|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0691189641
| 9780691189642
| B07YYR6F4V
| 4.15
| 843
| Apr 07, 2020
| Apr 07, 2020
|
it was ok
|
"We were stuck on the bottom. Batteries were running low. Our air was running out. We had no way to communicate to the other submersible or to the tea
"We were stuck on the bottom. Batteries were running low. Our air was running out. We had no way to communicate to the other submersible or to the team on the boat some 10,000 feet above us. We were nestled in the metal sphere of our tiny submersible, perched on some rocks at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean..." Despite its catchy title and being excited to see where the author would take the book, I ultimately put it down ~midway through, which is something I rarely do... Author Kevin Peter Hand is an astrobiologist and planetary scientist at JPL. He is also the founder of Cosmos Education and was its president until 2007. Kevin Peter Hand : [image] I recently decided to pull the plug on books that I am not enjoying instead of just trudging through. I was not prepared to spend any more time on this one. While the book contains a ton of interesting data and other factual info, the writing here bored me to tears. Now, fault me all you will for being a finicky reader, but I need my books to be decently engaging and readable. Say whatever you want, but just don't bore me... Science books - broadly speaking - can be delineated into two broad-based categories. The first sees the author rattle off factoid after factoid in a never-ending torrent of obscure minutia, often losing the reader completely. The second makes the science accessible to even the layperson, and keeps the book interesting enough that the reader will likely retain much of its information long after they put it down. Sadly, this book was an example of the former and not the latter... ****************** I'm sorry to say that this one just did not resonate with me. The author has no doubt done some great work in this field, and I'm sure many people will get great value from the book. Sadly, I was not among them, and my ratings need to reflect my level of enjoyment. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0393355578
| 9780393355574
| 0393355578
| 3.97
| 13,101
| Feb 07, 2017
| Feb 20, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us h
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us healthier, more creative, more empathetic and more apt to engage with the world and with each other. Nature, it turns out, is good for civilization." I really enjoyed The Nature Fix. It was a very well-done book; all around. The author did a great job in the research, writing, editing and final presentation of the material. As society becomes more prosperous, larger numbers of people leave the countryside and head for the economic opportunities offered in metropolitan areas. Also, in a broad-based trend across all Western and non-Western advanced countries, people are been spending less time outdoors and immersing themselves in nature. In what is likely an evolutionary mismatch, this broad change will have wide-ranging effects on the population at large. Author Florence Williams is an American journalist and nonfiction writer whose work focuses on the environment, health and science. Florence Williams: [image] Williams opens the book with a good intro, where she talks about biologist E.O. Wilson's concept of "biophilia." She writes with a decent style, and this one should have no trouble keeping the finicky reader engaged. "Biophilia explains why even today we build houses on the lake, why every child wants a teddy bear, and why Apple names itself after a fruit and its software after noble predators, surfing spots and national parks. The company is brilliant at instilling biophilic longing and affiliation at the very same time it lures us inside." She continues: "This book explores the science behind what poets and philosophers have known for eons: place matters. Aristotle believed walks in the open air clarified the mind. Darwin, Tesla and Einstein walked in gardens and groves to help them think. Teddy Roosevelt, one of the most hyperproductive presidents of all time, would escape for months to the open country. On some level they all fought a tendency to be “tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people” as hikerphilosopher John Muir put it in 1901." And outlines the structure of the book's contents in this quote: "I’ve divided the book into five parts to help make sense of the material, and to make it useful. The first part sets up the two dominant theories that attempt to explain why our brains need nature and that drive much of the research: the first chapter takes us to Japan, where researchers are quantifying nature’s role in lowering stress and boosting mental health using a framework based on the biophilia hypothesis, the idea that we feel most “at home” in nature because we evolved there. The second chapter swerves over to Utah, where American neuroscientists are more interested in how nature helps restore our attention-addled brains to a state of sharper cognition. I’ve organized the rest of the book by nature dose. I explore the immediate effects of quick bursts, or “nearby nature” on our three main senses—smell, sound, sight. Then I look at what happens to our brains and bodies when we hang outside a bit longer to approximate the Finnish recommended nature dose: five hours a month. In Part Four, I take a deeper, longer dive into the wilderness, where really interesting things happen to our brains. This is where, in the words of neuroscientist David Strayer at the University of Utah, “something profound is going on.” Finally, we’ll look at what it all means to the way most of us live, in cities." Some more of what the author covers here includes: • The Japanese practice of "shinrin yoku," or “forest bathing” • The three different brain networks: the executive network, the spatial network, and the default network • Official healing forests in South Korea • Aromatherapy • The effects of persistent noise pollution • The positive effects of listening to nature sounds: wind, water and birds • Fractals • The Finnish; their connection to nature • Scotland • The positive effects of exercise • Wilderness, Creativity and the Power of Awe • Water on the Brain • The effects of time in nature on young brains • The importance of trees ****************** The Nature Fix. was a well-done book . I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 31, 2024
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1642504157
| 9781642504156
| 1642504157
| 3.85
| 196
| Mar 2021
| Mar 30, 2021
|
liked it
|
"Science Let this word simmer in your mind for a moment. Examine every texture. Taste the nuance. What does this word make you think of? How does it m
"Science Let this word simmer in your mind for a moment. Examine every texture. Taste the nuance. What does this word make you think of? How does it make you feel?" Is This Wi-Fi Organic? was a decent book on science communication. I have watched a few videos by the author on his YouTube channel, and thought I'd check out his book. While most of the content was well done, I had a few small points of contention. More below. Author Dave Farina received a BA in chemistry from Carleton College, and performed graduate studies in both synthetic organic chemistry and science education at Cal State Northridge, receiving an MA in the latter. He is best known for his above-mentioned YouTube channel: "Professor Dave Explains," where he has over 3 million subscribers. Dave Farina: [image] As the book's title cheekily hints at; the writing in the book proper attempts to dispel common misconceptions about science. The average layperson has roughly zero knowledge of many basic scientific principles and are functionally scientifically illiterate. Books like this are important, to help these people familiarize themselves with some of the basics. There is a large-scale distrust and misunderstanding of science, and what it is, especially since the recent debacle of how COVID was handled. Many people have lost trust in science. Science communicators like the author are important to help push back against much of the irrationality that has bubbled up into the public arena in the age of a democratized internet. The author opens the book with the quote above, and it continues below: "Do you imagine futuristic cityscapes? Do you feel hopeful? Do you picture billowing smokestacks? Do you feel terrified? Does it remind you of school? Does that hold a positive or negative connotation for you? Farina writes with an effective style here, and I found the book to be very readable. I am admittedly very picky about how engaging my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. The audio book version I have was also read by author, and I felt he did a great job of this, too. Farina speaks to the nature of the problem in this quote: "Prior to the internet, there were sources of information that were unanimously agreed upon to be trustworthy and reliable. Stories published by newspapers had to be heavily researched by professional journalists. Knowledge from an encyclopedia was not questioned by those who needed to reference a fact, because they were written by top specialists in every discipline, which contributed to their considerable cost. Whether we regard them as good or bad, those times are gone, and they are never coming back. Unlike the encyclopedias of old, the quality of information on the internet is not reliable. It ranges from outstanding to abysmal. For this reason, the internet can serve as a magic mirror, a place where people go to confirm pre-existing bias. Outlets that reflect what we already “know” are correct and trustworthy. Those that do not are ignored, deemed fraudulent, deceitful, paid for by malevolent institutions, or worse. This method of assessment rarely has any respect for the qualifications of those who produce the content we encounter, which has led to what is popularly referred to as the “post-truth era.” The writing in the book proper starts with Farina giving the reader a lesson in some basic chemistry. He continues on into organic chemistry, before talking about health and wellness. The rest of the contents of the book include: • What Are All These Lines and Hexagons? • The Death of Vitalism • Natural vs. Synthetic (Tackling Chemophobia) • The Molecules of Life • The Molecular Basis of Wellness • The Rise of the Alt-Health Industry • The Body as Machine • Recognizing Science-Based Medicine • Biotechnology and the Future of the Species • Energy Defined • An Equation for This and an Equation for That • To Debunk Is Divine • Science and Industry in an Educated World Ok, on to my gripes. Early on, he says that Schedule 1 drugs are "... a classification reserved for the most addictive drugs we are aware of." That's not what Schedule 1 means. According to The DEA, which designates drugs, Schedule 1 drugs are drugs "with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse." Also, he goes on to say right after that: "There is no evidence to support the notion that marijuana is addictive at all." This is not true. Any behaviour or substance which taps into the reward system has the potential for addiction. Anything that lights up the dopamine circuitry in the brain can become addictive. See Anna Lembke's book Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence for more. He also says that diet can't help treat cancer. Cancer is heavily correlated with inflammation. Someone's diet can be pro or anti-inflammatory. Certain compounds like turmeric can possibly up or down-regulate oncogenes and tumour-suppressing genes. Additionally, Paul Stamets has done some work on the polysaccharide compounds found in turkey Tail mushrooms; showing 7 different possible mechanisms of anti-cancer action. Japan also has used Turkey Tail derived PSK compounds in their mainstream oncology treatments for a few decades now. Farina is just not qualified to make blanket statements like this. No one is, really. Biochemistry is incredibly complex... Finally, in a case of hilariously tragic irony in a book about magical thinking, he closes the writing here with some magical thinking of his own. He has an airy-fairy epilogue where he chastises celebrity worship, consumerism, and other aspects of human nature. Unfortunately, celebrity worship is an evolutionary mismatch that has been baked into human psychology since time immemorial. To evolve and thrive in a cohesive tribe, people have always looked up to those they perceive as having higher social status than they do. Mindless consumerism just hijacks the basic biological desire for greed, and its related dopaminergic circuitry to accumulate as many possessions as possible in a world of scarcity. Additionally, consumerism has been a chief driver of innovation and invention. If there were no organic demand for new products and technologies, then there would be no incentive to produce them in the first place. So, much, or even most of our new technology can largely be attributed to the human desire for novelty and innovation expressed through consumerism. ****************** Is This Wi-Fi Organic? was a good short read, despite the minor criticisms above. Farina did a great job conveying complicated technical information in a manner that should be accessible to even the scientifically illiterate layperson. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
Jul 27, 2024
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1760987530
| 9781760987534
| B094HRG53V
| 4.21
| 1,129
| Jun 24, 2021
| Aug 10, 2021
|
it was ok
|
"WE HUMANS ARE OFTEN DESCRIBED as sentient beings, but what does this mean?" Although I was excited to start Sentient, the writing here really fell fla "WE HUMANS ARE OFTEN DESCRIBED as sentient beings, but what does this mean?" Although I was excited to start Sentient, the writing here really fell flat for me. More below. Author Jackie Higgins is a graduate of Oxford University with an MA in zoology and has worked for Oxford Scientific Films for over a decade, along with National Geographic, PBS Nova, and the Discovery Channel. She has also written, directed, and produced films at the BBC Science Department. She lives in London. Jackie Higgins: [image] Unfortunately, Higgins writes in a style that is somewhat stereotypical of British prose. I found much of this book's writing to be extremely dry and long-winded. I found my finicky attention wandering numerous times here. I was close to putting the book down more than a few times. I am admittedly very particular about how readable my books are, and this one really missed the mark for me... She drops this quote early on, about the concept of sentience: "The word, from the Latin sentire, to feel, is so mercurial that the philosopher Daniel Dennett has, perhaps playfully, suggested, “Since there is no established meaning… we are free to adopt one of our own choosing.” Some use sentience interchangeably with the word consciousness, a phenomenon that in itself is so elusive as to reduce the most stalwart scientific mind to incantations of magic. ****************** While the book covers some super-interesting subject matter, the telling of it fell way short for my tastes. I did not enjoy the overall presentation of this one. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jul 02, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
B0CVBJV3ZF
| 3.75
| 483
| unknown
| Mar 14, 2024
|
did not like it
|
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented h
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented here; mainly early on, there were some fairly sizeable structural problems with the overall presentation. More below. Co-author Kyler Shumway a professional writer, and psychotherapy practice developer. Co-author Daniel Wendler, MA is a doctoral student in Clinical Psychology and the founder of MarketingforTherapists.org. Kyler Shumway & Daniel Wendler: [image] The book is an audio presentation, so I won't be including the quotes I typically add to my reviews. It is also a shorter presentation; clocking in at a little less than 3 hours. As the books title implies, the authors unfold a theory of neurodiversity. Although not summarized exactly this way here (and it should have been); the theory is that modern science does not know enough about the workings of the human brain to be able to tell what "normal" neural functioning looks like, compared with pathological functioning. The authors talk about ADHD and autism a lot in the first part of the book, using these case studies to explain how people are differently wired. Ok, so all good so far. Right up until they started editorializing... The authors are self-loathing leftist "progressives" who subscribe to Neo-Marxist "intersectionality." They have been thoroughly parasitized by the Woke Mind Virus. And, as is oh-so fashionable in 2024, they spare no opportunity to push their political narrative here; with frustrating results. Many people on the autistic spectrum don't behave according to social norms. Autism is primarily a disorder associated with reduced empathy, so autistic people often miss the social cues that non-autistic people take for granted in their interactions with others. The authors talk about the "harm" caused by people trying to "mask" these abnormal behaviours; making a victimology claim. This may be true, but people are social animals. Every aspect of human behavior is strongly influenced by culture. All of our expectations, behaviours, decisions, and habits are strongly influenced by the group. Every society has norms and taboos. They are a foundational part of any social group. The authors don't seem to like this, and use magical thinking to wish that this wasn't so. Encouraging autistic people to behave normally may cause them some distress, but encouraging them to not conform also has downsides. Namely; rejection and ostracism from the group; which is arguably more damaging than having to internalize your abnormal behaviour. It's not a black and white issue... Ridiculously enough, these authors think that it is the entire world and the majority of people that need to change to accommodate everyone's specific preferences, and not the other way around. How would this even work in practice?? By definition, you can't please every minority group there is, because for every special need or preference that you accommodate, you'll end up displeasing someone else's needs or accommodations. This is not a feasible strategy. These two accredited academics don't seem to realize this obvious reality. Also, unfortunately, there was a plethora of leftist newspeak in here. Terms like "starting a conversation" "creating space," "marginalized," and other assorted ideological language was liberally peppered in the writing. I really don't like political language in a book, as it typically indicates that the author has been ideologically captured. And these guys clearly have been. They've got a ridiculous bit of writing saying "when we give someone the "psychosis" label, it makes it ok for the police to haul them off to jail." Umm, no. People are not just carted off to jail for no reason. They are taken to jail for criminal behaviour. If a psychotic person is arrested, it is because they are a threat to themselves or others. What should we do when someone who is detached from reality (the definition of a psychotic episode) is posing a danger to society? Just leave them alone and hope for the best?? This is airy-fairy utopian nonsense. Interestingly, most normal people wouldn't advocate for such nonsense. It takes a certain amount of education to become so stupid. “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them...” The authors also have some garbage in here about gender ideology. They trot out the fact that there are intersex people as "evidence" for the fact that sex and gender are completely uncorrelated. Human beings are sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing creatures, with 2 default phenotypes. The binary idea of sex is not flawed. The overwhelming majority of people are either XX or XY. Even when intersex and sex chromosome aneuploidies are taken into account, M-F still applies to ~99.9% of the population. They also mention that brain scans show that the brains of trans people more closely resemble the brains of the sex they identify as, and cis people's brains more typically resemble the brains of their biological sex. The first problem with the entire "brain scan" line is thinking that there is a "male brain" and a "female brain." There are effeminate men, and there are masculine women. The amount of overlap between the brains of the sexes is so vast that trying to dichotomize the two is not workable. Disposition is not "gender." Dr. Kenneth Zucker, one of the world's leading gender researchers has a great bit of writing about this in Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. They trot out some stats that say that >20% of Gen Z, >10% of millennials, 4.2% of Gen X and only 2.6% of Baby Boomers identify as LGBT+. The authors say that this discrepancy is reflective of stigma. It doesn't seem to occur to them that this parabolic rise in these numbers over the last few decades may also have social influence as a causal factor. We get the result we want first, and then go backwards to establish causation. Great "science," guys. They've also got a bit of writing in here about obtaining "enthusiastic consent" for sex. What the fuck does this have to do with neurodiversity?? Answer: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. But, much like an evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves. Ideology is a hell of a drug, kids... Sadly, ideologues ramming their shit political takes down your throat has spilled out of academia and Hollywood, and is becoming more and more commonplace in books... ****************** I had high hopes for Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal, but it ultimately fell way short. I would not recommend it. There's not much real value here. Instead of using the <3 hours of this book's runtime to talk about the science of neurodiversity, the authors spend most of this short time evangelizing for a worldview. How tiresome... 1 star, and off to the return bin. Remind me to give a hard pass on anything else these guys produce. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Audible Audio
| |||||||||||||||||
1250288355
| 9781250288356
| 1250288355
| 3.64
| 560
| Feb 2024
| Feb 20, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"Though it may be easy to find information about animal sex in one place, birdsong in another, the first vaccine in yet another, and the science of th
"Though it may be easy to find information about animal sex in one place, birdsong in another, the first vaccine in yet another, and the science of the hangover in a fourth, it’s much more difficult to find in-depth, quirky content about multiple scientific subjects in one spot. Therefore, we think this book will fill that void of underservedness. With plenty of quirkiness and silliness along the way..." I was in the mood for something a little lighter than the books I typically read, so I thought I'd give How to Win Friends and Influence Fungi a go. While there was some interesting info here, I didn't really enjoy the overall presentation very much. More below. Author Chris Balakrishnan founded Nerd Nite when he was a graduate student in evolutionary biology at Boston University. Nerd Nite was born of a Boston bar owner’s curiosity about Chris’ ornithological adventures and Chris’ goal of making science more accessible. Chris Balakrishnan: [image] The book is presented as a collection of numerous short essays; across a wide swathe of territory. The presentation was supposed to be funny. Unfortunately, I didn't laugh once. Usually, I appreciate the narration of audiobooks. Unfortunately (again), some of these narrators began to grate on me as the book went on. The presenters have a habit of speaking in an overly exaggerated tone, and frequently uptalk - sort of how you might speak to a 2-year-old. The writing here is also full of talk about sex, which is not really my cup of tea. Also, for a fun science book, there was a baffling amount of pro-LGBT propaganda crammed in here. Nowadays, you can't even pick up a science book without being force-fed THE MESSAGE. It seems you can't escape this crap no matter where you go... SIGH Instead of just sticking to telling amusing scientific stories and anecdotes, many of these presenters take the opportunity to evangelize for their leftist "progressive" worldview here, instead. I really, really dislike when authors cram their shit-tier political opinions into books where they have no business being, and my ratings always reflect this. In a super-cringey attempt to make a funny, one of these lobotomized authors proclaims: "...if you care about teens, don't ever vote for a Republican." Oh, wow. Cool opinion. Thanks for sharing. Maybe just stick to talking about science next time? There was also more nonsense in here about how biological sex is on a spectrum. That some animals have different chromosomal characteristics than people do is trotted out as "evidence." Human beings are sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing creatures, with 2 default phenotypes. The binary idea of sex is not flawed. The overwhelming majority of people are either XX or XY. Even when intersex and sex chromosome aneuploidies are taken into account, M-F still applies to ~99.9% of the population. Later in the book, another lobotomized scientist talks about the dangers of tribalism, noting that there has been a rise in (gasp) nationalism, and pearl clutches over the election of Jair Bolsonaro. Strangely enough, no mention was made of the danger of wide-sweeping far-leftist sentiment: the literal Neo-Marxist movements sweeping across college campuses, and the violent riots of summer 2020, to name but a few. On a positive note, there was a good bit of writing here about GMO foods. ****************** Despite being excited to start this one, How to Win Friends and Influence Fungi ultimately was a disappointment. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 16, 2024
|
May 21, 2024
|
May 16, 2024
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||
1089449186
| 9781089449188
| 1089449186
| 4.16
| 45
| unknown
| Aug 10, 2019
|
liked it
|
"...Also called biostimulation, light box therapy, low-level light therapy (LLLT), or Photobiomodulation, Red Light Therapy or treatment has gained po
"...Also called biostimulation, light box therapy, low-level light therapy (LLLT), or Photobiomodulation, Red Light Therapy or treatment has gained popularity. Although the therapy is what we would consider “alternative,” many are swearing by it and using it to enhance wellbeing, promote recovery after surgery, minimize the effects of aging (to reduce wrinkles), and for various other personal wellbeing ends including but not limited to improved hair growth, easing sore muscles, dry skin, winter depression, and even weight loss." Red Light Therapy was a somewhat decent introductory look into the topic, but I had some gripes. More below. The book is my fourth on the subject of red light therapy, properly known as "photobiomodulation," or "PBM." Although the topic of red light therapy first struck me as woo-woo, new-age mumbo-jumbo, there have been thousands of scientific studies done on it, and the FDA currently approves its usage to treat myriad conditions. Anecdotally speaking; I recently purchased my own LED device. I was extremely skeptical that I would ever see any positive results from this therapy. However, immediately after my first 20 minute session, I felt an incredible surge of energy. I have seen some incredible results so far, despite having used PBM for less than 2 weeks now. The book is a very short presentation. The version I have clocked in at only 52 pages. Although the author breezes through most of the relevant material, a deeper look was warranted. The topics covered in the book are: • PBM Benefits for the Skin • PBM Enhances Sleep • PBM Has Weight Loss Benefits • PBM Enhances Muscle Recovery and Performance • PBM Improves Inflammation and Joint Pain • Red Light Therapy at Home • Choosing an RLT Device • PBM dose guidelines Although the author references many scientific studies here, she uses unscientific and incorrect language quite often. She has a rather awkward writing style that could use some refinement. For example, she drops this borderline word salad: "...Red light and near-infrared wavelengths is not harmful because treatments occur in a controlled environment such as a licensed spa or medical center, or even using a high-grade red light device at home. This means the chances of the light wavelengths generated by pure red light burning the skin are very dismal."~Whether something is harmful to you has nothing to do with where it has been administered. Also, "dismal" is not a scientifically quantitative term. She also mentions "detoxing" in the book. Aside from discontinuing usage of addictive substances, "detoxing" is a nonsensical pseudoscientific term. There is no such thing as doing a "detox." Your body "detoxifies" itself constantly. This is what your liver and kidneys are for... ******************** Red Light Therapy was an OK primer to the topic. However, I would recommend a better-written and researched book to anyone wanting to familiarize themselves with PBM. Check out Ari Whitten's book: The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy: How to Use Red and Near-Infrared Light Therapy for Anti-Aging, Fat Loss, Muscle Gain, Performance Enhancement, and Brain Optimization. It was a far more comprehensive and coherent look into the topic. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 09, 2024
|
May 07, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
B084MNJ4HR
| 3.64
| 14
| unknown
| Apr 28, 2020
|
really liked it
|
"In the past few years, red and near-infrared light therapy has exploded in popularity—the treatment seems to be everywhere, from the doctor’s office
"In the past few years, red and near-infrared light therapy has exploded in popularity—the treatment seems to be everywhere, from the doctor’s office to the salon. It’s received high praise from the press, too: Glamour calls it a “fountain of youth”; Shape insists you make it a part of your skin-care routine; and Men’s Journal praises its sleep, strength and endurance training, and post-workout recovery benefits. It certainly seems like this painless, side effect– free treatment could be the medical breakthrough we’ve been waiting for..." Healing with Red Light Therapy was a great introduction to the topic of red light therapy; properly known as "photobiomodulation," or "PBM" from here on. The book is my third on the topic, and I'll read just about everything I can get my hands on about PBM. The author did a decent job putting this one together. Author Stephanie Hallett is a Toronto-born journalist. A graduate of the University of British Columbia’s Master of Journalism program, she has worked as a reporter and editor at Ms. magazine, HuffPost, and HelloGiggles, and has had her work published by Pacific Standard, BuzzFeed, Modern Luxury Brides California, DAME magazine, and more. Stephanie Hallett: [image] Although the topic of red light therapy first struck me as woo-woo, new-age mumbo-jumbo, there have been thousands of scientific studies done on it, and the FDA currently approves its usage to treat myriad conditions. Anecdotally speaking; I recently purchased my own LED device. I was extremely skeptical that I would ever see any positive results from this therapy. However, immediately after my first 20 minute session, I felt an incredible surge of energy. I have seen some incredible results so far, despite having used PBM for less than 2 weeks now The quote from the start of this review continues: "...Red light therapy has been around for decades, since the advent of lasers in the 1960s. Currently, there are dozens of FDA-cleared red and near-infrared light therapy devices on the market, mainly for skin care and aches and pains. Some estimates suggest that the light therapy market, including white light devices for seasonal affective disorder and devices of other colors, will reach $1 billion worldwide by 2025." She lays out the aim of the book in this short blurb: "The goal of this book is twofold: to inform and inspire curiosity and action. Because light therapy can seem like magic—how, after all, can a form of energy have healing effects on the human body?—this book lays out in plain language the science of this treatment and its possible results. It does not diagnose or treat, but it does explain which conditions respond best to light therapy and how to seek it out." And talks about the empirical validation of PBM as an effective therapeutic, as well as one of it's mechanisms of actions in this short quote: "More than 4,000 PBM lab studies have been conducted, as well as about 700 clinical trials. In total, more than 6,000 papers have been published on the subject—nearly 500 in 2018 alone, signaling a rising interest in the treatment. For all the skeptics out there, she drops this quote, which I found pretty witty: "PBM is also effective at treating wounds and illnesses in animals, which seems relevant to the conversation since there’s no such thing as a placebo effect in animals. As Dr. Praveen Arany, a PBM researcher at the University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, explained to me, “Animals do not have placebo. They do not pretend to get better because you’re shining light on them.” Take that, PBM skeptics." Unfortunately, despite covering many of the benefits of PBM, the author doesn't spend any time talking about the different wavelengths of light that are used. She just advises the reader to look into it for themselves. Well, isn't that why people bought this book? FWIW, I have read in other books on PBM that the two most therapeutic wavelengths are ~660nm red and ~850nm near infrared. ******************** Healing with Red Light Therapy was an interesting look into the topic. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 4 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 07, 2024
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 03, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
B07FJNZ821
| 4.15
| 840
| Jul 09, 2018
| Jul 09, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
"If there were a pill that was proven to have powerful anti-aging effects on our skin, combat neurological disease, fight depression and anxiety, incr
"If there were a pill that was proven to have powerful anti-aging effects on our skin, combat neurological disease, fight depression and anxiety, increase fat loss, speed recovery from exercise, increase strength and endurance, combat certain autoimmune conditions, fight hair loss, and speed healing from injury—all with little to no side effects—it would be a billion-dollar blockbuster drug..." The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy was an excellent look into the topic. Although I read quite a lot of books and watch many of the podcasts from the world's leading practitioners in the health and wellness sphere, I had not come across the topic of red light therapy (properly known as photbiomodulation or from here on PBM) until recently - when I happened to be listening to the "Quirks and Quarks" science podcast on my way to the store a few weeks ago. What I heard there really had me thinking afterward. Basically, the professor said that modern humans aren't exposed to as much red and infrared light as when life was spent mainly outdoors, resulting in somewhat of an evolutionary mismatch. (from the Quirks and Quarks website): "The global transition to LED lighting seems to be having some concerning impacts on the natural world and human health. These energy efficient artificial lights produce different spectra than older incandescent technology, or the natural light of the Sun that life on Earth evolved with over billions of years. LED lighting is brighter, bluer, and more widely used than incandescent lighting. Author Ari Whitten is a natural health expert who takes an evidence-based approach to human energy optimization. He has a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology, certifications from the National Academy of Sports Medicine as a Corrective Exercise Specialist and Performance Enhancement Specialist, has extensive graduate-level training in Clinical Psychology, and holds a Master of Science degree in Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine. Ari Whitten: [image] The writing here is very heavily annotated, and the author references many different scientific papers. However, even though this book is a science-driven look into the topic, Whitten writes in a very straightforward, down-to-earth manner that manages to convey technical scientific jargon to the reader in an easily digestible manner. Even the scientifically illiterate layperson should have no trouble understanding what is presented here. Points awarded for this effective communication, because all too often, science books fail at just this. They drown the reader in a virtual never-ending torrent of esoteric minutia; effectively losing the forest for the trees... The quote from the start of this review continues below: "...Hundreds of millions of people would be told to start taking it by their doctors every day. And doctors all over the world would call it a “miracle drug.” Whitten lays out the aim of the book in this bit of writing: "In this book, you’ll discover the incredible power of red and near-infrared light therapy and how it can help: Far from being some new age airy-fairy, tree-hugging pseudoscience, the evidence for the efficacy of PBM on the body is well scientifically grounded: "There have now been literally thousands of studies conducted upon both animals and humans. Overall, red light has been repeatedly shown to have positive effects on cell function in animal and human studies and aid in improving a wide range of conditions, improving health in numerous ways. Red and near-infrared (NIR) light therapy devices have been FDA-approved for several purposes so far, including anti-aging, hair-loss reversal, acne treatment, pain relief, slow to heal wounds, fat loss, among other purposes. (This is worth noting as it proves the abundance of research showing benefits—the therapy has to be proven safe and effective in numerous trials to gain FDA approval.)" Whitten references Michael R. Hamblin et al.’s 2018 textbook "Low-Level Light Therapy: Photobiomodulation" many times here, and says that Hamblin is one of the world's leading scientists on the topic of photobiomodulation. Click here to read a decent article from him about PBM and its scientific veracity on PubMed. Having recently purchased a moderately-priced LED red/NIR unit myself, I can (so far) attest to this therapeutic's powerful effects. To be honest, I was extremely skeptical that I would feel any measurable benefit; immediately, or even long-term. However, after my first ~20 minute session, I felt a huge surge of energy, which lasted the rest of the day. At the gym later that afternoon, I had much more energy than I typically do. Anecdotally speaking, and as I write this review, I have only been doing the PBM therapy for about a week now, but in that short time, I have noticed that: 1) I no longer feel lethargic, and/or tired in the early afternoon anymore. Around 1 pm I'm usually ready for a nap, 2) Overall, my mood is much more improved. I am generally in a more positive frame of mind, and have less anxiety and depressive thoughts. I am less inclined towards negative self-talk and recursive thinking. 3) I have an increased level of energy at the gym, as well, which has led to me breaking some long-held personal strength records, as a middle-aged man who is not taking any AAS, 4) I train very hard at the gym; both cardio (to improve Vo2 Max) as well as strength train. I lift very heavy. Typically, this results in some pretty serious soreness/ DOMS in the day or two following my workouts. The PBM has dramatically reduced the amount of soreness I experience afterwards, 5) My skin also appears markedly more radiant and flush. Subjectively speaking, people have told me that my wrinkles appear to have diminished noticeably, 6) As part of the biochemical process that PBM produces in the body, I really feel the pump from the increase in nitric oxide (NO). The author spends quite a bit of time covering many of the proposed benefits of PBM, as well as their potential mechanisms of action. All the writing is heavily annotated. He also talks the reader through calculating the optimal dosage, and notes that (contrary to what you might read elsewhere) PBM is a very potent therapy that's easy to overdo. PBM has a biphasic dose response curve, so more is not necessarily better. In fact, too much can actually be deleterious: [image] Near the end of the book, he covers a few of the more popular home devices for sale, and makes recommendations to the reader. He says that the two most evidentially-supported therapeutic wavelengths are somewhere around 660nm, and 850nm. He advises the reader to select a device that has a power output of between ~25-100 mW/cm2. [image] If I were to fault this book, I would note that the author spends quite a bit of time talking about "EMFs" and "detecting EMFs" coming from PBM devices. The entire topic of "EMF sensitivity" is pseudoscientific nonsense. People aren't "sensitive to EMFs." Their supposed sensitivities never hold up to empirical blind testing. There is no known biological mechanism for non-ionizing EMFs (i.e. power lines, cellphones, and wifi) to cause DNA damage, and thus cancer. EMF "sensitivity" is a psychosomatic disorder. ******************** The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy was an excellent and comprehensive look into the topic. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested in learning about the potential benefits of photobiomodulation. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
B0CJMTL7ZQ
| unknown
| 3.56
| 151
| unknown
| Oct 12, 2023
|
it was ok
|
The History of Psychedelics was a middle of the road presentation at best. There was not too much real value here, and the nonstop WHITE MAN BAD rheto
The History of Psychedelics was a middle of the road presentation at best. There was not too much real value here, and the nonstop WHITE MAN BAD rhetoric was irritating as fuck. More below. Author Erika Ellen Dyck is a Canadian historian. She is a professor of history and Canada Research Chair in the History of Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan. Erika Dyck : [image] The presenter speaks in a deadpan fashion, and the lectures are delivered with all the enthusiasm and panache of an Encyclopedia entry. This is an audio presentation; split across 6 lectures. Each ~30mins. This is not enough time to properly talk about psychedelics or their history; let alone both topics together. And with such a short run time, you'd think that the author might want to cram in as much valuable info into this presentation as she could. While there was some interesting info provided, the author chose to look at the topic through a critical theory lens, which is oh so fashionable in 2024... There are little bits of partisan jargon liberally shoehorned in everywhere throughout this very short presentation. She crams in unnecessary little literary accouterments that firmly mark her leftist tribal affiliation, and victimology-based worldview. I lost count of how many times she used politically laden terms like: "power structures," "colonialism," "the legacy of colonialism," "patriarchal," "marginalized," and other such assorted leftist newspeak. [FUN GAME IDEA?: Take a drink every time she drops a leftist buzzword. You won't make it through the first lecture...] She also uses nonsensical terms like "non-Western knowledge systems." There is no such thing as a "Western knowledge system." There is just empirical knowledge, and magical thinking. Much of her talk reads like a post-modernist word salad. The author also drops in a curious little line in lecture 6, when she talks about the future of psychedelics: "...we may see them as a means to encourage people to think outside the box. Maybe even to stimulate new revolutionary ideals..." (~Karl Marx, is that you??) Just what kind of "revolutionary ideals" she is referring to is left up to the listener's imagination, but if the other ideologically-laden language is any clue, then you can probably guess. When Western people are talked about, it is almost always with disdain. She spares no opportunity to push the "white guilt" narrative. However, when indigenous people are talked about, it is with reverence and respect. She clearly drank the "Noble Savage" Kool-Aid. It sounds like she places the blame for all that ails Indigenous communities squarely at the feet of the evil colonialists. It must be comforting to have the black-and-white worldview of a 5-year-old. I always imagine professors like this sitting back, patting themselves on the back for what brave and noble social justice warriors they are. The French have a term for people like this. They call them "bien pensants." Christ, these people are exhausting, and I'm getting sick of being bludgeoned over the head with this shit ad nauseam. ****************** If you're in the mood to hear about how terrible your ancestors were and how noble the wise Indian was, then this one is for you. If you'd like an informative look into the history of psychedelic drugs, there are much better books or lectures than these. That someone so ideologically possessed teaches young, impressionable minds scares the shit out of me, TBH. People like this need to be dragged kicking and screaming as far away from any kind of institutional power as can be. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
May 17, 2024
|
Apr 19, 2024
|
Audiobook
| ||||||||||||||||
B003F2QO0U
| 4.03
| 26,355
| Sep 03, 2008
| Mar 24, 2010
|
it was amazing
|
"...According to lore, the maternal instinct is innate. Women are assured it doesn’t matter if they spent their twenties avoiding babies, or if they d
"...According to lore, the maternal instinct is innate. Women are assured it doesn’t matter if they spent their twenties avoiding babies, or if they don’t consider themselves very maternal..." NurtureShock was a super interesting look into the topic. The book is my second from the authors, after their 2013 book Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing, which I also enjoyed. Authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman are married. They’ve written for Newsweek, New York, the Guardian, and numerous other publications. For their reporting, Bronson and Merryman have won nine national awards, including the PEN Center USA Literary Award for Journalism; the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Award for Science Journalism; an “Audie” from the Audio Publishers Association; and two Clarion Awards. Ashley Merryman and Po Bronson : [image] The authors have a great writing style that I found interesting and engaging. This one won't have trouble holding the finicky reader's attention. I also found the formatting to be well done. The book is broken into broad-based and well-delineated chapters, ensuring it has a great flow. The book opens with a lively and interesting intro. The authors talk about a nightclub that had a Cary Grant "lookalike" as a doorman. Surprisingly, he turned out to be actually Cary Grant. This ruse fooled everyone, because no one thought Grant would actually be opening doors at a nightclub. The quote from the start of the review continues below: "...The moment after birth, when the baby’s first handed to his mother, maternal instincts magically kick in, right along with the hormones. As a mother, you will know what to do, and you will continue to know for the next eighteen years. This fountain of knowledge is supposed to come as part of a matched set of ovaries and a desire to wear expensive high heels." The title of the book comes from the contrarian nature of its thesis. That is; the intuitive approach of always "nurturing" children needs a closer examination, because many of its presumptions are not as previously thought. I am admittedly a bit of a sucker for contrarian takes, provided they are well-argued. Fortunately, this one was. It is a science-driven look into many different topics around children, and the field of raising them. I found the case they laid out to be compelling. They expand upon the title in this bit of writing: "'Nurture shock,' as the term is generally used, refers to the panic— common among new parents—that the mythical fountain of knowledge is not magically kicking in at all. And talk about the contents as well as aim of the book in this bit of writing: "The topics covered in this book are wide-ranging, devoted to equal parts brain fiber and moral fiber. They relate to children of every age from tots to teens. It could not be further from a paint-by-numbers approach. As touched on in the quote above, the authors take a shot at the all-encompassing self-esteem movement, citing the famous social psychologist Roy Baumeister's findings: "Baumeister concluded that having high self-esteem didn’t improve grades or career achievement. They also bring some data to the table that indicates that children's racial in-group preferences are inborn, and not taught. Some good writing here. The other topics covered here are: • The Inverse Power of Praise • The Lost Hour; the detrimental effects of less sleep • Why White Parents Don’t Talk About Race • Why Kids Lie • The Search for Intelligent Life in Kindergarten • The Sibling Effect • The Science of Teen Rebellion • Can Self-Control Be Taught? • Plays Well With Others • Why Hannah Talks and Alyssa Doesn’t ******************** I really enjoyed NurtureShock. Remind me to read any books these authors produce. They did a great job putting this one together. It should be on the reading list of every new parent. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 19, 2024
|
Apr 21, 2024
|
Apr 05, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0061846910
| 9780061846915
| B00134XEU0
| 3.84
| 1,592
| Aug 18, 1999
| Oct 13, 2009
|
liked it
|
"We can learn as much by looking in the crib and the nursery as by looking in the petri dish or the telescope. In some ways we learn more—we learn wha
"We can learn as much by looking in the crib and the nursery as by looking in the petri dish or the telescope. In some ways we learn more—we learn what it means to be human..." The Scientist In The Crib was a somewhat interesting look into the development and lives of babies as well as young children. Author Alison Gopnik is an American professor of psychology and affiliate professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. Alison Gopnik: [image] The book opens with a decent preface. The author talks about how it was previously long thought that babies were little more than screaming automatons; carrying out fixed action patterns. This line of thinking persevered in medical orthodoxy for quite a while. Fortunately, we now know that this is not the case. As anyone who's had kids can tell you; young children, and even babies see the world in complex ways. They develop preferences, proclivities, and even their own little personality traits from quite a young age. In this book, Gopnik examines what is known scientifically about this transformative period. She drops this quote speaking to the scope and aim of the book: "In this book we tell the story of the new science of children’s minds. This story should be important to everyone who is interested in the mind and the brain. It’s a central part of the new discipline called cognitive science. Cognitive science has united psychology, philosophy, linguistics, computer science, and neuroscience. New scientific insights often come from unexpected and even humble places, and some of the most important insights in cognitive science have come from the crib and the nursery. Understanding children has led us to understand ourselves in a new way." Although I was excited to start this one after hearing it referenced numerous times in other books I've read, the writing just did not meet my expectations. While there is quite a lot of interesting material covered, the presentation of it was a bit lackluster... I felt that the book lacked cohesion and continuity. There is quite a lot of repetition and overlap in here. Also, to the best of my knowledge, nothing in the book is really revolutionary or controversial. Although it is 15 years old, and maybe some of the talk about brain development was new back then. Some of what is talked about here includes: • Theory of mind • Language. Japanese vs English. The "L's" and "R's" • The "cuteness" of babies • Brain development; neural pruning ******************** The Scientist In The Crib was still an interesting examination of how a young brain develops. I would recommend it. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
Apr 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1429959444
| 9781429959445
| 1429959444
| 3.79
| 1,452
| 2003
| Aug 04, 2009
|
liked it
|
"A ONE-MONTH-OLD STARES at her mother’s face with fixed, brow-wrinkling concentration, and suddenly produces a beatific smile. Surely she must see her
"A ONE-MONTH-OLD STARES at her mother’s face with fixed, brow-wrinkling concentration, and suddenly produces a beatific smile. Surely she must see her mother and feel love, but what are seeing and feeling like for her?" The Philosophical Baby was an interesting look into the development and lives of babies as well as young children. Unfortunately, I felt that the the overall presentation of the book was a bit flat. More below. The book is my second from the author, after her 1999 book The Scientist in the Crib: What Early Learning Tells Us About the Mind. Author Alison Gopnik is an American professor of psychology and affiliate professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. Alison Gopnik: [image] As anyone who's had kids can tell you; young children and babies see the world in complex ways. They develop preferences, proclivities, and even their own little personality traits from quite a young age. In this book, Gopnik examines what is known scientifically about this transformative period. The book opens with a decent introduction that was fairly interesting and engaging. Unfortunately, I did not find the writing style in the rest of the book to be on par with the intro. Although there is a quite a lot of interesting info here, the writing takes too many long-winded tangents for my tastes. I am admittedly very picky about how readable my books are, and this one fell a bit short for me... The quote from the start of this review continues below: "...What is it like to be a baby? A two-year-old offers a hungry-looking stranger a half-chewed lollipop. Could a child this young already feel empathy and be altruistic? A three-year-old announces that she will come to dinner only if a place is laid for the Babies, the tiny purple-haired twins who live in her pocket and eat flowers for breakfast. How could she believe so profoundly in something that is just a figment of her own imagination? And how could she dream up such remarkable creatures? A five-year-old discovers, with the help of a goldfish, that death is irreversible. How could a child who can’t yet read or add uncover deep, hard truths about mortality? The one month- old turns into the two-year-old and then the three-year-old and the five-year-old and eventually, miraculously, turns into a mother with children of her own. How could all these utterly different creatures be the same person? All of us once were children and most of us will become parents— we have all asked these sorts of questions." In this short quote, she mentions how much of the previous orthodoxy around childhood cognition is being reexamined: "New scientific research and philosophical thinking have both illuminated and deepened the mystery. In the last thirty years, there’s been a revolution in our scientific understanding of babies and young children. We used to think that babies and young children were irrational, egocentric, and amoral. Their thinking and experience were concrete, immediate, and limited. In fact, psychologists and neuroscientists have discovered that babies not only learn more, but imagine more, care more, and experience more than we would ever have thought possible. In some ways, young children are actually smarter, more imaginative, more caring, and even more conscious than adults are..." Some more of what Gopnik covers here includes: • Counterfactuals • Imaginary companions • Escaping Plato’s Cave: HOW CHILDREN, SCIENTISTS, AND COMPUTERS DISCOVER THE TRUTH • What Is It Like to Be a Baby? • Who Am I? MEMORY, SELF, AND THE BABBLING STREAM • Heraclitus’ River and the Romanian Orphans: HOW DOES OUR EARLY LIFE SHAPE OUR LATER LIFE? • Learning to Love: ATTACHMENT AND IDENTITY • Love and Law: THE ORIGINS OF MORALITY • Mirror neurons • Babies and the Meaning of Life ******************** The Philosophical Baby was an interesting book, but I felt the writing was a bit slow for my finicky tastes. Your mileage may vary, so I would still recommend it. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 24, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1668006529
| 9781668006528
| 1668006529
| 4.10
| 2,135
| Jan 23, 2024
| Jan 23, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
"If you could rewind your life to the very beginning and then press play, would everything turn out the same?" It's not often (for me anyhow) that I re "If you could rewind your life to the very beginning and then press play, would everything turn out the same?" It's not often (for me anyhow) that I read a book that really captures my attention, and has me thinking about it for a while after putting it down. Without wanting to sound braggadocious, I do read a fair bit, and sometimes the tedium and lackluster nature of certain books gets under my skin. This leaves me with book burnout from time to time, where I just don't feel like reading at all. Rarely do I have the pleasure of reading a book that can really get my gears turning, and present me with concepts that I haven't extensively explored on my own, or read about elsewhere. Fluke is that book. It was an incredibly fascinating read. I wasn't sure what to expect from the book going in, as I had not heard of the author before. I enjoy reading about science and social psychology, so I picked this one up when I saw it. I am happy to report that the book far exceeded any expectations I had of it going in. There's some super-interesting writing here. More below. Author Brian Paul Klaas is an American political scientist and contributing writer at The Atlantic. He is an associate professor in global politics at University College London. Brian Klaas: [image] The author writes with a lively and engaging style that shouldn't have trouble holding even the finicky reader's attention. The audiobook version I have is also read by the author, which is a nice touch I always appreciate. The book's formatting was also well done, and it has great flow. There are many, many passages of interesting and quotable writing in these pages. I am including some of the more choice quotes here, both for my own future reference, and for anyone else interested. Klass gets the writing off on a good foot, with a very well-written intro. He talks about the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The city of Kyoto was previously chosen, but Secretary of War H.L Stimson liked Kyoto, having visited there years earlier. That random vacation saved the people of Kyoto, while dooming the ones living in Hiroshima. He writes: "...Clouds spared one city, while one couple’s vacation decades earlier saved another. The story of Kyoto and Kokura poses an immediate challenge to our convenient, simplified assumptions of cause and effect following a rational, ordered progression. We like to imagine that we can understand, predict, and control the world. We want a rational explanation to make sense of the chaos of life. The world isn’t supposed to be a place where hundreds of thousands of people live or die from decades-old nostalgia for one couple’s pleasant vacation, or because clouds flitted across the sky at just the right moment." The meat and potatoes of the book is ultimately about how chaos theory applies to all of our lives. Don't worry, the author never gets too technical or esoteric. Anyone with even a small degree of scientific literacy should be able to follow the plot here. Points added, because all too often, science books fail miserably at doing just that... I think we have all pondered at some point, about certain random, chance happenstances that have changed our lives (and the lives of those close to us) forever afterward. The author provides many super interesting examples of this throughout. A foiled revolutionary coup from failing to grasp a pant leg. The gift of a tie saving someone from dying on 9/11. The assassination of an Archduke starting a World War. Why did everything turn out the way it did? It's a question that has forever intrigued, well; just about everyone; from religious scholars, to scientists, to philosophers, to you and I. Upon close examination or reflection, many of the world's pivotal turning points occurred due to the presence of some tiny essential element that has drastically weighed down the scale of causality. The book covers many examples from history, and Klass provides a shocking example from his own family history. The scope of the writing here is quite broad, and I found the subject matter he presents here to be incredibly fascinating. The author drops this excellent quote, which delves a bit more into the thesis of the book: "...Whenever we revisit the dog-eared pages within our personal histories, we’ve all experienced Kokura’s luck (though, hopefully, on a less consequential scale). Klass breaks down the traditional line of thinking around causality into two distinct camps: "Convergence is the “everything happens for a reason” school of evolutionary biology. Contingency is the “stuff happens” theory." He says that the common theory of causality, that is; the convergence theory, is not correct: "I am a (disillusioned) social scientist. Disillusioned because I’ve long had a nagging feeling that the world doesn’t work the way that we pretend it does. The more I grappled with the complexity of reality, the more I suspected that we have all been living a comforting lie, from the stories we tell about ourselves to the myths we use to explain history and social change. I began to wonder whether the history of humanity is just an endless, but futile, struggle to impose order, certainty, and rationality onto a world defined by disorder, chance, and chaos. Klass outlines the aim of the book here: We will tackle six big questions: He drops this quote, asking who the most influential person of the 21st century was: "Who has been the most influential person of the twenty-firstbcentury so far? Some might say Xi Jinping, or Vladimir Putin, or Donald Trump. I disagree. My nomination would be an unnamed person. The COVID- 19 pandemic likely started with a single person, in a single event, in Wuhan, China.VIII The lives of literally billions of people were drastically changed, for years, by one virus infecting one individual. Never in human history have the daily lives of so many people been so drastically affected, for so long, by one small, contingent event. Welcome to the swarm..." In this quote, he talks about misconceptions around the super-successful and wealthy: (view spoiler)[ "...Consider the widespread—but mistaken—belief that the global superrich must have earned their wealth due to their genius. But look a little closer, and that myth soon crumbles. Most human traits, including intelligence, skills, and hard work, are normally distributed, following a Gaussian, or bell-shaped, curve, a bit like an inverted U. Wealth, by contrast, isn’t normally distributed. It follows a power law or a Pareto distribution, with a tiny group of people controlling huge swaths of global wealth. While you’ll never find an adult who is five times shorter or five times taller than you, today’s richest person is more than a million times richer than the average American. So, someone who is marginally smarter than you could become a million times richer, rather than marginally richer. This is the world of what is sometimes called fat tails, which Nassim Nicholas Taleb brings to life in The Black Swan. But what if such extreme wealth is due not to talent, but to random factors that we’d usually call luck? In one recent study, physicists teamed up with an economist and used computer modeling to develop a fake society with a realistic distribution of talent among competing individuals. In their fake world, talent mattered, but so did luck. Then, when they ran the simulation over and over, they found that the richest person was never the most talented. Instead, it was almost always someone close to average. Why was that? In a world of 8 billion people, most lie in the middle level of talent, the largest area of the Bell curve. Now, think of luck like a lightning bolt: it strikes haphazardly. Due to their sheer numbers, luck is overwhelmingly likely to strike someone from the vast billions of middle-level talent, not the tiny sliver of übertalented geniuses. As the researchers sum it up, “Our results highlight the risks of the paradigm that we call ‘naive meritocracy’… because it underestimates the role of randomness among the determinants of success.” Some billionaires may be talented. All have been lucky. And luck is, by definition, the product of chance. Taleb, Duncan Watts, and Robert Frank have each shown how we tend to infer reasons backward when success is produced, with what they call the “narrative fallacy” or, more commonly, “hindsight bias.” The notion that billionaires must be talented is one such fallacy. Yet, if luck plays such an important role in success, that should affect how we think about fortune and misfortune. If you believe you live in a meritocratic world, in which success is doled out to the most talented individuals rather than partly by accident or chance, then it makes sense to claim full credit for each success and blame yourself for every defeat. But if you accept that apparent randomness and accidents drive significant swaths of change in our lives—and they do—then that will change your outlook on life. When you lose at roulette, you don’t kick yourself for being a useless failure. Instead, you accept the arbitrary outcome and move on. Recognizing that often meaningless, accidental outcomes emerge from an intertwined, complex world is empowering and liberating. We should all take a bit less credit for our triumphs and a bit less blame for our failures." (hide spoiler)] Some more of what is covered here includes: • Laplace’s demon • Evolution; adaptive and maladaptive change • Schemas; heuristics • Swarms; locusts • Complicated vs. Complex systems • Emergence • Cascades • The brain as a prediction machine; probability theory • Quantum theory; entanglement • Mankind's inborn narrative shaping of information; narrative bias. • Path dependency • The Great Man theory • Darwin; evolution. • How timing, down to the split second, produces world-changing impacts • "The Garden of Forking Paths" • Why rocket science is easier than understanding human society • Are our lives scripted from the start, or do we have the freedom to choose our futures? • Free Will. "You can decide to drink water, but do you choose to want to drink water in the first place? Do you sit down, reflect, and then say, “I choose to feel thirsty!”? Your body decides for you. When you then decide to drink water, you’re responding to your body, and the complex interactions within it. But what’s true of thirst is true of everything else." • The upside of uncertainty in our chaotic, intertwined world ******************** Fluke was a super thought-provoking read. I read a decent number of books, and I have not read one that covers all the material that the author presents here. He did a great job with this book. I liked it so much, and it was so interesting, that I will revisit it soon for a reread. I would highly recommend it. 5 stars, and a spot on my favorites shelf. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 29, 2024
|
Jan 30, 2024
|
Jan 29, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0861544528
| 9780861544523
| B0C1CV56GT
| 3.75
| 535
| Oct 24, 2023
| Nov 02, 2023
|
liked it
|
"A deadly secret lurks within our refrigerators, pantries, medicine cabinets, and gardens. Scratch beneath the surface of a coffee bean, a red pepper
"A deadly secret lurks within our refrigerators, pantries, medicine cabinets, and gardens. Scratch beneath the surface of a coffee bean, a red pepper flake, a poppy capsule, a Penicillium mold, a foxglove leaf, a magic mushroom, a marijuana bud, a nutmeg seed, or a brewer’s yeast cell, and we find a bevy of poisons..." Most Delicious Poison ended up being a mixed bag for me. While it did contain a ton of interesting info, I had some gripes. I'll cover both "the good" and "the bad" below. Author Noah Whiteman is Professor of Genetics, Genomics, Evolution and Development and Director of the Essig Museum of Entomology at UC-Berkeley. He also has affiliations with the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Center for Computational Biology, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, and University and Jepson Herbaria. His laboratory focuses on understanding how and why plants, microbes, and even some animals use toxins in offense and defense, and how some organisms overcome and even steal those toxins, from the monarch butterfly, to us Noah Whiteman: [image] The book opens with an intro that I found to be a bit slow. I also found quite a lot of the writing here to be on the dry side, and found my attention wandering a few times here. Now, fault me if you will for my finicky attention, but I like my books lively, and my reviews are always heavily weighted towards this criteria. The audio version of the book I have was also read by the author. Normally, I like when authors narrate their own books. Unfortunately, for some reason, this author's voice managed to thoroughly irritate me; grinding on my nerves as the book went on. There was just something about the author that I did not like, and he did not resonate with me. (Sorry, but it is what it is...) He continues the quote from the start of this review below: "...The chemicals in these products of nature are not a sideshow—they are the main event, and we’ve unwittingly stolen them from a war raging all around us. We use these toxic chemicals to greet our days (caffeine), titillate our tongues (capsaicin), recover from our surgeries (morphine), cure our infections (penicillin), mend our hearts (digoxin), bend our minds (psilocybin), calm our nerves (cannabinol), spice up our food and drink (myristicin), and enhance our social lives (ethanol)." In this quote, the aim of the book is outlined: "This book explores the fascinating and sometimes surprising ways that toxins from nature arose, have been used by us humans and other animals, and have consequently changed the world. We will follow several interrelated threads, or approaches, as we examine how these chemicals have influenced evolution and how they have penetrated each human life, for better and for worse." On the positive side, there was quite a lot of ground covered in here. I read a fair bit, and I particularly enjoy learning about things that I have not read elsewhere. Quite a lot of the information presented here was stuff that I have not come across in the other science books I've read. For example, he's got some really interesting writing about eating spices as adults but not as children. There was also an interesting bit of information on sulforaphane and Parkinson's disease. As someone who sprouts broccoli seeds and eats them for their sulforaphane content, and someone with a close family member who has PD, I found this writing elucidating. Unfortunately, however, as these things tend to do, the interesting subject matter covered here was overshadowed by the author's personal commentary. He chose to frame this book around his father's alcoholism, and eventual death. The results were... well; mixed. Although there was probably a great deal left out of the book, it is clear (to me anyhow) from the writing here that the author has some serious daddy issues. If I were a gambling man, I would also bet that the author has some other pretty sizeable issues. There are little tidbits dropped throughout the book that hint at some pretty serious dysfunctionality. The author says he called his dad on Thanksgiving one year, and put the call on a 10 minute timer; among other strange anecdotes. When he found out his father died, he said it was "a relief." In the next sentence, it is implied that a good deal of this relief comes from the fact that his dad (gasp) owned guns. He says: "...While his passing was tragic, it was also a relief. My father was obsessed with guns." ~Yikes. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not passing judgment on his family life, as I know we all have our family issues, but I'm not sure how germane to the broader thesis of the book the inclusion of all this stuff was. Pearl-clutching over someone owning firearms, being set off by someone wearing a MAGA hat, and other irrelevant bits of personal commentary were definitely superfluous to the book; in general. It also seems to me that a more well-adjusted adult author of a science book could portray a dysfunctional parental relationship in a more appropriate manner, that didn't have you come across to the reader as deeply troubled from it... The irrelevant personal commentary also extended to other subjects here that have nothing at all to do with the book. He's got a bunch of assorted leftist nonsense in here that betrays his partisan hand, and has him signaling his groupthink adherence to THE MESSAGE™. He's got many blurbs of writing feeling guilty about colonization; American, Spanish, and other assorted European varieties. I also literally laughed out loud when he says "pregnant women" in the audio, but the book says "pregnant people." Pregnant "people??" The term "Latinx" is also dropped in here. Good Lord, this is all so tiresome... Speaking of drugs and poison: Ideology is a hell of a drug... ******************** Fortunately, there was still a lot of interesting ground covered here, if you can get past the criticisms above. For this reason, I'll still give the book a decent rating. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 05, 2024
|
Feb 06, 2024
|
Jan 26, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0593129733
| 9780593129739
| B0C2PF3RTV
| 3.93
| 1,139
| Jan 16, 2024
| Jan 16, 2024
|
liked it
|
"The Moon has shaped our rulers, and their conquests, since civilization’s earliest days, but its power over us is far more ancient than even our conf
"The Moon has shaped our rulers, and their conquests, since civilization’s earliest days, but its power over us is far more ancient than even our conflicts..." Our Moon was an informative read, but I felt that the writing dragged here at times... I was looking for something a bit different from the books I typically read, and put this one on my list when I came across it. Author Rebecca Boyle is an award-winning science writer. She writes for The Atlantic, the New York Times, New Scientist, Popular Science, Smithsonian Air & Space, and many other publications. Rebecca Boyle: [image] Boyle opens the book with a very well-written intro, that talks about her grandfather's participation in the battle of Tarawa. I had high hopes for the writing that was to follow. Unfortunately, I found that it got more esoteric and tedious as the book went on... More below. She drops the quote at the start of this review in the intro, and it continues below: "...The Moon’s influence goes back to the sulfurous origins of this planet and everything that crawls, flaps, swims, or strains skyward on its surface. The Moon guides all of us from its vaulted position above us. But it’s not apart from us, not least because it is actually a part of Earth. It was sheared from Earth when the planet was still freshly baked. And its elliptical orbit does not technically circle Earth, at least not in the way you might think. Instead, Earth and the Moon orbit each other, pivoting around a combined center of gravity that guides them both and that shapes their shared history. In this quote, she lays out the aim of the book: "This book is the story of our journey with the Moon in three parts: how the Moon was made, how the Moon made us, and how we made the Moon in our image. This is not solely an astronomy book, and it is not an Apollo book, though astronomy and the Apollo missions are both inseparable from humanity’s journey with the Moon. This is a book about time, life on Earth, human civilization, our place in the universe, and how the Moon has made all of it possible. I hope this book changes your understanding of all these things. And I hope it changes the way you see the Moon, this partner world that has always been with you, and which I hope you notice anew the next time you go outside at night." Unfortunately, as touched on above, I did not find the writing in the second ~half of the book to be as engaging and interesting as the writing in the first half. Now, fault me if you want for being too picky, but I am very particular about how lively and engaging the books I read are. Sadly, I found my finicky attention wandering numerous times here, particularly after the ~ halfway point, when she spends quite a lot of time talking about ancient Sumerian Moon worshippers in ~600BCE. Also, for reasons unknown, the author somehow manages to shoehorn in various assorted bits of irrelevant leftist politicking into these pages. She has a decently sized chunk of writing about how the Space Program could have fed hungry children, with some snarkish commentary about the American efforts towards besting the Communist sphere in the Space Race. Although she did mostly manage (fortunately) to keep a fairly tight leash on it for most of the book, she lets out this line, which I found both cringey and hilarious: "...The Moon landing occurred during, and because of, the Cold War. So in one sense, it is impressive that the language included “for all mankind” in that (unfortunately gendered) last line." ~"Mankind." You know, as in the colloquial term used to describe all of humanity? A word that's been common parlance in the English language since the 13th century. But, ya, let's complain about putting that on a plaque. Christ, these people are exhausting. Should the plaque have said "peoplekind" instead?? Ridiculous nonsense... You know, it's becoming more and more difficult to pick up a nonfiction book these days without reading the unnecessary and (most often) unwelcomed author's political commentary. Commentary that is, more often than not; completely juvenile and ridiculous. It would be nice to pick up a book about the Moon, and have the author just tell the fucking story, without adding her own shit-tier, low-resolution partisan politicking... That an author can't write a book about the Moon without adding in derogatory tidbits of writing about America, men, or other assorted SJW nonsense should serve as a barometer of her ideological possession. I really, really dislike it when authors cram their own partisan talking points into books where they have no business being. Ok, end rant. ******************** If you are looking for a one-stop shop for all things "Moon," then this is your book. The scope of the writing here is incredibly broad. Unfortunately, quite a lot of the wiring trended towards minutia, and I found my attention wandering numerous times here... I think that a large chunk of the book should have been taken out for the sake of brevity and clarity. 3 stars, rounded down to 2.5 due to the inclusion of the author's mindless leftist commentary. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 24, 2024
|
Jan 28, 2024
|
Jan 23, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1771649356
| 9781771649353
| 1771649356
| 3.83
| 94
| unknown
| Apr 25, 2023
|
really liked it
|
"It began with a yellow-orange spot. I was standing opposite the penguin colony, on a rocky outcrop jutting up from the snow a few hundred yards above
"It began with a yellow-orange spot. I was standing opposite the penguin colony, on a rocky outcrop jutting up from the snow a few hundred yards above the shore. I looked a bit like a penguin myself..." Secret Life of the City was a nice change of pace from many of the books I typically read. I was in the mood for an easy-going, light-hearted book, and this one fit that bill nicely. Author Hanna Bjørgaas is a biologist who has worked as a guide in the Arctic and Antarctic, led field courses in Norway, and worked with architects and artists to help communicate the joy of nature to others. She has written articles on popular science and contributed to conferences on ecology and farming. Hanna Bjørgaas: [image] As mentioned above, the author worked as a tour guide in Antarctica. She drops the quote above about an orange lichen that thrives there. She's got an easy-going writing style that was pretty relaxo, IMHO. The book also didn't drag, and I felt that it had a decent flow. After the intro, she talks about the intelligence of crows early on, which then segues into the first chapter about corvid intelligence. She mentions some really fascinating research about crow's ability to recognize faces, and even pass on culturally those that posed a danger to them. Some great writing here. Some more of the urban life she talks about in the book includes: • Ants and aphids • Seagulls • The Linden tree • Composting; soil organisms • Fungal hyphae; mushrooms • Bats • Lichen • Birds; sparrows ******************** I wasn't sure what to expect from Secret Life of the City. I am happy to report that I enjoyed this book. It was very well-researched, put together, and presented. It would make a great lazy Sunday afternoon read. I would recommend it to anyone reading this review. 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
Dec 09, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1250219116
| 9781250219114
| 1250219116
| 3.98
| 204
| Jul 28, 2020
| Jul 28, 2020
|
it was ok
|
"...Yet, as a current strain of perceptual research is showing, the way we think, feel, and exist is inexorably shaped by our physical being. The body
"...Yet, as a current strain of perceptual research is showing, the way we think, feel, and exist is inexorably shaped by our physical being. The body and brain are indivisibly coupled, and this book is a celebration of—and investigation into—that fact. The better we can understand what our bodies are—what they can do, what they need, what they must avoid—the better we can understand ourselves and our lives. To do this, we need to put the brain back in the body." Perception was an OK read that had its moments. However, I had a few pretty sizeable issues with it. More below... I typically enjoy books about mindsets, and the mind/body connection, so I put this one on my list when I came across it. This review will be a long one, so get comfortable. Or, feel free to skip to the bottom for a tl;dr summary. Author Dennis Proffitt has helped develop the field of embodied cognition in his near 40-year tenure at UVA. He is a highly sought speaker, and his research has been widely covered in the press. Dennis Proffitt: [image] The book opens with a somewhat decent intro. It's written with a fairly decent style, although it did border on slow and long-winded at times. The author mentions the concept of the "Umvelt" in the books intro. Basically, this is the subjective manner in which all creatures experience reality. Ed Yong's book An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us centered around the same concept. [As an aside: that book would be a far better way to spend your time and money than this one.] Proffitt drops this quote about the Umvelt: "What about the human Umwelt? What experiential worlds do we live in as a species, and how do these worlds differ across individuals? The ecological nature of this question has been mostly overlooked in contemporary psychology, in part because we naively assume that we all know what it’s like to be human. But unfortunately we are poor judges of our own experience, and it’s common sense to believe that we experience the world as it objectively is. This is what social scientists and philosophers call naive realism: taking what we see, smell, hear, and feel at face value." The book is a (mostly) science-driven look into human perception. While there was some interesting information here, I was just not too big of a fan of the overall presentation. I found my attention wandering a few times (sorry). Unfortunately, there was also the addition of a baffling torrent of leftist politicking here; for some reason. Maybe a quick physiognomy check of the author would have provided a harbinger of what was to come... There are numerous assorted bits of partisan writing and jargon crammed in throughout the book, somehow. I really can't stand when authors do this kind of thing, and my ratings always reflect as much. Although I am attuned towards, have read many books, and follow many pundits involved in the ongoing culture war, it's fucking exhausting; for the most part. So, one of the reasons I like to read so much is to get away from it all. Sadly, this is becoming more and more difficult to do, as the Woke Mind Virus has hit its tipping point... There is a lot of talk here about supposed racial "bias" from (surprise) white people, against black people. The authors are really trying to ram the white guilt down the reader's throat here for some reason, as they put it on pretty heavily at times. This is especially ironic, as they are both white themselves LMAO. The inclusion of this kind of crap is nonsensical; for a few reasons. 1) All ethnic groups have an in-group, out-group bias and preference. This is Social Psychology 101. 2) These "implicit bias" tests are fraught with fundamental problems and lack scientific rigour. Here is an article that examines further. And here's another one, just to start. Of course, these claims of racism and "implicit bias" are presented here matter-of-factly, without scrutinizing them at all. The criticisms here are also only leveled at white people, and conveniently ignores that racial tensions have existed between all ethnic groups, for longer than recorded history. God, how tiresome... Chapter 8 of the book also includes a ridiculous take on the protest held in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017. The author calls the "Unite the Right" protestors all "white supremacists," and pearl-clutches over the ever-elusive threat of the "far right." In a time where actual leftist partisans now dominate the cultural landscape by controlling most of the news media, magazines, books, virtually all social media, academia, and all of Hollywood; the author is crying about the threat of the "far right." Of course, if you are a borderline (or actual) Marxist, everyone to your right seems "far right." Unsurprisingly, there is no mention of the widespread riots and destruction that spread throughout many large American cities in 2020, driven by far-left violent protestors and looters. Countless buildings and cars were burned, and ~30 people were killed. But, ya, they were "mostly peaceful" , tho... He then goes on in the very next breath to tell the reader how being tribally affiliated and partisan can cloud your judgment and make you lose your objective perception, all while never having the sense to reign in his own partisan bias and rantings. Jesus, how ironic... The author also drops in the ridiculous claim that race has nothing to do with biology, and is strictly a social construct. The average 5-year-old could accurately place a random large group of whites, blacks and Asians into their respective categories with almost 100% accuracy, but this somehow has no biological basis? If there is phenotypic clustering, then there is genotypic clustering. How else would this work?? The authors claim that because there are no hard genetic borders between the races, then the whole paradigm is invalid. Brilliant "logic" here. On a broad color spectrum gradient, it is impossible to tell exactly where the color yellow turns into the color red. Therefore, we can conclude that there is no valid classification for either the colour of yellow or red. Race is absolutely a valid taxonomic classification, below the level of subspecies. If you don't like the term "race", then substitute it with "population", "clustering", "ethnicity", "group", or other PC-friendly term. The process that leads to racial differences is one of the fundamental mechanisms of biology. Populations split from their original location and become separated. In each new environment with different selection pressures, random mutations are either positively or negatively selected for in the genome. Include the passing of many generations, over a long period of time, and you get allopatric speciation. If the populations remain isolated for long enough, full speciation occurs, where the two phenotypes will no longer be able to produce viable offspring. The way this relates to human history is complicated, of course, given overlapping geographic areas, conquest, and interbreeding, but genotypic clusterings, or "race" is a scientific reality. That people share common phenotypic traits within groups is patently obvious to any child. But it takes some serious mental gymnastics to discount these differences as an intelligent adult. Those gymnastics are presented here. It brings to mind one of my favorite quotes, that: "Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them"... He also makes some dubious claims about loneliness and excessive mortality. He cites research that claims people with a smaller social network have higher mortalities than those with larger social networks. Again; this is a low-resolution view, and as we all know; correlation does not equal causation. This data makes no account for those people that are, by nature - introverts, or people that don't want to be a part of large social groups, and feel more content being alone, or around only select people. I recently read another book that talked specifically about this (sorry I can't remember which one), and the author's more nuanced take was that this correlation is largely due to the subjective experience of the person. That is, it is the feeling of loneliness and/or isolation that causes the high mortality, not the absolute number of friends and acquaintances. Some people think they have 20+ "friends," (who are more than likely actually just acquaintances). While others have a very small number of very close friends, and little to no acquaintances. Both groups of people can be equally happy with this, depending on how introverted or extroverted they are, and their feelings about their situation... That the author of a book centering around the thesis that everyone experiences the world differently and subjectively failed to consider the above is pretty bad, and also sadly ironic (again)... British anthropologist and evolutionary psychologist Robin I.M. Dunbar has written about this, and said that the average person sits inside a network of concentric circles; with those closest to them in the center, and then spreading out. He identifies people as having no more than 5 people who are really close to them, and then expanding out. (See diagram below) [image] ******************** Perception was an interesting book; at times. At other times, it was a bit dry. Other times, it was full of the mindless rantings of someone who is very obviously ideologically possessed. This is a subjective assessment, of course, and your mileage may vary... I'm deducting a few points here for the inclusion of so much unnecessary politicking and other assorted leftist nonsense in a book where it had no business being. I was close to putting this one down a few times. Remind me to take a hard pass from anything else this author produces... 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 04, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 04, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0062092081
| 9780062092083
| B004MMEIT6
| 4.02
| 1,983
| May 24, 2011
| May 24, 2011
|
really liked it
|
"When the body is subjected to stresses and overloads of varying intensities, it will gradually adapt over time to overcome whatever demands are place
"When the body is subjected to stresses and overloads of varying intensities, it will gradually adapt over time to overcome whatever demands are placed on it..." Which Comes First, Cardio or Weights? was a decent cursory look into the modern (well, circa 2011 anyhow) science behind the fields of fitness and exercise. I enjoyed the book, but the title is a bit misleading. While that question is briefly covered, so are about 100+ other exercise-related topics. Author Alex Hutchinson is a National Magazine Award-winning journalist whose work appears in Outside, The Globe and Mail, The New York Times, The New Yorker, and other publications. This is my second book from the author, after his 2018 book Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance, which I also enjoyed. Alex Hutchinson: [image] The book is presented in a rather straightforward, matter-of-fact, no-frills presentation. Hutchinson writes with a decent style that shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. The formatting of the book is a little unorthodox. While it is broken into chapters, each chapter is broken into many many different segments, with relevant headers at the top. The book's title: "Which Comes First, Cardio or Weights?" is just one of countless dozens of these topics covered. The quote from the start of this review continues: "...That’s what every form of exercise boils down to. The stress could be lifting weights or pedaling a bicycle, and the adaptation is bigger muscle fibers, a stronger heart, and hundreds of other microscopic changes. The key is balancing the size of the stress: too small (lifting a half-pound weight, say), and your body won’t see any need to adapt; too large, and it won’t have a chance to adapt due to injury or exhaustion. Much of the research described in this book aims to help you find this delicate balance." Hutchinson also drops this quote early on, which speaks to the scope of the book: "...So let me begin with a full disclosure: this book does not contain any secret workouts or magic pills that will produce instant fitness. I have been vigorously exercising since I was in my mid 20s; both cardio and strength training. I have no plans of stopping, ever. If you meet me at a dinner party, I'll probably irritate the shit out of you by preaching this evangel. But - it's for good reason. The author drops this short quote, about the importance of getting moving, even just a little: "From a public health perspective, the top priority is getting those inactive people to start moving, even a little bit. Going from zero to slightly active offers the biggest possible health boost, according to a recent National Institutes of Health study that followed 250,000 men and women between the ages of 50 and 71. Those who were just slightly active but didn’t manage to meet the exercise guidelines were 30 percent less likely to die than those who were totally inactive. Stepping it up to moderate exercise reduced risk by only eight more percent, and adding in some vigorous exercise subtracted an additional 12 percent. When you combine that data, you find that getting half an hour of moderate to vigorous exercise five times a week cuts your risk of dying from all causes in half." I think one of the main problems associated with trying to get people to become active has to do with a common heuristic they have almost universally adopted. That is; exercising is just for people who are overweight. If you are thin, you don't need to exercise. This is a terrible (as well as wrong) assumption. In this short quote, the author dispels that myth: "Obese people who are physically fit are half as likely to die as thin, sedentary people. Aerobic fitness may be a better measure of health than body-mass index." Indeed, newer research done by various exercise scientists has placed your VO2 Max as one of the greatest predictors of both general health, and your risk of all-cause mortality. Hand grip strength is also cited similarily. ******************** I enjoyed this book and would recommend it. Unfortunately, almost all of what is covered here won't be new to anyone with even a fair degree of fitness literacy. However, if you don't know much about the topic, this could make a great primer. 4 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 21, 2023
|
Nov 22, 2023
|
Nov 15, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0241543975
| 9780241543979
| 0241543975
| 4.19
| 204
| unknown
| Jun 15, 2023
|
liked it
|
"Twenty-first-century living is causing our airways to close, our skin to flake, our joints to swell, our guts to bleed, our arteries to clot and our
"Twenty-first-century living is causing our airways to close, our skin to flake, our joints to swell, our guts to bleed, our arteries to clot and our brains to seize up. The global pandemic of non-infectious diseases is, arguably, a greater threat to humanity than that caused by any communicable disease. The healthcare systems set up to treat these diseases are increasingly unsustainable. If we are to meaningfully understand how and why we’ve reached this crisis – and how to solve it – we urgently need to reappraise our relationship with our microbes..." Dark Matter was an overall decent and interesting read, but I had some gripes. More below. I'll cover the "good" before getting to the "bad." The scientific understanding of our microbiomes is still in its infancy. It has been said that the bacteria that make up our microbiota outnumber our own cells by roughly a 10:1 ratio. These bacteria have wide-ranging and deep impacts on virtually every aspect of our lives. They can make us depressed, make us crave certain foods, and can cause or prevent many chronic diseases and other health conditions. Author James Kinross is a senior lecturer in colorectal surgery and consultant surgeon at Imperial College London and a visiting professor at the Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland. He leads a research team defining how the microbiome causes cancer and other chronic diseases of the gut. Dark Matter is his first book. James Kinross: [image] Kinross writes with a lively and engaging style here, and this book won't have trouble holding the attention of even the most finicky reader. It also contains a ton of incredibly interesting content and information; both from his professional career, and the newer scientific research in this emerging field. The audiobook version I have was also read by the author; which is a nice touch that I always appreciate. The intro mentions the human appendix; long thought by medical orthodoxy to be a superfluous organ in need of removal. The author drops the quote at the start of this review, and continues on: "...While some of those microbes might be harming or even killing us, what about the rest? Could they be helping us heal and grow, or even think and feel? Could our microbes be in conversation with our immune system – and explain why diseases related to it are increasingly common? Or why we get cancer, what the appendix does, or even why some drugs work and others don’t? For the best part of two decades I have sampled the microbiomes of generous patients undergoing surgery in theatre number three, in my quest to find answers to these questions. I’ve also followed the work of colleagues across the world and we’ve shared our findings and ideas. The answers have been surprising, beyond what we could have imagined. Now, I am a huge proponent of human progress, civilization, and modernity; however, all this progress has not come without its costs. In the West, our collective health is far from optimal. Kinross says this: "The microscopic life forms that preside over our health and wellness are increasingly frustrated with the mistreatment inflicted upon them by hyperglobalization – and they have a formidable molecular arsenal with which they are demonstrating their displeasure. The result is that although we are living longer than ever before in history, we are not living happier. Ok, so now on to the "bad." Sadly, in a trend that seems to be increasing over time, a book about literal bacteria has somehow managed to cram in a ton of partisan preaching, jargon and politicking. There are many irrelevant rants about climate change and other assorted leftist rhetoric liberally peppering this book. I don't know WTF climate change has to do with our microbiome, or even why the author seems to think that climate "change" is the biggest threat facing humanity today. He says as much many times here, for some reason. I mean, in developing countries, climate change does not even make the list of the top 100 concerns of its citizenry. They are more preoccupied with things like how to feed their children, how to not die of malaria, or even how to manage day-to-day, and where their next meal will come from. Things that the average person (like the actually privileged author) living in a WEIRD country has little to no experience with. A large chunk of the countries on Earth (with a majority of the global population) could be accurately described as having "developing" economies. To better themselves; individually and collectively - these people need access to more (and not less) energy that is 1) cheap, 2) reliable, and 3) scaleable. Like it or not, fossil fuels are the only thing that fits all 3 of the above criteria. If your basic unit of value is human flourishing and betterment, then having these countries employ more fossil fuels to power their escape from entropy is the best way to support that goal. See Alex Epstein's The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels for a deep dive, and Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress; as well. There is also lots of talk here about the ever-elusive "systemic" racism in the West, "marginalization," and other assorted tidbits of leftist jargon that are somehow never defined, or directly identified. The author even managed to shoe-horn in some bit of low-resolution garbage about trans people (somehow); in a book about microbes, no less. He says: "Transgender people also face a disproportionate risk of death – double that of cisgender people – in large part because of a lack of access to adequate healthcare and high rates of violence and discrimination."[CITATION MISSING] He conveniently does not mention that something like 70-80% of self-identified trans individuals have many underlying serious psychological comorbidities, like major depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar (and others). Sadly, trans-identifying people have a roughly 40% attempted suicide rate He also drops this quote, which seems to contradict itself as it goes, unless I am missing something. He first talks about how men suffer from certain diseases at much higher rates than women, but then goes on to tell the reader about how women are the real victims, because of "socioeconomic and gender-based social inequalities." That's right, we're competing in the Victimology Olympics now: "For example, in the developed world, women who are female at birth typically live longer than their biological male equivalents and are less likely than men to experience a heart attack, cancer (excluding those found in sex organs), alcoholism, cirrhosis, Parkinson’s, schizophrenia, Autism Spectrum Disorders (even when accounting for diagnostic bias)23, 24 or substance abuse. Which brings us around to the larger question here: What the fuck does any of this stuff have to do with microbiomes and literal bacteria??? Answer: Absolutely nothing. But the thing is that ideological possession is a hell of a drug. Just like an evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves... God, it's all so tiresome. It would be nice to pick up a book about science without reading some low-grade Neo-Marxist garbage about victimology and racial politicking. I really hate when authors of science books cram in their own shit-tier political takes into books where they have absolutely no business being, and my ratings will always reflect this. Fortunately, the author never went full tilt, and managed to keep a bit of a leash on his rantings. It was still irritating AF, tho. ******************** Fortunately, despite my complaints above, the book did actually contain quite a lot of interesting writing. For this reason, I would still recommend it. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 23, 2023
|
Dec 2023
|
Nov 09, 2023
|
Hardcover
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.15
|
it was ok
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
||||||
3.97
|
it was amazing
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
||||||
3.85
|
liked it
|
Jul 27, 2024
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
||||||
4.21
|
it was ok
|
Jul 02, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.75
|
did not like it
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
||||||
3.64
|
it was ok
|
May 21, 2024
|
May 16, 2024
|
||||||
4.16
|
liked it
|
May 09, 2024
|
May 07, 2024
|
||||||
3.64
|
really liked it
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 03, 2024
|
||||||
4.15
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.56
|
it was ok
|
May 17, 2024
|
Apr 19, 2024
|
||||||
4.03
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 21, 2024
|
Apr 05, 2024
|
||||||
3.84
|
liked it
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
Apr 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.79
|
liked it
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 04, 2024
|
||||||
4.10
|
it was amazing
|
Jan 30, 2024
|
Jan 29, 2024
|
||||||
3.75
|
liked it
|
Feb 06, 2024
|
Jan 26, 2024
|
||||||
3.93
|
liked it
|
Jan 28, 2024
|
Jan 23, 2024
|
||||||
3.83
|
really liked it
|
Dec 09, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
||||||
3.98
|
it was ok
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 04, 2023
|
||||||
4.02
|
really liked it
|
Nov 22, 2023
|
Nov 15, 2023
|
||||||
4.19
|
liked it
|
Dec 2023
|
Nov 09, 2023
|