Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Feb;91(2):192-4.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.064576.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: legal and ethical aspects

D M Foreman  1
Affiliations
Review

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: legal and ethical aspects

D M Foreman. Arch Dis Child. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains a controversial disorder, despite it now being a well validated clinical diagnosis. Ethical and legal issues are important in determining how doctors should behave in offering a diagnosis or treatment that may generate strong and unpredictable reactions from children, their families, or other agencies. A model for routine ethical practice was proposed, based on three sets of assumptions. Firstly, that ethical practice is consistent with the four principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and respect for autonomy. Secondly, ethical concerns lead to legal processes, whose task is to ensure ethical practice. Thirdly, that we are working in the interests of our patients. Current relevant literature was organised in terms of this model, and recommendations for practice derived from it. Though there is no general ethical problem regarding either the routine diagnosis or treatment of ADHD, ethical difficulties surround some special cases, especially when doctors are working in conjunction with other agencies or coping with non-medical frameworks. Particular care needs to be taken with confidentiality and consent, the limits of which are currently confused. The model worked well with everyday ethical problems, though more difficult cases required careful individual scrutiny.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: the author has received an Unrestricted Educational Grant from Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals to evaluate a nurse led hyperactivity follow up clinic

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R.et al Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. Int Rev Psychiatry 200315185–187. - PubMed
    1. Rowland A S, Lesesne C A, Abramowitz A J. The epidemiology of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder(ADHD): a public health view. Ment Retard Dev D R 20028162–170. - PubMed
    1. Elliott V. Doctors caught in middle of ADHD treatment controversy. American Medical News. 2000. http://www.ama‐assn.org/amednews/2000/11/20/hlsb1120.htm
    1. Beauchamp T L, Childress J F.Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994
    1. Rawls J.A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1985

MeSH terms