Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

A. Kamath et al. reply

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 4, pages 786–787 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

The Original Article was published on 20 April 2020

The Original Article was published on 20 April 2020

replying to T. E. Dickins & Q. Rahman Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1187-5 (2020)

replying to J. Clive et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1189-3 (2020)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Monk, J. D., Giglio, E., Kamath, A., Lambert, M. R. & McDonough, C. E. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1622–1631 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickins, T. E. & Rahman, Q. Ancestral primacy of same-sex sexual behaviour does not explain its stable prevalence in modern populations Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1187-5 (2020).

  3. Clive, J., Flintham, E. & Savolainen, V. Understanding same-sex sexual behaviour requires thorough testing rather than reinvention of theory Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1189-3 (2020).

  4. Gowaty, P. A. Sexual terms in sociobiology: emotionally evocative and, paradoxically, jargon. Anim. Behav. 30, 630–631 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vasey, P. L. Homosexual behavior in primates: a review of evidence and theory. Int. J. Primatol. 16, 173–204 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixson, A. in Animal Homosexuality: A Biosocial Perspective (ed. Poiani, A.) 381–400 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  7. MacFarlane, G. R., Blomberg, S. P. & Vasey, P. L. Homosexual behaviour in birds: frequency of expression is related to parental care disparity between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 80, 375–390 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker, G. A. The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a017509–a017509 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey, N. W. & Zuk, M. Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 439–446 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scharf, I. & Martin, O. Y. Same-sex sexual behavior in insects and arachnids: prevalence, causes, and consequences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 1719–1730 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han, C. S. & Brooks, R. C. Same-sex sexual behaviour as a by-product of reproductive strategy under male–male scramble competition. Anim. Behav. 108, 193–197 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoskins, J. L., Ritchie, M. G. & Bailey, N. W. A test of genetic models for the evolutionary maintenance of same-sex sexual behaviour. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20150429 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoving, H.-J. T., Fernández-Álvarez, F. Á., Portner, E. J. & Gilly, W. F. Same-sex sexual behaviour in an oceanic ommastrephid squid, Dosidicus gigas (Humboldt squid). Mar. Biol. 166, 33 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Engel, K. C., Männer, L., Ayasse, M. & Steiger, S. Acceptance threshold theory can explain occurrence of homosexual behaviour. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140603 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gavrilets, S. & Rice, W. R. Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 3031–3038 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64, 1865–1884 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Ambika Kamath

  2. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Ambika Kamath & Max R. Lambert

  3. Center for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA

    Caitlin E. McDonough

  4. School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Julia D. Monk

  5. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Erin Giglio

Authors
  1. Ambika Kamath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caitlin E. McDonough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julia D. Monk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Max R. Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erin Giglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K., C.E.M., J.D.M., M.R.L. and E.G. conceived of and developed the ideas in this manuscript. All authors wrote and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia D. Monk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamath, A., McDonough, C.E., Monk, J.D. et al. A. Kamath et al. reply. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 786–787 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1188-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1188-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing