Jump to content

User talk:Vanished user ewfisn2348tui2f8n2fio2utjfeoi210r39jf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Carlaude)


Category:Christian denominations and unions by century established

Category:Christian denominations and unions by century established, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Protestant denominations and unions by century established

Category:Protestant denominations and unions by century established, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unacknowledged internal copying and problems with citations

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism#Unacknowledged internal copying and problems with citations -- PBS (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heads of state of Bangladesh

Category:Heads of state of Bangladesh, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BBGF=5-12-07a.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:{{{1}}}]] missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christian denominational families

Category:Christian denominational families, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Zfish118 (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christian denominational families

Category:Christian denominational families, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Zfish118 (talk) 13:49, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Biblical names of stars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biblical names of stars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical names of stars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 13:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Christian media organizations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Christian media organizations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian media organizations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dmol (talk) 19:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prime ministers of Burundi has been nominated for discussion

Category:Prime ministers of Burundi, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Christianity by century

Template:Christianity by century has been nominated for merging with Template:History of Christianity. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 05:51, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Centuries in Christianity

Template:Centuries in Christianity has been nominated for merging with Template:Christianity by century. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox theological work

Template:Infobox theological work has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox theologian. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Christian denominations in the English-speaking world

Template:Christian denominations in the English-speaking world has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PPEMES (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catholic congregations established in the 17th century has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Protestant congregations by century of establishment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Calvinist organizations established in the 17th century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:WPESCHATOLOGY" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:WPESCHATOLOGY. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#Template:WPESCHATOLOGY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heads of state of the Czech Republic has been nominated for deletion

Category:Heads of state of the Czech Republic has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 13:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Formerly papal dioceses established in the 11th century has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Thought of Thomas Aquinas Part I" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thought of Thomas Aquinas Part I and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 9#Thought of Thomas Aquinas Part I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian monasteries in Hong Kong indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian monasteries in Hong Kong indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian monasteries in Hong Kong indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Christian church directory of the United States" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Christian church directory of the United States and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 9 § Christian church directory of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monarchs in the Americas has been nominated for merging

Category:Monarchs in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Viceroys in Europe has been nominated for merging

Category:Viceroys in Europe has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century rulers in Europe has been nominated for merging

Category:7th-century rulers in Europe has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:8th-century rulers in Europe has been nominated for merging

Category:8th-century rulers in Europe has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century BC rulers has been nominated for merging

Category:6th-century BC rulers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1st-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:1st-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2nd-century women rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:2nd-century women rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 19:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:4th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:5th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:5th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:6th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:7th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:8th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:8th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1st-century BC rulers has been nominated for merging

Category:1st-century BC rulers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:43, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:10th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:11th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:12th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting

Category:12th-century women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:6th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:7th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:8th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:8th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:9th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:9th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:10th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:11th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming

Category:19th-century rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rulers by century has been nominated for renaming

Category:Rulers by century has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kpratter (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Religious calling

An article that you have been involved in editing—Religious calling—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian denominations in the Caribbean indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 21 § Category:12th-century Almohad caliphs on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 12:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Church of God denominations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Church of God denominations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christian organizations established in the 1st century has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]