Talk:First Islamic State

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Former countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles Islam High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Early Muslim C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600) Arab world Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Expedition to Khaybar - Muharram-Safar, 7 AH - May - June 628 [1]
• The Battle of Khaybar: It took place on Safar 5, year 7 H. [2]
• Expedition to Khaybar - Muharram-Safar, 7 AH: May - June 628 [3] [4] <- Good link
• This battle of Khaybar took place at the beginning of the 7th year of the Hijrah. [http://www.islamicdigest.net/v61/content/view/1878/42/
• The Battle of Khaybar was fought in the year 629 ...The battle ended with Muhammad`s victory, which allowed him to gain sufficient money, weapons, and support from local tribes to capture Mecca just 18 months after Khaybar. [5]

The strange part: In Dhu 'l-Hijjah of 8/630 the Battle of Khaybar took place. According to al-Waqidi, this battle took place at the beginning of the 7th year of the Hijrah. [6] --Striver 19:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Striver 19:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the article: "Siege of the Banu Qurayza

   Main article: Siege of the Banu Qurayza

The Banu Qurayza were a Jewish tribe who lived in Medina. The bulk of the tribe's men, apart from a few who converted to Islam, were killed in 627 CE,..." there is unsubstantiated text:"The bulk of the tribe's men, apart from a few who converted to Islam, were killed in 627 CE,...", this text should be removed for NPOV, unless substantiated otherwise. There is no historical or authentic evidence to the allegation:"The bulk of the tribe's men,... were killed in 627 CE, ...". The proven practice of the Prophet was 'forgiveness' whether at the victory of Makkah or elsewhere, as per the authentic Islamic texts of AlQoraan & Hadith. More over there is no principle of 'communal punishment' in Islam, contrary to the western principle, as the aforesaid runs contrary to the God's principle of justice: only the criminals individually carry the burden to their crimes as provided in AlQoraan: "No soul (burden-bearer) shall bear the burden of the other soul (burden-bear)" so innocent cannot be punished with the guilty, otherwise it will be an injustice & not a justice & a travesty of justice. If the aforesaid allegation was true it would have been mentioned in those sources, as all other events have been covered in there. It has been suggested that it is 'Masada' story transposed to the above event by the tribe's later generations & which was carried by that tribe's forefathers when they moved from Palestine to Madina, especially the suggested figures of 600 to 800 & 900 connote to that. The Sirat of the Prophet by Ibn Ishaaq is unauthenticated because he does not verify but includes everything heard by him without authentication so it cannot be used as an authentic source unless corroborated by AlQoraan or Authentic Hadith. At http://www.answering-islam.org.uk/Muhammad/Jews/BQurayza/banu3.html where it is quoted: (In)"The text of Sirat (by Ibn Ishaaq) continues: ... There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900." by an unnamed Christian author of the web-page, who without evidence & maliciously wrongly concludes: "Muhammad's intention was the massacre of the tribe in the case of all three Jewish tribes.", were it so the Prophet would not have offered them the Pact of Madina; they were at wrong by breaching the signed pact by them repeatedly by treachery by treason since Badr, now there was no shadow of doubt & it was in so open since if no further corrective action was taken it would be a travesty of justice & mockery of principles & pacts. [ PS.The writer is referred to for the simple reason that the authentic Hadith are quoted & discussed at length despite the writer's text being completely bigoted, openly hostile with malice & a missionary agenda & not to find the truth, with an unobjectiveness in his attitude, unmanly with no respect for others' opinion & with no courtesy of a writer & no respect for the Muslims for the insulting attitude to the Prophet & Leader of the Muslims] At http://www.haqq.com.au/~salam/misc/qurayza.html , NEW LIGHT ON THE STORY OF BANU QURAYZA AND THE

JEWS OF MEDINA

By W. N. ARAFAT

From Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, (1976), pp. 100-107. the allegation is fully refuted duly evidenced with sources. The Masda Myth is covered at:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/masada.html http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/masadamyth1.htm http://www.jaygary.com/masada.shtml http://www.readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=47059

For reference to the Qoraanic text: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/ http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=1&nAya=1&t=eng For reference to the authentic Hadith text: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/reference/searchhadith.html http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/ http://hadith.al-islam.com/bayan/Index.asp?Lang=ENG&Type=2 http://sahihalbukhari.com/sps/sbk/ http://www.troid.org/ahaadeeth/introduction-to-hadeeth/index.php http://www.geocities.com/embracing_islam/hadeeth.html http://www.understand-islam.net/Articles/HadeethClassification.pdf http://www.islamtomorrow.com/hadeeth/hadeethsearch.htm (can search from contents list of www.usc.edu database) ILAKNA (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:MuhammadSeal.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muhammad in Medina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041203232347/http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/anpt/ejos/pdf4/07Ali.pdf to http://www2.let.uu.nl/Solis/anpt/ejos/pdf4/07Ali.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend changing the name of this page to the "first Islamic State". First of all, it would be useful because this page talks, more than anything, about a type of Polity that preceded the caliphates. As I am not an expert in Islamic history, I am not sure if at some point this State had an "official name" but here, on Wikipedia, there is at least one antecedent that I managed to find in which they already describe it as the "first Islamic State " and that name, although not official, seems useful to me in historiographical term. I leave the link here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_state#:~:text=The%20first%20Islamic%20State%20was,the%20Muslim%20Ummah%20(nation).

An alternative name that I found was State of Medina. That can be added to.

--Bibliotecatdj (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Thank you. Great achievement (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not redirect without reason. Great achievement (talk) 03:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]