert the {{helpme}} tag. Cheers, benzband (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, mate. When I continue with the next Munich paragraph(s) tomorrow or the next day, I will try to do it properly. I'll have a look at how you did it (eg, what symbols etc) and try to do the same. If I have any problems, I'll let you know via your talk page. I really appreciate how helpful everyone's been these last 48 hours as I try to learn how to do it correctly. Thanks again. --Ganpati23 (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In the article Munich_Agreement#The_Pressure_on_Czechoslovak_government, for example, do I blue link very occurrence of Hitler (or a less common term such as General Rundstedt), or only the first. Or only the first in each section?

If it was a long article, for example, and a user used the index to jump to a mid-point, they might not realise that von R was blue linkable to his own page.

But if I link every occurrence of every term with its own wiki page, then half the article could theoretically be in blue.

Many thanks, --Ganpati23 (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC) (a newbie)[reply]

Check out the manual of style on overlinking and underlinking. Hope this helps, benzband (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• To give a direct answer, we generally only link the first occurrence (although links can be repeated in things like infoboxes) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my experiences, I've always linked once in the intro and once in the body. Buggie111 (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ganpati23! According to recent change shown here you re-added the {{helpme}} template even though it's only supposed to be on your talk page. I put it below. Please remember this next time. Thanks! NCISfan2 (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme-helped}}

Why was it removed? I've re-added it.

Everything is correct and I'm asking friends to provide references where possible. The point is that the Free Rave scene was the biggest cultural phenomenon in 1992, that's why it was banned. This led to it's export to Europe where a whole new culture has been created. You could argue that while exports such as The Beatles and Punk only created music scenes, the Teknivals had had a longer legacy. They're still going in France 19 years after the first one.

These countries never had any culture of free festivals and living in vehicles. They have been debated in parliament, legislated against, been subjected to violent repression, but they still continue. Upon leaving the last one in France I went to, the newspaper's headline read "80,000 teuffeurs a la teknival". There were notices giving instructions on the digital boards over the motorways. Many words have entered various European languages as a result of this, and a new culture, and a more enduring one than any of the UK's previous musical-cultural exports, has been created.

If someone thinks this is in the wrong place, or somehow irrelevant to this section, please justify this, don't simply remove it. The fact is that it is non-commercial, but it is culturally significant. The fact that it can't be measured in No.1s or golden-discs is irrelevant. The point is that more people have been to these teknivals in the fields and warehouses of Europe in the last 20 years that have seen any British band, with the possible exception of the likes of the Rolling Stones.

There world would have remained pretty much unchanged if all but a few of the acts listed had never formed. However, had Castlemorton not led to the CJA and Spiral Tribe going to Paris then Barcelona, there would not have been a free Rave scene, and no free festivals or Teknivals, in many European countries. This is surely relevant to British musical culture.

In fact I fail to see how it cannot be relevant to this section.

Ganpati23 (talk) 17:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a thing wrong with it at all, but it was too detailed, belongs in the Teknival article (similar to other music scenes linked), i trimmed the detail and added it to festivals (with cite). Chie one (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chie one seems to have taken care of your help request, so I've marked it resolved. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 13:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do you add a citation needed to a page?

The first sentence of [[1]] needs one.

thanks.

Ganpati23 (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just place {{fact}} at the end of the sentence you're requesting a source. That's all.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I've removed stub status from Second_Thirty_Years_War after adding the counter arguments, refernces and bibliography.

Is this ok?

Many thanks.

Also, Listen_to_Britain was rated start class, but I've corrected the error about the quoted introduction (it was only in the US release, the whole point was Jennings wanted the world to listen to Britain but not with words. It was added by a 'nervous' civil servant who feared the Americans would not understand the subtlety.) I've also added the Poetry, Propaganda, Myth and Ambiguity section along with refernces and bibliography. How do I ask it to be examined for B-class status? And how do I find out what needs to be done for it to be upgraded in this way? And now I've removed stub staus from Second_Thirty_Years_War (if this is ok) how do I find what status it is now, and what would be needed to improve it further?

Where do I find out about these stub/start/B/A statuses?

Many thanks.

Ganpati23 (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second Thirty Years War is "within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history" (from Talk:Second Thirty Years War); you can check with them for approval, or editors who monitor or watchlist the page may contact you or make changes. Listen to Britain is "within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film" (from Talk:Listen to Britain); each project's guidelines are similar but adapted to their specific subject, and can be accessed by clicking the 'quality scale' or 'criteria' hyperlinks in the talk page project box, or navigating the WikiProject pages themselves. Dru of Id (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

so do I just go to the respective projects, go to talk, start a new section, and ask someone to look at the pages? (Sorry for ignorance - newbie). Many thanks. Ganpati23 (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is under the purview of the Military History Wikiproject, I have listed it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests#Requests for assessment for you. Someone will come and do an independent evaluation. Cheers, -- Dianna (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thanks. Will they let me know what they think via the talk page and make suggestions for improvement? And shall I go to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film and ask someone via talk to look at Listen_to_Britain? Many thanks. Ganpati23 (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they'll leave comments on the talk page. I would suggest that you ask for an assessment of Listen to Britain at the Military History project requests page that Diannaa links above. Since it's a war film, it's in the scope of the Military History project. Danger! ^{High voltage!} 18:51, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have done. I'm glad about that as the contextual analysis of the ambiguity of Jenning's propaganda is of more interest to MilHist types than film buffs. Any idea how long it can take for pages to be assessed? Many thanks. Ganpati23 (talk) 19:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from the archives of the page, a few days at most. The turn-over is remarkably quick. (I've always been extremely impressed by the, um, military efficiency of the MilHist project.) Danger! ^{High voltage!} 20:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, mate. That bought a smile to my face. If you spot any basic errors I'm making, please let us know. All the best. Ganpati23 (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 07:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your comments on the talk page for Mary Seacole are extremely intemperate. Wiki editors are meant to be polite and not indulge in personal attacks. I think an apology is owed. Sceptic1954 (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a pain, but I've never used quotes before, but have just added one here:

Douglas_Bader#Personality

and wanted to make it look better.

I looked at FAQs and just used the most simple option so as not to get confused at my first attempt.

But if someone could suggest which would be the best formatting (left/right/centre/bold etc) and what else I need to add (I just used

{quote box

quote = xxxxxxx})

I'd be really grateful.

Many thanks.

Ganpati23 (talk) 03:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Links to foreign wiki pages:

I found that Erich Balla {the source I quoted in the page I edited} has a German wiki page. And many people have an auto-translate button in their browsers now. But I looked at wiki and it said that to link a foreign page you put [ [:country code:name] ], which I did, using de as country code [ [:de:Erich Balla] ]. {Though without the space between the two square brackets, obviously.}

However this displayed it on the page {with a sort of mauve coloured link} as de:Erich Balla {Not in bold, obv.} The link still worked, but it would have confused people reading it.

Is this meant to have been displayed in this manner?

Surely you should be able to get it to link without displaying the country code and colon {de:} in front of his name? Help appreciated.

Ganpati23 (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could use a "piped link". If you type [[:de:Erich Balla|Erich Balla]] it will show as Erich Balla and will go to the German article. On the Principle of least astonishment, you should perhaps provide some indication that the link goes to a German-language article.

Thank you. Got it working now. Ganpati23 (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ganpati23. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ganpati23. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ganpati23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alexandre Lacazette, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:16, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Imperial Blue (film) instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imperial Blue (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imperial Blue (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ganpati23! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]