Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 12;14(10):e2000891.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000891. eCollection 2016 Oct.

Orienting the Interaction Compass: Resource Availability as a Major Driver of Context Dependence

Elizabeth G Pringle  1
Affiliations

Orienting the Interaction Compass: Resource Availability as a Major Driver of Context Dependence

Elizabeth G Pringle. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

Life on earth is enormously diverse, in part because each individual engages in countless interactions with its biotic and abiotic environment during its lifetime. Not only are there many such interactions, but any given interaction of each individual with, say, its neighbor or a nutrient could lead to a different effect on its fitness and on the dynamics of the population of which it is a member. Predicting those effects is an enduring challenge to the field of ecology. Using a simple laboratory system, Hoek and colleagues present evidence that resource availability can be a primary driver of variation between interactions. Their results suggest that a complex continuum of interaction outcomes can result from the simple combined effects of nutrient availability and density-dependent population dynamics. The future is rich with potential to integrate tractable experimental systems like theirs with hypotheses derived from studies of interactions in natural communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The interaction compass.
A two-species interaction is illustrated with the terms defining each of the differently signed outcomes; the signs indicate individual fitness or population growth rate. A positive (+) sign thus indicates a positive effect of the interaction on the individual or population, a zero (0) sign indicates no effect, and a negative (–) sign indicates a negative effect. Moving away from the center increases the magnitude of the net effect of the interaction.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mutualism in a community context.
Multispecies interactions can exhibit a greater variety of outcomes than two-way interactions. (A) An interaction in which the mutualism is always obligate (individuals with no mutualist have zero fitness), but some mutualists are better than others at high environmental stress (e.g., as in the coral-algae example). (B) An interaction in which there are multiple mutualists that vary in their cost to the partner. The costly mutualist is more effective, so Mutualist A increases fitness more than Mutualist B when stress is low to intermediate, but the cost of Mutualist A exceeds its benefit when stress is intermediate to high. In this mutualism, unlike in (A), the partner can exist independently of its mutualists and actually does so with higher fitness when environmental stress is very low (resource availability is very high) or stress is very high (resource availability is very low).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bronstein JL. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1994;9(6):214–7. 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ. The evolution of cooperation. Quarterly Review of Biology. 2004;79(2):135–60. 10.1086/383541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Germerodt S, Bohl K, Luck A, Pande S, Schroter A, Kaleta C, et al. Pervasive selection for cooperative cross-feeding in bacterial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(6). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004986 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertness MD, Callaway R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1994;9(5):191–3. 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Bowker MA, Wilson JA, Miller RM. Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(5):2093–8. 10.1073/pnas.0906710107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

LinkOut - more resources