Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Apr;22(2):203-14; discussion 214-52.
doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001818.

Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression

Affiliations
Review

Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression

A Campbell. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Apr.

Abstract

Females' tendency to place a high value on protecting their own lives enhanced their reproductive success in the environment of evolutionary adaptation because infant survival depended more upon maternal than on paternal care and defence. The evolved mechanism by which the costs of aggression (and other forms of risk taking) are weighted more heavily for females may be a lower threshold for fear in situations which pose a direct threat of bodily injury. Females' concern with personal survival also has implications for sex differences in dominance hierarchies because the risks associated with hierarchy formation in nonbonded exogamous females are not offset by increased reproductive success. Hence among females, disputes do not carry implications for status with them as they do among males, but are chiefly connected with the acquisition and defence of scarce resources. Consequently, female competition is more likely to take the form of indirect aggression or low-level direct combat than among males. Under patriarchy, men have held the power to propagate images and attributions which are favourable to the continuance of their control. Women's aggression has been viewed as a gender-incongruent aberration or dismissed as evidence of irrationality. These cultural interpretations have "enhanced" evolutionarily based sex differences by a process of imposition which stigmatises the expression of aggression by females and causes women to offer exculpatory (rather than justificatory) accounts of their own aggression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • A feminine advantage in the domain of harm: a review and path forward.
    Graso M, Reynolds T. Graso M, et al. Biol Lett. 2024 Nov;20(11):20240381. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0381. Epub 2024 Nov 13. Biol Lett. 2024. PMID: 39532144 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Behavioral and neural responses to social exclusion in women: the role of facial attractiveness and friendliness.
    Vaillancourt T, van Noordt S, Krygsman A, Brittain H, Davis AC, Palamarchuk IS, Arnocky S, Segalowitz SJ, Crowley MJ, Schmidt LA. Vaillancourt T, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65833-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38956123 Free PMC article.
  • Exploring Attitudes Toward "Sugar Relationships" Across 87 Countries: A Global Perspective on Exchanges of Resources for Sex and Companionship.
    Meskó N, Kowal M, Láng A, Kocsor F, Bandi SA, Putz A, Sorokowski P, Frederick DA, García FE, Aguilar LA, Studzinska A, Tan CS, Gjoneska B, Milfont TL, Topcu Bulut M, Grigoryev D, Aavik T, Boussena M, Mattiassi ADA, Afhami R, Amin R, Baiocco R, Brahim H, Can AR, Carneiro J, Çetinkaya H, Chubinidze D, Deschrijver E, Don Y, Dubrov D, Duyar I, Jovic M, Kamburidis JA, Khan F, Khun-Inkeeree H, Koso-Drljevic M, Lacko D, Massar K, Morelli M, Natividade JC, Nyhus EK, Park JH, Pazhoohi F, Pirtskhalava E, Ponnet K, Prokop P, Šakan D, Tulyakul S, Wang AH, Aquino SD, Atamtürk DD, Burduli N, Chirumbolo A, Dural S, Etchezahar E, Ghahraman Moharrampour N, Aczel B, Kozma L, Lins S, Manunta E, Marot T, Mebarak M, Miroshnik KG, Misetic K, Papadatou-Pastou M, Bakos B, Sahli FZ, Singh S, Solak Ç, Volkodav T, Wlodarczyk A, Akello G, Argyrides M, Çoker O, Galasinska K, Gómez Yepes T, Kobylarek A, Landa-Blanco M, Mayorga M, Özener B, Pacquing MCT, Reyes MES, Şahin A, Tamayo-Agudelo W, Topanova G, Toplu-Demirtaş E, Türkan BN, Zumárraga-Espinosa M, Grassini S, Antfolk J, Cornec C, Pisanski K, Stöckli S, Eder SJ, Han H. Meskó N, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Feb;53(2):811-837. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02724-1. Epub 2023 Dec 21. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38127113 Free PMC article.
  • Perceptions of Income Inequality and Women's Intrasexual Competition.
    Ruder AM, Brase GL, Balboa NJ, Brandner JL, Basha SAJ. Ruder AM, et al. Hum Nat. 2023 Dec;34(4):605-620. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09466-y. Epub 2023 Dec 20. Hum Nat. 2023. PMID: 38114790 Free PMC article.
  • Evidence of the active participation of women in the intergroup conflict based on the use of aggression and cooperation.
    Muñoz-Reyes JA, Torrico-Bazoberry D, Polo P, Figueroa O, Guzmán-Lavín E, Fajardo G, Valenzuela N, Belinchón M, Rodríguez-Sickert C, Pita M. Muñoz-Reyes JA, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 18;13(1):17742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45012-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37853104 Free PMC article.