User talk:Jklamo
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
If you want to discuss an item-related issue, please use the discussion page of the item and summon me using Template:Reply to.
If you are curious, why I marked item about your company as spam, please consult first Wikidata:Notability (note the second criterion). Note that Wikidata:What Wikidata is not place for self-promotion or advertising/marketing and links to social networks are not considered as serious and publicly available references.
If you are curious, why I marked item about your company as spam, please consult first Wikidata:Notability (note the second criterion). Note that Wikidata:What Wikidata is not place for self-promotion or advertising/marketing and links to social networks are not considered as serious and publicly available references.
 Archives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Capital letters
[edit]Hello Jklamo. I am writing to you because you have created many elements in Wikidata in capital letters, such as Q113464450, Q113464458 and Q113464455, which also sometimes have periods or commas at the end of the name. This is incorrect, could you fix these issues? Thank you. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, these items have capitals in their labels source data - see MEGASIDER ZARAGOZA SAU (Q113464458) and "legal name" at https://search.gleif.org/#/record/549300Q2MPX6F50UHZ17 or "market participant" at https://www.acer-remit.eu/portal/mp-details?ac=A0009878R.ES&tab=1, therefore cannot be described as incorrect. Jklamo (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
So please restore other labels to match consensus (there are more than 60% with "Brunei Darussalam"), not only a few. 87.205.169.187 20:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please discuss at Talk:Q921, there's no reason to fragment the discussion. Jklamo (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
net worth number format
[edit]Hi, do you know why this edit of yours has a strange number format? Adam78 (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Adam78 Hi, note that it's more than 4 years old edit. Apparently it was some software (OpenRefine) imperfection at the time, probably corrected later, currently I don't see any such strange format. Jklamo (talk) 11:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- It was still strange even today, until two minutes ago. Since you didn't mention any particular reason for this extreme precision (to the ten-thousandth of a cent), I've just fixed it. Adam78 (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)