Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;86(3):1163-1188.
doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0000.

Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions

Sarah R Hayford  1 , S Philip Morgan
Affiliations

Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions

Sarah R Hayford et al. Soc Forces. 2008.

Abstract

Using data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we show that women who report that religion is "very important" in their everyday life have both higher fertility and higher intended fertility than those saying religion is "somewhat important" or "not important." Factors such as unwanted fertility, age at childbearing, or degree of fertility postponement seem not to contribute to religiosity differentials in fertility. This answer prompts more fundamental questions: what is the nature of this greater "religiosity"? And why do the more religious want more children? We show that those saying religion is more important have more traditional gender and family attitudes and that these attitudinal differences account for a substantial part of the fertility differential. We speculate regarding other contributing causes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Actual and Intended Total Fertility, By Importance of Religion
Dashed lines=mean intended fertility; solid lines=mean children ever born. Square=religion very important; x=religion somewhat important; triangle=religion not important/no religion. Data: 2002 NSFG. Means weighted using sample weights.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ammerman Nancy T. Religious Identities and Religious Institutions. In: Michele Dillon., editor. Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 207–224.
    1. Bongaarts John. Fertility and Reproductive Preferences in Post-Transitional Societies. Population and Development Review 27. 2001:260–281. (Supplement: Global Fertility Transition)
    1. Bongaarts John. The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World. Population and Development Review. 2002;28(3):419–443.
    1. Bongaarts John, Griffith Feeney. On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility. Population and Development Review. 1998;24(2):271–291.
    1. Bramlett Matthew D, Mosher William D. 22. Vol. 23. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002. Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage in the United States. Vital Health Statistics Series No. 23: - PubMed