maddutchy
Joined Aug 2004
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings34
maddutchy's rating
Reviews20
maddutchy's rating
After watching two episodes, I am really hoping the writing improves. Why do writers create characters(in this case, Talon) that are supposed to be smart and skilled but make them so dumb? Talon is the sole survivor of a race that was ordered eradicated by the people in charge in her world. She supposedly survived to adulthood by her wits and ability. Why then is she portrayed as continually doing stupid things? I have no complaint with the actors. They are doing their job well as it is given them by the writers and director. Talon is all alone, traveling casually(1st mistake) through known dangerous territory and is saved by a knight. Instead of working with him(a survival strategy) she blows him off. She helps another woman with powerful connections and instead of accepting her friendship, blows her off. She nearly dies in a sword fight but is saved by the "smith" who tells her he knows important things about her future and past. The natural survival decision would be to accept his help and shelter while she recovers and learn things about her past that are important. What does she do? She blows him off too even though she is so weak that she can barely walk(BIG normally fatal mistake). She finds another 'friend' in the Brewer who helps her heal and at great risk to himself shelters her and what does she do - bails on him! The character, who is supposed to be a survivor, alone and on a quest of revenge, disdains potential allies, who have proved their potential value to her, and acts like a spoiled brat around everyone else. This by someone that should be keeping a profile so low as to be subterranean. Talon is supposed to be smart, skilled and independent. SO WRITE HER THAT WAY! I will give this a few more episodes to see if it improves but doubt it will be picked up for more than are already 'in the can'. A shame because the actors and audience deserve better. My advice to the actors is to start looking for new projects now because you deserve better than you are being provided.
I caught this one on one of the movie channels. This is a well directed and played movie. I would place it in the horror/mystery category with the emphasis on horror. It uses the time honored device of buildup, buildup, release then impact to shock the audience. It is well worth seeing for horror fans. This is also an example of how when a story idea is shopped around 'Hollywood' that the general idea is used in more than one movie. Being as "Intruders" and "Don't Breathe" were released a year apart, I won't speculate on who came first in the story concept. This one is more horror while "Intruders" is more mystery/suspense. Both feature outstanding performances by the female lead and somewhat vague endings. Both feature similar but not matching situations. I was impressed by this movie but enjoyed "Intruders" more just because I don't need my heart rate increased by horror movies so much anymore. If I could state a one sentence comparison: "Intruders" is smarter while "Don't Breathe" scarier. Stephen Lang delivers another great performance. For horror fans it deserves 10 stars but for me it gets 8 because it is too scary for an old codger like me. Lang and Levy both deserve 10s.
This one surprised me. It was taunt, well-directed, paced well and the actors did outstanding work. Beth Reisgraf as Anna was amazing! She sold the character so well. On a scale of 1 to 10, I wanted to give this one a 20! Nothing is given away until the right moment in the action. There is death and violence but it is not out of place for the plot. The director is to be complimented for keeping the story well paced and without any of the characters having to act stupid to make the story work. I liked the movie so much that I immediately ordered a copy from Amazon. It is worth it.