|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B0BTZW48Q6
| 3.55
| 32,318
| Sep 12, 2023
| Sep 12, 2023
|
really liked it
| “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?” He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing qui “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?” He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,” he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?” Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire — these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light”) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother — who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip — had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge”; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity” known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood — we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten — and as Belle has “treatments” in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals — so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams — and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow” — a brightening or moon-like luminosity — of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror and as a warning. The storytelling is cinematic (the publisher’s blurb describes this as “Snow White meets Eyes Wide Shut”, and that feels about right), and while there are some funny bits, it’s of the wincing, ironic variety. More than anything, this is creeping horror — showcasing the horrors of modern life — wrapped in fairy tale motifs, and it made for a compelling read that I felt in my bones. Just to my tastes. Merged review: “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?” He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,” he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?” Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire — these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light”) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother — who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip — had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge”; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity” known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood — we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten — and as Belle has “treatments” in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals — so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams — and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow” — a brightening or moon-like luminosity — of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror and as a warning. The storytelling is cinematic (the publisher’s blurb describes this as “Snow White meets Eyes Wide Shut”, and that feels about right), and while there are some funny bits, it’s of the wincing, ironic variety. More than anything, this is creeping horror — showcasing the horrors of modern life — wrapped in fairy tale motifs, and it made for a compelling read that I felt in my bones. Just to my tastes. Merged review: “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?” He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,” he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?” Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire — these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light”) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother — who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip — had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge”; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity” known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood — we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten — and as Belle has “treatments” in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals — so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams — and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow” — a brightening or moon-like luminosity — of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Mar 17, 2023
not set
|
Mar 20, 2023
not set
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
9791032814673
| B0CPFS7VJ2
| 3.57
| 194
| Sep 15, 2023
| Dec 27, 2023
|
really liked it
| “Do you still consider Yudin a suspect?” “Do you still consider Yudin a suspect?” A knock on the door in the middle of the night — an unannounced visit from the KGB in 1950s Moscow — and Special Prosecutor Nikitich is called upon to investigate the mysterious disappearance of nine fit and experienced young hikers who had set out on a routine mountain trek. Although Nikitich would eventually come under pressure to close this case quickly, the circumstances were strange — the expedition's tent was cut open from the inside, many of the hikers were found in the snow in various states of undress, some had signs of radiation exposure, some had compression injuries, strange lights had been sighted in the sky that night — and "The Dyatlov Pass Incident" would go on to become one of those enduring "unexplained mysteries", source of much speculation and conspiracy theories. As a graphic novel, The Dyatlov Pass Mystery presents what is known in two timelines — following the prosecutor's investigation in one thread, and what is known of the hikers' experience from their actual diaries and photographs — and more than anything, this is the story of the prosecutor himself and his earnest attempt to solve the case before being shut down by the Soviet regime. As such, author Cédric Mayen doesn't attempt to solve this historic mystery (although he does allow his prosecutor to entertain the most outlandish theories) and while this account is respectful to the memories of those who lost their lives that frigid night some sixty years ago, it is faithful to what is actually known by leaving the mystery unsolved. I had heard of this mysterious story before, and totally enjoyed this treatment by Mayen and illustrator Jandro González; a delightful way to close out 2023. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley prepublication.) [image] I thoroughly enjoyed the drab, colourless illustrations in the sections from the prosecutor's POV; the even more colourless sections recounting the hikers' story. Mayen imagines some interpersonal stresses that may have led to problems between the hikers, but ultimately, in his day, the prosecutor wasn't given enough information to solve the mystery; leading to outlandish theories. [image] In the end, and likely appropriately, Mayen shows the prosecutor haunted by the ghosts of the hikers: [image] In an end section titled "The Dossier", Mayen includes interviews with several modern day investigators who claim to have solved the Dyatlov Pass mystery (were the hikers victim of a kabatic wind? a slab avalanche?), and most interesting to me, he cites a popular website by Russian investigator Teodora Hadjiyska, and then notes that after agreeing to an interview with him, Hadliyska has since disappeared. And ain't that a crazy symmetry? Loved this. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||||
0889779813
| 9780889779815
| 0889779813
| 3.58
| 12
| unknown
| Jan 27, 2024
|
really liked it
| Challenge to Civilization: Indigenous Wisdom and the Future is the third book in my series on Indigenous spirituality. The Knowledge Seeker addressed Challenge to Civilization: Indigenous Wisdom and the Future is the third book in my series on Indigenous spirituality. The Knowledge Seeker addressed the nature and viability of Indigenous beliefs, and Loss of Indigenous Eden examined how Indigenous sacred knowledge became oppressed, suppressed, and discounted. This book will demonstrate that Indigenous spirituality is not only still relevant but will be critical to human survival in terms of restoring balance with both natural and supernatural worlds. Dr A. Blair Stonechild is a Cree-Saulteaux member of the Muscowpetung First Nation, professor of Indigenous Studies at First Nations University of Canada, a residential school survivor, and the author of several books on Indigenous history and spirituality. Stonechild’s Challenge to Civilization perfectly captures humanity’s current precarious position at the brink of self-destruction and makes the dual points that there was nothing inevitable about the rise of Western civilisation — one need only look to the Australian Aborigines’ sixty-thousand years of continual culture to recognise that a life lived in spiritual harmony with the environment is stable and indefinitely sustainable, whereas our six thousand year journey of greed and expansion since the first city at Ur has brought us to the point of collapse — and that it’s not too late to embrace the original, Indigenous practices that were once common to everyone on earth. I found quite a bit of this confronting, but mostly because I’m a product of Western culture and its education system; really thinking about what Stonechild has to say, it’s hard to find fault with his conclusions. Fascinating, mind-expanding read. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quotes may not be in their final forms.) Civilization has waged a relentless and often violent campaign to colonize Indigenous Peoples emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually. Part of this campaign has been to portray Indigenous societies as proto-civilizations that would have eventually trodden the path of human self-centredness, greed, and destructiveness. As an alternative, I create the word “ecolization” — a state in which humans recognize that they are not the central purpose of creation, remain grateful for the opportunity to experience physical life, and continue to obey the Creator’s “original instructions”. Stonechild describes his “ecolizations” as hunter-gatherer societies, in which people lived in harmony with nature, only taking what they needed from the commons, and making decisions through group consultation, meditation, and communication with the spiritual. If I had a complaint about this, it would be that he treats all communities outside of Western civilisation (including pre-colonised India and pre-Opium Wars China) as living this way — from the Aztecs, to the Celts, to anyone the Romans called “Barbarians'' — and I’m not sure that this is strictly true. On the other hand, there’s no denying that if Homo sapiens have been around for 600 000+ years, and it has only been since 1820 that “civilised” folks outnumbered the Indigenous around the world, the survival of our species did seem better guaranteed in pre-civilsed times. More than once, Stonechild takes issue with the Hobbesian “nasty, brutish, and short” denigration of a life lived in harmony with nature. In mainstream education we are taught that archeologists, geneticists, and other scientists are convinced that life originated from some sort of biological soup. It is contended that we, as humans, are simply advanced apes — a sort of evolutionary accident. But such an account never existed among Indigenous Peoples. The theory of evolution has been around for less than 200 years, compared to Indigenous stories, such as humanity’s coming from the stars, that have existed for tens of thousands of years. So why are Indigenous stories not given more credence, or at least equal exposure to scientific accounts? I did find this line of thought confronting — that evolution is a “theory”, no more valid as an explanation for the appearance of human consciousness than the Indigenous belief that we came from the stars (and again, is this a universal Indigenous belief?) — and while on the one hand I can feel defensive of the scientific tradition (in which I was raised and educated), on the other, I have to agree that science seems to be mostly in the service of extracting resources, expanding populations, and providing militaries with ever-deadlier weapons of mass destruction; what if we did all behave as though our purpose on earth was to learn through relationships without harm? (And speaking of science and those who thought of First Nations as “primitive” because they didn’t have Old World technology, Stonechild writes, “Indigenous Peoples, given tens of thousands of years of careful development guided by higher virtues, would have eventually discovered all of today’s sciences and technologies, and even more. However, these would have been acquired in a wisely considered way, and as such, would be safe and beneficial for future generations.” More to think on.) The wetiko (greed-driven) cultures that are now in control of world affairs pretend to solve problems through a combination of rationalism, economic development, and military threat. Unfortunately, they lack spiritual authority and will never possess it until they reconcile with Indigenous Peoples and their ancient wisdom. Only a moral revolution can bring humanity back to its original path. What if we could redirect our intellectual, economic, and technological energies into healing Earth? This would lead us closer to a future that recognizes, celebrates, and honours the higher nature of our species. Stonechild writes that even if we made the decision today to embrace Indigenous wisdom as a way to direct world affairs, it could take thousands of years to regain harmony and stability. He acknowledges that we’re not going to give up all of our comforts, but he’s not wrong that Western society is sick and pushing the planet to environmental ruin. Reading this book, and really taking the time to think about what he’s saying — dismissing the voice of rationality that says, “How? There’s no way. Others will always be greedy even if I’m not...” and embracing the spiritual voice that says, “You were not made to live like this...” — there’s something to Stonechild’s argument that feels satisfying and true. And yet the rational voice keeps popping up because that is what I’m steeped in. I know I’ll keep thinking on this and am enlarged for having read this. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Dec 30, 2023
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593801563
| 9780593801567
| 0593801563
| 3.58
| 433
| unknown
| Mar 19, 2024
|
really liked it
| I had been alone for weeks I had been alone for weeks Every now and then I read a book of poetry, but I really don’t know anything about poetry; I just know what moves me. I read A Year of Last Things: Poems because I’ve read, and admired, several of Michael Ondaatje’s novels, but this feels like an apples and oranges situation. Several of the poems in this collection did move me (at any rate, many stanzas did), but overall, I couldn’t say what even qualifies some of these entries as poetry (several look and read like prose: without line breaks, rhythm, or rhyme), so I’m satisfied to attribute any failure to click to my own shortcomings. I do admire the effort and am happy to have now sampled more of Ondaatje’s writing. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and excerpts quoted may not be in their final forms; it's unfortunate that I can't recreate line indents here.) When that English novelist A Year of Last Things is autobiographical and intertextual — Ondaatje references his own work (explaining the inspirations behind characters in Anil’s Ghost and The Cat’s Table [one assumes the “book about a dying man” referred to in that first poem is The English Patient]) and he quotes from and makes reference to a wide panoply of artists and poets, from Bashō to Chuck Berry — and there’s a wistful sense of looking back and taking stock (with neither women nor pets sticking around forever). The landscape moves from Sri Lanka to Pompei to a “bus travelling from Marrakesh to Fez”, and throughout, there are countless rivers and estuaries; time flowing like water. This reads exactly as what it is: a successful novelist returning to poetry in his golden years to capture something of the breadth of his interests and experience. As for the poems, some did work for me, as in this opening to “Wanderer”: Let us speak about our And some were less successful for me, as in “The Cabbagetown Pet Clinic”, shared here in its entirety: For years I wrote during Again: I have no tools with which to pry apart these poems and understand their construction, so I can only report on their surface effect; an uneven experience for me, but I’m rounding up to four stars because this feels successful (if a bit over my own head). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 28, 2023
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Dec 28, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0300265921
| 9780300265927
| 0300265921
| 4.45
| 88
| unknown
| Apr 09, 2024
|
it was amazing
| How many times, over the years, would my father remind me — quoting Martin Heidegger — that “Language is the house of being”? It would be decades b How many times, over the years, would my father remind me — quoting Martin Heidegger — that “Language is the house of being”? It would be decades before I’d read those words myself in a book by the German philosopher — who was also a member of the Nazi Party — and feel again that sharp pang of recognition: the difficult knowledge that some of the most enduring ideas had been written by complicated figures, like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in racial hierarchies, inherent superiority and inferiority. More and more I would come to understand that it was not simply ignorance that I’d need to push back against, but also the stores of received knowledge — philosophy, history, science — that I would encounter in the most learned places. Written by Pulitzer Prize winning poet, Professor of Creative Writing, and two time US Poet Laureate Natasha Trethewey, The House of Being is thoughtful, compelling, and quotable on literally every page. As part of Yale University Press’ “Why I Write” series (former entries include those written by Joy Harjo, Karl Ove Knausgaard, and Patti Smith), Trethewey answers the question deeply and provocatively. With a white father and a Black mother (whose marriage wasn’t even legal at the time Trethewey was born) and a grandmother whose house was situated deep in Mississippi at the intersection of two highways — one famous for the Blues and one named for Thomas Jefferson — Trethewey was intimately shaped by the local geography and its competing narratives and prejudices. Combining history, memoir, and a lifetime of meditation on the forces that shaped her, this is a masterwork; thoroughly satisfying and necessary. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) My need to make meaning from the geography of my past is not unlike the ancients looking to the sky at the assortment of stars and drawing connections between them: the constellations they named inscribing a network of stories that gave order and meaning to their lives. That’s one of the reasons I write. I’ve needed to create the narrative of my life — its abiding metaphors — so that my story would not be determined for me. Trethewey’s father — a poet himself — taught her early to describe the world around her metaphorically. In later life, people would assume that she “learned to write” from her father, but Trethewey insists that she learned as much from her grandmother — particularly the rhythms she picked up from her grandmother’s sewing machine — and from her mother, she learned how to use her voice to speak back to power; as when her mother would sing an inspirational version of John Brown’s Body whenever they drove past a Confederate flag (as on their state flag): Singing to me as we passed the state flag of Mississippi was a way to counteract the symbolic, psychic violence of it. Through the triumphant, stirring rhythms of the song, my mother was showing me how to signify, how to use received forms to challenge the dominant cultural narrative of our native geography, and to transcend it by imagining a reality in which justice was possible. Her voice was a counterweight. From her grandmother living at the crossroads of the Blues (according to legend, guitarist Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil in order to play as well as he did — which obviously discounts his talent, skill, and practise), to the whitewashing of nearby Ship Island (a prison for Confederate soldiers that has a plaque at its entrance, thanks to the United Daughters of the Confederacy, that lists the names of every white soldier held prisoner there but which doesn’t acknowledge anywhere that the guards were all formerly enslaved Black men that had fought for the Union Army), the geography of her childhood had effects that were both intimately particular to Trethewey herself and broadly metaphorical of the American ethos. Wanting to add her voice to those who would confront the dominant narrative perfectly answers why Trethewey writes. The act of writing is a way to create another world in language, a dwelling place for the psyche wherein the chaos of the external world is transformed, shaped into a made thing, and ordered. It is an act of reclamation. And resistance: the soul sings for justice and the song is poetry. This is a short read, but weighty and compelling. I loved the whole thing. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Dec 20, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
9798870969206
| B0CPQC5L7N
| 3.17
| 127
| Dec 07, 2023
| Dec 07, 2023
|
liked it
| The Utahraptor stood tall — twelve feet tall — before her, clothed only in his feathers and a jaunty Santa hat. His massive hocks rested half-on th The Utahraptor stood tall — twelve feet tall — before her, clothed only in his feathers and a jaunty Santa hat. His massive hocks rested half-on the lawn, crushing the gentle brush of snow that had fallen earlier that morning, and in one of his little hands he carried a large tin of Quality Street chocolates. Okay, I can explain…I’ve never read anything like this before, and while my first instinct is to say that this follows the plot of a Hallmark Christmas movie — but with a hunky dinosaur love interest — I would have to then admit that I’ve never seen a Hallmark Christmas movie. But I’ve been really busy lately, and I was looking for something short and mindless, and honestly, All I Want for Christmas is Utahraptor is not the worst book I’ve ever read, by a long shot. Author Lola Faust (a pseudonym, apparently) doesn’t take the subject matter seriously, this is full on camp — with just the right amount of “follow your heart” and “love is love”, and aren’t those the themes explored in historical pulp fiction? Didn’t they used to write about sexy vampires as code for the queer love they weren't allowed to write about? I might not have gone into this thinking that I was the true target audience, but I was totally entertained…and maybe a tiny bit moved. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) In her senior year they’d met Rob, a PhD student from Australia, who was studying the implications of DNA deterioration on the culture of dinosaur populations in Tasmania. Holly had been captivated by his interest in dinos; he was the first person she’d met in the wider world who took dino culture seriously, seeing it as a genuine foundational aspect of dino society rather than a veneer imposed on them by human society, seeing dinos as fully conscious, fully sentient beings who deserved equality and consideration. Holly Grant lives with her ultrarich boyfriend in Chicago, selling thrifted antiques in an online shop. They’ve been together for four years with no engagement (let alone marriage) on the horizon, and as Thad spends ever more time as a The Utahraptor brought his muzzle to Holly’s mouth and nuzzled. The little feathers on his cheeks tickled her as he rolled his lizard-lips against hers, careful not to slice her open with his sharp predator teeth. It was the strangest and most alluring kiss Holly had ever received. An explicit scene does follow, but it’s so campy and implausible that I don’t think it’s meant to be taken seriously (he begins by exploring her “love-swamp, moist and humid as the Cretaceous jungle the Utahraptor’s ancestors would have stalked through in their search for food,” and that made me guffaw.) And I see other readers are pleased that Rocky asks for consent at every stage, but some state that there ought to be a trigger warning for Holly cheating on Thad, even though he was really a jerk and Holly had already decided that the relationship was over. I offer these points to underline that I am not the usual reader of Romance or Erotica, so I’m not critical of the tropes, just reporting my experience. I will also note that some reviewers didn’t like where the story went “religious”, but this is Utah, and while Holly’s Dad was a non-practising Mormon (having lost his faith when his wife died of cancer years before), I appreciated his acceptance of the daughter-dino relationship: “The Church is a human institution. We built it to honour God — but humans built it, and humans are fallible. The bond between a parent and child, though…that is God’s own work. And loving you, whatever choices you make, is loving God.” I’m no expert on the genre, but I didn’t hate this. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 18, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
1738681807
| 9781738681808
| B0CGM7XG6X
| 3.50
| 2
| unknown
| Aug 23, 2023
|
really liked it
| The purpose of our life is sometimes known to us, and sometimes it isn’t. We may have changed someone’s time here by setting them on a different pa The purpose of our life is sometimes known to us, and sometimes it isn’t. We may have changed someone’s time here by setting them on a different path. Or we may have made them feel just a little bit better with our smile. We may not know what our purpose is, but knowing it is less important than living it. I don’t know if mine has a name, but I believe I have found it in my moments. I hope my stories help you share yours. Raynia Carr has worked as a medical social worker in hospital settings for the past couple decades and the interactions that she’s had with patients (many elderly, many at the end of their lives) has prompted her to think deeply on her own life; tying key memories to lessons learned, sharing how those learnings often became applicable later. Moments is a collection of essays (each chapter themed on a topic like Hope, Courage, and Gratitude), each including these personal stories, and the whole making for an interesting and relatable memoir. Carr doesn’t share a lot from her work life — this would not truly be categorised as a medical memoir — but she has something to say and a smooth delivery that made for an interesting read. (Note: I’m rounding up to four stars to reflect my admiration for a debut effort. Note also: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) What if we were to view death as part of the certain, albeit unknown, lived experience? What if we spent our lives not running with our feet pounding on the pavement but instead we floated through it like a river, secure in knowing that death is our final harbour? I was particularly interested in Carr’s writing on the topic of death and the lessons that she’s taken away from her interaction with patients: Start talking about death and its practicalities, live life as though death was near, and do not fear the unknown. This last was particularly compelling as Carr explains: No one knows what happens once our last breath is taken. We spend our time agonizing, fearing, dreading, and doing everything we can to avoid it, yet it is an absolute fact that it will happen. If we can be aware of our fears around this, we can allow the mystery of life to take its course and have faith in knowing that, in the end, there is an infinite space where we go, returning to the same source from where we came. I was right there with her until she seemed to contradict herself (but I would like to have such faith in knowing where we end up.) One thing I have learned so far from parents, children, friends, and patients is this: the big moments are important, but so much more happens during the spaces in between. I speak of those times that aren’t planned in our calendars: strolling in meadows; falling in love; finding hope in times of adversity; watching the sun as it sets in a clear evening sky; accepting an ending; growing old; conquering a fear; giving birth; smiling at a stranger; failing at something; watching a flock of birds take flight; making mistakes; feeling an animal's care; meeting new people while away; seeing an ocean wave approach and recede and knowing it’s been doing this forever. These moments are the stories that make our lives, and the ones that truly matter in the end. Most of the writing in Moments is about Carr’s core memories (lies told, classroom injustice, first loves) but she does a commendable job of linking the big moments with small ones to demonstrate common themes that played out throughout her life. In a way, this works as a guide — maybe even an impetus — for others to explore their own core memories — the big and small moments — that have made up their own lives. I enjoyed this and feel inspired. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 14, 2023
|
Dec 17, 2023
|
Dec 18, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0571381383
| 9780571381388
| B0CJT42YKP
| 3.90
| 4,215
| Apr 02, 2024
| Apr 02, 2024
|
it was amazing
| The professor’s study was like a painting. It had a sofa and a table that ran along the back, two lamps and jars of pens. The desk had an antique g The professor’s study was like a painting. It had a sofa and a table that ran along the back, two lamps and jars of pens. The desk had an antique globe on it and a lot of paper folders. It faced glass doors that led onto a balcony overlooking the garden at the back, towards the shops on Caledonian Road. The garden was full of flowers and his wife was down there, watering the plants. On a bookcase to the side of the desk was a typewriter and Milo saw various piles of books; on top of one of them was a watch and a passport. The publisher’s blurb calls Caledonian Road a “state-of-the-nation novel”, and that is precisely what it is. Opening in May of 2021 and covering nearly a year — from the loosening of pandemic restrictions to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — big events play out in the background as a wide range of characters experience life in the heart of London in ways that precisely capture the mood of our times: this is one of those rare novels that I can imagine people reading long into the future to see how we lived and thought in this moment. Author Andrew O’Hagan explores issues of class and race and justice along Caledonian Road’s mile and a half length — a North London thoroughfare famous for its high ethnic diversity and staggering disparity of wealth — and through conversations held between a variety of characters, a large breadth of ideas are offered and challenged. This is epic in scope and succeeds completely. This will, no doubt, be huge for O’Hagan upon release in 2024 and I am grateful for the early access. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) As he sifted through the ties, he knew the truth. Campbell would continue persuading himself that his book was a ripe and playful intellectual riposte to the times they were living through, but in fact he’d just needed the money. He lived with his duplicity as if it was an energy. He failed to see the danger in any of it. He had identified a daft subject with Why Men Weep in Their Cars, a daft subject he had immediately commodified to his own advantage, hoping it would be the huge bestseller that might relieve him. Campbell Flynn is a celebrity intellectual: climbing from humble Glaswegian roots, he met a higher class of people at Cambridge (his best friend would go on to earn a knighthood, Campbell himself married the daughter of a Countess), and on the basis of a celebrated biography of the painter Vermeer, Campbell landed a lectureship at University College (despite not having a PhD), hosts a popular podcast, writes for fashion and news magazines, and has anonymously written a maybe-tongue-in-cheek self-help book for the “easy” money. Fresh on the heels of penning a controversial essay on the vanity behind liberal guilt for The Atlantic, Campbell begins a working relationship with one of his former students, Milo Manghasa, speaking here: “Mum used to say it was the genuine task in anybody’s life, to find your country.” Milo has a Masters in Computer Science, and with an Irish father and an Ethiopian mother, he’s from the poorer side of Caledonian Road; still rubbing elbows with the boyhood friends who are now gangbanging wannabe rapstars while joining Campbell for drinks at his exclusive club and challenging the professor’s own performative liberalism. This relationship delights and energises Campbell — he’s the kind of guy who thinks that unquestioningly accepting his queer daughter’s nonbinary partner means that he has nothing to learn about the world, but Milo challenges him on everything — so Campbell makes himself vulnerable to actions that Milo considers “an experiment in justice” (for example: when small amounts of money from Campbell’s bank accounts are redirected to charity without his prior knowledge, Campbell is both delighted by Milo’s presumed hacking skills and open to experiencing whatever Milo has in mind for him next.) At one point, Milo says to Campbell, “We are who we know.” And while that’s meant to stain Campbell with the sins of his friends (Campbell’s best friend, William, is under investigation for various business-related crimes and at risk of losing his knighthood; Campbell’s sister-in-law is married to a Duke whose offences might run even deeper), there is irony in knowing who Milo consorts with: his oldest friend is a knife-toting weed-dealer and Milo’s girlfriend, Gosia, is the sister of a drug and human trafficker (who, ironically, imports the slave labour for Campbell’s best friend’s sweatshops). There are many levels at which people are interconnected — with Campbell and Milo both being basically decent people wanting a better world at the centre of the circles — and insanely wealthy Russian kleptocrats keeping the circles spinning with their money-laundering and influence-peddling. Throw in Campbell’s wife (an astute therapist), their son Angus (a jet-setting celebrity DJ who makes more money than his parents), their daughter Kenzie (beautiful enough to have worked as a model, but interested in a simpler life), Campbell’s sister Moira (a lawyer and sitting Member of Parliament), various journalists, Lords, and working-class folks, and there is a huge variety of experience and opinion explored; all of it adding up to a recognisable snapshot of our modern experience. A sampling of quotes: • Police invented the sickness they prosecute. Filing false reports, lying under oath, planting evidence, controlling the streets, kneeling on people’s necks. You talk about assault: police invented that stuff, and they get lucky every day because you want to play their game. You talk about Tupac being a gangster. That’s where he failed. He was a philosopher. He was the son of a Black Panther. He got lost, bro. As much as I recognise the progressive themes that are being advocated for in this novel, the particular details are very specific to Caledonian Road/London/Great Britain and I am looking forward to seeing what local readers make of this. The Russians, The Firm, Brexit, local Councils: there are power dynamics here that I recognise without really knowing, so I can only really conclude that, to an outsider, O’Hagan totally captured the state-of-his-nation. He’d always felt shielded by irony and art’s mysteries, but sitting in his cosy hut, it again occurred to Campbell that he was not above it all. Maybe that’s the way a crisis gathers force and dimension in a person’s life, when anxiety metastasises from one damaged area to another. Running to epic length — six hundred and some pages — there is plenty of engaging plot in Caledonian Road, but it did feel a bit long. And if I had another complaint: the women characters are less interesting than the men; either saintly, brainy, and beautiful (like Campbell’s wife, sister, and daughter; Milo’s girlfriend) or self-serving and nasty (like William’s wife or “the woman downstairs”), but where it focuses on men, this could also be taken as a state-of-the-male novel; there is a reason, after all, that Campbell saw a market for a self-help book entitled “Why Men Weep in Their Cars”, and I was interested in the whole thing. I can’t give fewer than the full five stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
Dec 14, 2023
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0385550367
| 9780385550369
| 0385550367
| 4.52
| 100,732
| Mar 19, 2024
| Mar 19, 2024
|
it was amazing
| My name is James. I wish I could tell my story with a sense of history as much as industry. I was sold when I was born and then sold again. My moth My name is James. I wish I could tell my story with a sense of history as much as industry. I was sold when I was born and then sold again. My mother’s mother was from someplace on the continent of Africa, I have been told or perhaps simply assumed. I cannot claim to any knowledge of that world or those people, whether my people were kings or beggars…I can tell you that I am a man who is cognizant of his world, a man who has a family, who loves a family, who has been torn from his family, a man who can read and write, a man who will not let his story be self-related, but self-written. I absolutely loved The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and thought that, by the end, Mark Twain had done a remarkable job of humanising runaway Jim (to the white audience of his day) through his developing relationship with young Huck on a raft down the Mississippi (and that Twain had also done a remarkable job of demonstrating how sociopathic Tom Sawyer [and by extension, white society in general] was, in that he never once acted as though Jim was a fellow human being). And as someone who has enjoyed other retellings of classic literature that give voice to marginalised characters, I was very excited to be given an early review copy of Percival Everett’s James. And what a retelling it is! Starting off in the familiar territory of Hannibal, Missouri, Everett gives us a peek inside the enslaved’s quarters — where life is not exactly what the overseers might expect — and as the narrative unfurls in ways both familiar and unexpected, we are experiencing life from the POV of James: a justifiably wary man who knows how to stay invisible to white people while surreptitiously reading Voltaire, debating Locke in his dreams, and developing his thoughts on paper whenever he gets the chance. What Everett does most masterfully (and arguably, most necessarily) is to upend Twain’s narrative: the reader doesn’t need a perilous adventure story (or a white author, or a protective relationship with an outsider white child) to explain that James is a moral, intelligent, and altruistic bulwark against the violent chaos of his society; Everett gives James agency and a voice, and James tells us what kind of man he is himself, through his deeds and in his own words. James doesn’t stick exactly to the storyline of Huckleberry Finn, and that was just fine with me: this is James’ story, and I am delighted to have heard it from the man himself. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Night fell like a different animal, its own season. My voice, even in my head, had found its root in my diaphragm, had become sonorous and round. My pencil had more firmly grasped the pages of my newly dried notebook. I saw more clearly, farther, further. My name became my own. James doesn’t have the satire or the humour of The Trees (the only other book I’ve read, and loved, by Everett), but it does indulge in self-aware irony (James even discusses with a friend early on whether a white man getting drunk because Black men can’t would be “an example of proleptic irony or dramatic irony”... “could be both.”) And it doesn’t shy away from describing the brutality the enslaved faced; even the so-called “good” white people are self-serving hypocrites (and in one of James’ dream debates, he makes the case that there is no such thing as a good member of the citizenry who lives in a society that employs slavery). I appreciated where Everett imagined new adventures for James (and especially when he joined a minstrel show as a commentary on the songs they performed: I did not know that songs like Turkey in the Straw and the Blue Tail Fly were written by white men as appropriative entertainment), but I was more challenged by the ways in which Everett changed the relationship between James and Huckleberry. Challenged, but I grew to appreciate it: this is James’ story, and we really don’t need to view him through the lens of a white character to see that he’s a good man. “To fight in a war,” he said. “Can you imagine?” Yes, James and Huck float down the Mighty Mississip, having adventures and facing dangers along the way, but Everett has a different ending in mind than Twain’s: as the Civil War dawns, James’ main priority is to make it back to his wife and daughter in Hannibal, and Everett gives the man more grit and agency than a punk kid like Tom Sawyer could have imagined: My name is James. I’m going to get my family. You can come with me or you can stay here. You can come and try freedom or you can stay here. You can die with me trying to find freedom or you can stay here and be dead anyway. My name is James. I still think that Huckleberry Finn was a perfect novel for its day, and by giving voice and agency to that novel’s heart and soul, Percival Everett has written a perfect novel for our own times. I flew through James and can imagine reading it again more slowly: this is, obviously, going to be huge in 2024. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1646221788
| 9781646221783
| 1646221788
| 4.12
| 278
| Mar 12, 2024
| Mar 12, 2024
|
really liked it
| What the records tell us is this: human desire is a powerful thing. It is also ephemeral, lost in the moment it is felt, though its traces remain i What the records tell us is this: human desire is a powerful thing. It is also ephemeral, lost in the moment it is felt, though its traces remain in the world long after. From a swelled root to a crinkled leaf: in the plants we eat, there are remnants of our search for the medicinal and the palatable, and in their genetic makeup, a record of our movements between places. As written by the child of immigrants — author Jessica J. Lee has a Taiwanese mother, a Welsh father, and was born and raised in Canada — Dispersals shares a unique view on what it means to be “out of place”; whether considering plants or people, she makes the case that the language we use regarding what is “foreign” is pretty similar. Lee has an impressive educational background (with a Masters in International Development and a PhD in Environmental History and Aesthetics), and has travelled widely — working and living in Germany and England for the past several years — and as she now teaches Creative Writing at the University of Cambridge, she is, from every angle, perfectly experienced to think and write on these themes. Dispersals is a collection of essays that combines Lee’s personal stories with geography, science, and philosophy, and in each one, she displays deep thinking, fascinating facts, and clear writing. I don’t know what I was expecting from this book, but I enjoyed it a lot. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I am fascinated by the way words can be bound tight to past places, by the way a simple question can unfold an entire scene, long thought forgotten. The way a fruit — even just its mention — can carry more than its weight in flesh. This quote is from a section on mangoes, and this plant is one of several that Lee links to the history of empire-building (with the shorthand history being that Portugal first popularised the mango when they brought it out of their colonies in India). Lee quotes from E. M. Forster’s A Passage to India and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, demonstrating how over the decades, the literary treatment of this fruit has become “extraordinarily fraught…signifying exoticism performed for a white gaze.” Lee has similar treatments for cherry trees — it’s interesting to learn that the corridor formerly occupied by the Berlin Wall is now planted with thousands of cherry trees gifted from Japan after its fall, but also that Japan has a long history of planting cherry trees in countries they have colonised [ie, Korea and Taiwan] in order to transform both landscapes and mindsets — and the history of tea (the secrets of its cultivation and processing were “stolen” from China by a British man disguised as a local), and as Lee grew up with parents who enjoyed two very different tea rituals, hers is an interesting take on how both plants and their related customs are translated across time and space. In addition to the big and showy, Lee writes about the small: the seaweeds, mosses, and fungi that are (mostly) accidentally transported around the world. And while in some cases these are harmless, she warns that there are always going to be those people wanting to return areas to some impossible-to-determine baseline “natural” state; which in Britain, she subtly links to xenophobia and Brexit; and having lived in Berlin, she makes a more overt link to Aryan notions of purity. Interesting stuff to think about. Simply through repetition — in storybooks and novels deemed classics, curricula — British landscapes come to signify romance, an ideal in nature. I pay no attention to flora outside my window — in a flat land of canola and corn, where forests are built of sugar maple and pines. I read so little of these plants, and in truth, they hold little interest for me. It will take me years before I realise that I’ve built my notions of beauty from the stories of a distant land. As I also grew up in the centre of Canada, I share Lee’s experience that the view outside my window doesn’t necessarily jibe with what I’ve been conditioned to consider idyllic beauty; and that’s an interesting effect of technically living in a colony. There’s a lot here on empires (including Lee’s increasing discomfort travelling on her British passport) and how delineating borders exacerbates the us-vs-them attitude (whether discussing people or plants), and for the most part, it’s a fair discussion of ideas I haven’t thought about in this way before. Worth the read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
Dec 03, 2023
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1662508026
| 9781662508028
| B0CHK7H3QH
| 3.65
| 913
| unknown
| Dec 26, 2023
|
liked it
| I’m absolutely certain that I’m now the most boring and ordinary that I’ve ever been. I’m very relaxed and surprisingly well mannered. I go to bed I’m absolutely certain that I’m now the most boring and ordinary that I’ve ever been. I’m very relaxed and surprisingly well mannered. I go to bed early, I avoid red meat and gluten, I get excited about trips to Costco. My slide to all this mundanity started in January 2019, when I tried to have a one-night stand with my high school boyfriend and accidentally married him instead. I’ve been aware of Katherine Ryan for several years now (particularly from her appearances on British talk and game shows), and having always enjoyed her storytelling, I thought that How to Accidentally Settle Down would be a short and sweet palate cleanser between more serious fare. And it is that: not quite 50 pages, Ryan briefly summarises her romantic life — from first love, Bobby, to more adult relationships (including a long stretch with a man she calls “Then Boyfriend” [TB]; the father of her first child, Violet), and finally a reconnection with Bobby twenty years later — and while Ryan describes everything with a sardonic, comedic touch, the stories tend to somehow have both too much and not enough detail. Ultimately: I don’t know if this needed to be written, but it was an entertaining enough reading experience; still interested in reading Ryan’s longer work. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) After my daughter, Violet, was born and her arrival didn’t miraculously transform a grown man, I joked that we’d wanted a “save the relationship” baby, but we’d ended up with a regular one instead. No one in my family or friendship group had ever been a massive fan of TB, but I stand by his good qualities now like I did then. He’s not a terrible person, just a bit of a dreamer, and we were wrong for each other. My daughter, I believe, just really wanted to be born. Souls can do that, you know. They — from, I dunno, space or wherever — can match you up with a random person, drag you from Canada to the UK, strike you down with lupus, and keep you in an unsuitable relationship just so that they can exist on Earth. It’s all part of their journey, and I would never resent Violet for what she had to do to get here. If anything, I respect the hustle. After describing her experiences with a few men that didn’t work out (nicknamed the Overlap, the Sketch Actor, the Comedy Producer [I basically have the same criteria as a giant panda for new relationships, in that if you put me in close enough proximity of a potential mate with adequate resources for long enough, we’ll eventually give breeding a go]), Ryan decided to concentrate on her career and single motherhood. I watched a video clip after reading this of Ryan being interviewed around the time the she had reconnected with Bobby and she describes how hard it was to introduce a man into the feminine, girl power space she and her daughter had forged for themselves, and I get that that must have been hard: you embrace this alternative model of, “We don’t need a man in the house to be a family,” and then you go and introduce a man into the house. Ryan doesn’t really go into this in the book (other than describing how ten-year-old Violet objected when the Danish commitment ceremony they participated in looked too much like a wedding), but as Katherine and Bobby have two more kids together now, it looks like a happy ending; and everyone deserves that. The days are long, but the years are short, and it’s on our minds that every minute we spend caring for our family is an investment in the beautiful future we are hopeful for, when all the kids are old enough to be our friends. Having a family with my high school boyfriend, just as my hormonal teenage brain predicted, is the type of basic shit that I’ve come to live for. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1804295396
| 9781804295397
| B0CKB6YTZS
| 3.64
| 315
| Jul 02, 2024
| Jul 23, 2024
|
it was amazing
| “I want to read about the trouble a person might have with making things. About what might stop a person from making things, making art, I mean. Li “I want to read about the trouble a person might have with making things. About what might stop a person from making things, making art, I mean. Like money,” Nicola added, “or time.” The Last Sane Woman is one of those confusing novels that makes my brain fire on all cylinders: format illuminates theme, messy but relatable characters unveil something true about humanity in the moment, and meaning comes as an epiphany in its aftermath. Debut novelist Hannah Regel, primarily known as a poet, writes with an impressionist’s sensibility — POV changes abruptly, long passages read as out-of-place metaphors, close-up details are fuzzy until one stands back and considers the whole — and throughout, she includes so much truth about women: about how they present themselves, their friendships, and their place in the arts. If I had written a review immediately, I might have rounded this down to four stars, but the more I think about it, the more I like it: rounding up to five. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Reading was easy. All she had to do was sit very still and the world would shift; inviting her in as a citizen, liking a tweet because it was true enough she could have written it. Watching, Nicola soon learnt, was also a form of taking part. A form that, sitting at her quiet desk in the Feminist Assembly, she felt impossible to get wrong. On its surface, this is a story of a young ceramicist, Nicola — newly graduated from art school and feeling directionless — who (more or less on a whim) inquires at a nonprofit archive of women’s work in the arts if they had any material on those women who had had difficulty with “making things”. The archivist gives her a never-before-explored box of letters written by a female potter who had killed herself in the 1980s without making a name for herself, and Nicola is immediately fascinated by the biography revealed by this one-sided correspondence between this unnamed potter (she always signs her name in “XX” kisses) and the mysterious “Susan” to whom she bares all. The further Nicola reads, the more she recognises correspondences with her own life and work, and tension arises as she realises she might be on the brink of uncovering a mystery. But that’s just the surface plot. (I don’t really consider what follows a spoiler, per se, but I enjoyed discovering these things on my own, so, forewarned.) I always look for the inspiration for a book’s title while reading and the phrase “the last sane woman” doesn’t appear in this one. And when I googled it, the closest I came was an article from The Guardian with AS Byatt’s review of The Last Sane Man by Tanya Harrod. As Byatt explains: “The last sane man" was a phrase used by Angela Carter to describe the potter, Michael Cardew. "Sane" in this context is associated with a simple life, and the ideal of the human as artist, art and life as one continuous work. (Further sleuthing and I learned that Angela Carter coined this phrase in her 1978 review of a monograph written on Cardew by Garth Clark.) Reading Byatt’s review, I could see where Regel took some points of inspiration from the life of this well-known male artist — and especially where it explains that Cardew attempted to shape public perception of his life with the letters he wrote; that makes for interesting speculation on how literally we are to interpret our own potter’s writings — but what I loved about this off-the-page research was that I felt like the character Nicola: acknowledging that art history is predominantly the story of men and trying to understand where our anonymous female potter might fit in. The format of this novel, as I said above, is not straightforward. POV shifts between Nicola’s life in modern-day London, passages that she reads from the letters — that can then suddenly shift to the potter going about her own life in the London of 30-40 years ago — and scenes from the POV of Susan, and how she reacts to the letters of her freewheeling friend (whom she does name for the reader) as she deals with denying her own artistic aspirations to become a young wife and mother. And frequently, Regel writes in long, confusing metaphors: The knuckle inside Susan, swelling with what she had failed to understand, turned purple with pride in her throat. The colour grew elbows, firmly in place, unable to interrupt. She had driven for eighteen years in the rain and she’d be damned if she unravelled now. And besides, she thought, it would be beyond absurd to alert a stranger to the black pool of solvents, dyes and fatty acids still bleeding out from under her chair and onto her feet, especially one in the middle of a monologue. She pulled a fitted sheet over her own stupidity and smoothed it out, waiting patiently for her accident to dry and for Marcella to finish. But as confusing as the POV shifts and the metaphorical passages can be, taken together, they seem to be the prose equivalent of the groundbreaking multimedia art that the potter creates: Face taut, she begins to arrange the shards. Working urgently with chapped hands she slathers ceramic mortar onto their new joins, following the contours of their freshly broken edges with intuitive speed. This way, the fragments shape themselves. Up, up. She chews her lip in concentration. Spots of blood rise from under the skin to meet the air that flaked them. She stands back to inspect her work. What does it want? Legs. Filling her nails with dirt she quickly folds the form back in on itself, hollowing it out before it sets, and gives the next instruction. Nerves. She hurries through a box of discarded farming tools and bits of machinery, collected on her evening walks through the fields. Without gloves she grabs at a spoke to free it from its wheel, ripping one and then another like screeching hairs, her palms now streaked in scars of rust. Strange fronds. She works them into the form like whiskers. Weirdly delicate. Freshly desperate. Not even pots anymore but innervated beings. Standing back from The Last Sane Woman, I can see where Regel dirtied her hands with muck and rust; this is art and there is truth at the heart of it, and what more could I want? A rather grinding autobiography, isn’t it? Same old, same old, but it can’t be helped. Life, when it is happening, doesn’t care to tell you which part is telling and what it tells. That is the frustration. I suppose all this aimless rambling is caught up in feelings of pointlessness and futility and the ever-increasing sense of ageing into an absence where every addition feels like a load, wiping tables, wedging clay. Most importantly, this is a feminist story of an anonymous woman artist, forgotten to history: the story of what she actually did, how she presented that to her best friend, how that friend interpreted events through her own experiences, and how bringing forward the forgotten stories inspires a new generation. The format does echo the potter’s nontraditional creations, and that’s what makes this art: it may not be to everyone’s taste, but it certainly was to mine. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 27, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 27, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1324073659
| 9781324073659
| 1324073659
| 3.84
| 420
| Apr 02, 2024
| Apr 02, 2024
|
liked it
| Maybe we haven’t spoken up for the others partly because of the unconscious, innate quality of our ties with them. Possibly we need the telescopic Maybe we haven’t spoken up for the others partly because of the unconscious, innate quality of our ties with them. Possibly we need the telescopic view — the distance of forgetting and the jolt of recognition as a remembrance surfaces — to know what we adore. Maybe we can only look back in longing, over time or space, when the object of our care is far away. And our old home is gone. We Loved it All wasn’t quite as interesting as I had hoped it would be: part memoir, part lament for disappearing species, I found this to be a tad dense and esoteric. Author Lydia Millet does include interesting facts about her family (her father was an Egyptologist and his father a globe-trotting diplomat), herself (she used the advance from the sale of her first novel to go to grad school to study conservation), and Americans in general (“a 2021 Pew Research poll suggested half of US adults are unable to read a book at even an eighth-grade level”), and she includes interesting facts about the deadly pressures we’re putting on animals and ecosystems, but the writing wasn’t always clear to me: not clear at the paragraph level or in its overall intent (I think this is meant to prove that storytelling is an important part of activism?) I admire Millet for what I’ve learned about her here — in addition to being a celebrated novelist, she has spent decades as an advocate for endangered species at the Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson — and I can agree that she is uniquely poised to comment on the connection between storytelling and activism, but I found this to be a bit of a slog, despite being interested in the topic; other readers’ experience will no doubt vary. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) My presence in both of these subcultures is liminal — I float around on the margins. Neither fish nor fowl. Not really an activist, due to my aversion to slogans and crowds and open conflict. But also not a constant participant in the establishments of publishing or writing. Since the social and economic hub of publishing is New York, where I’ve chosen not to live. And since most literary writers also work as professors at universities, which I’ve chosen not to do. Despite some personal stories, this doesn’t really read like a memoir; and despite some interesting facts (for instance: in 2018, the US budget for protecting endangered species from extinction was less than one-fifth of what Americans personally spent on Halloween costumes for their pets), this doesn’t really read like a call to action. And since Millet frequently makes the point that a percentage of Americans embrace anti-intellectualism as an “expression of personal liberty” (resulting in 40% of Americans believing that the sun revolves around the Earth, less than half believe that humans evolved from earlier animals, 40% believe that humans “probably” or “certainly” existed at the same time as dinosaurs, etc.), this felt a bit like preaching to the choir: nothing in this book seems designed to capture hearts or change minds. I am totally open to being shown the way forward, but I failed to find a pathway here. If regret is the ghost of the past, for me, extinction is the ghost of the future. Now my worry is less about leaving than of what will be left. I hate the feeling. And yet that turning outward of fear may be the only thing of true value that I’ve ever learned. I didn’t get a chance to write a review immediately upon completion of this, and nearly a week later, it’s all wisping away from me; I know it won’t leave a permanent mark, but again, if another reader finds this perfectly engaging, I wouldn’t be surprised. This is like-not-love for me, so three stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 20, 2023
|
Nov 22, 2023
|
Nov 20, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0063252015
| 9780063252011
| 0063252015
| 4.49
| 541,126
| Oct 18, 2022
| Oct 18, 2022
|
liked it
| Advice to anybody with the plan of naming your kid Junior: going through life as mini-you will be as thrilling as finding dried-up jizz on the carp Advice to anybody with the plan of naming your kid Junior: going through life as mini-you will be as thrilling as finding dried-up jizz on the carpet. But having a famous Ghost Dad puts a different light on it, and I can’t say I hated being noticed in that way. Around the same time Maggot started his shoplifting experiments, I was starting to get known as Demon Copperhead. You can’t deny, it’s got a power to it. I see plenty of reviewers saying, “I loved The Poisonwood Bible when I read it twenty years ago, haven’t really liked anything by Barbara Kingsolver since, but since Demon Copperhead won the Pulitzer Prize I thought I’d give it a chance…”, and that was exactly my experience. From there, other reviewers are either delighted or disappointed by this novel, and I have to say: I’m leaning more towards disappointment. This does start out strong: I was enchanted by young Damon/Demon (apparently everyone in Appalachian Tennessee gets a crazy nickname), and you’d have to have a heart of coal to not be moved by the story of a young orphan as he’s bounced around an uncaring fostercare system, but as he grows older I was less moved; Demon tells us what’s happening without showing us what it’s like; it’s all grief with zero grit. Kingsolver also surrounds Demon with several sermonising/moralising characters — characters who make sure the reader draws a line between what’s happening on the ground in Lee County and the forces (political, Big Pharma, sociological) at play behind the scenes — and frankly, that felt a little condescending; I can make those connections myself. Also: Demon mentions several times that he’s “Melungeon” (Appalachian mixed race; a term historically considered a slur), and although that term is never defined for us in the book, we know that he has darker-than-white skin, green eyes, and coppery hair — and although I did feel slightly uncomfortable for this older white woman to be writing from this perspective, race never once enters into the story; it seems like a strange and unnecessary choice. Kingsolver does have a way with turning a phrase — I admired many, many sentences — and if you can concentrate on just the plot, there is a lot of heart-tugging drama to carry a reader through this long book, but I was not blown away by the overall effort. Middling three stars, and I doubt I’ll read Kingsolver again. What’s an oxy, I’d asked. That November it was still a shiny new thing. OxyContin, God’s gift for the laid-off deep-hole man with his back and neck bones grinding like bags of gravel. For the bent-over lady pulling double shifts at Dollar General with her shot knees and ADHD grandkids to raise by herself. For every football player with some of this or that torn up, and the whole world riding on his getting back in the game. This was our deliverance. The tree was shaken and yes, we did eat of the apple. It’s no spoiler to note that Kingsolver wrote this as a modern retelling of Charles Dickens’ David Copperfield, and there are certainly important correlations that can be made between the uncaring state in Victorian England and “institutional poverty and its damages to children” in modern day southern Appalachia. (You may or may not like the irony of Demon commenting on reading Dickens in school, “seriously old guy, dead and a foreigner, but Christ Jesus did he get the picture on kids and orphans getting screwed over and nobody giving a rat’s ass. You’d think he was from around here.” And although I haven’t read Copperfield it did delight me when I realised that the character of U-Haul Pyles must correspond to the notorious Uriah Heep; I am sure that there are countless such correspondences that I did not recognise.) And as Kingsolver is from Appalachia herself, it makes perfect sense that she would set her novel at the dawn of the “shiny new” pain reliever, OxyContin, that seemed tailor-made for the local labouring population. As one of the secondary sermonising characters had taught Demon: What the companies did, he told us, was put the shutthole on any choice other than going into the mines. Not just here, also in Buchanan, Tazewell, all of eastern Kentucky, these counties got bought up whole: land, hospitals, courthouses, schools, company owned. Nobody needed to get all that educated for being a miner, so they let the schools go to rot. And they made sure no mills or factories got in the door. Coal only. To this day, you have to cross a lot of ground to find other work. Not an accident, Mr. Armstrong said, and for once, we believed him, because down in the dark mess of our little skull closets some puzzle pieces were clicking together and our world made some terrible kind of sense. The dads at home drinking beer in their underwear, the moms at the grocery with their SNAP coupons. The army recruiters in shiny gold buttons come to harvest their jackpot of hopeless futures. Goddamn. As for Demon’s story: his father died before he was born and his mom ODs when he’s ten, sending him into a variety of foster homes (awful, middling, and ideal), until a football injury sidelines his progress and, apparently, his whole future. There is misery piled upon misery — good and bad people, but no one ever really looking out for the orphan in their midst (which I reckon must be how Dickens told it?) — but even when some truly horrific events happen, Kingsolver pulls back from really letting us experience them: we don’t see the tragedies, we just hear Demon’s reporting on them. I’ll put a further quibble behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[I haven’t read David Copperfield but I have read Great Expectations, so when it says that Demon’s mom’s social security would be going into trust for him — and that his grandmother would look into setting up a trust for his dad’s, too — and that Demon was looking forward to getting revenge on Stoner some day, I was sure that Stoner would come out of the woodwork as Demon turned 18 to try and steal his money and that Demon would either replay the scene of helplessness with the strung out prostitute who stole his money as a kid, or finally get some redemption for that by thwarting Stoner (and hopefully get more revenge on him than that). But neither the money or Stoner comes up again. Which is not only disappointing, but weird. (hide spoiler)] I do think that this retelling was clever and important in concept, but as a literary experience, I didn’t feel like Kingsolver pulled it off. Not my cup of tea. Countless good passages, though: Live long enough, and all the things you ever loved can turn around to scorch you blind. The wonder is that you could start life with nothing, end with nothing, and lose so much in between. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
Nov 20, 2023
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1538181363
| 9781538181362
| 1538181363
| 3.65
| 139
| Aug 04, 2011
| Feb 06, 2024
|
really liked it
| In the wake of the high-profile trial came even more quixotic, conspiratorial, and occasionally ridiculous interpretations of the theft. When reali In the wake of the high-profile trial came even more quixotic, conspiratorial, and occasionally ridiculous interpretations of the theft. When reality proves either insufficiently romantic, or appears to cloud over some darker truth, the public, and particularly overenthusiastic journalists, tend to add spice to the pot. The Thefts of the Mona Lisa was originally released in 2011 to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the theft of “the world’s most famous painting” in 1911. I’ve read an advanced copy of a rerelease (slated to drop in early 2024), and while author Noah Charney does include recent scholarship concerning the painting (in particular, Pascal Cotte’s LAM scans that seem to reveal hidden versions of the painting beneath the one we all recognise), his basic thesis is much the same: Ever since the Mona Lisa was famously stolen from the Louvre by Italian nationalist Vincenzo Peruggia (who erroneously believed that the painting had been looted from his home country by Napoleon), conspiracy theorists have suggested that what was returned to France in 1913 was a fake or a copy — or maybe the Nazis stole the painting during WWII and it was then that the French government decided to start displaying a fake — and it is to correct the “fake news” crowd that Charney outlines the known and verifiable history of the work. People looking for a scholarly treatment of this story should note that in an afterword, Charney writes: This book is conversationally written and meant to replicate my lectures. And it really does have a conversational/casual tone that sometimes jars with folksy vernacular. He also notes that since he relied heavily on books that he considers to be the best researched works on the history of Leonardo da Vinci and the Mona Lisa, he doesn't feel the need to quote primary sources here (directing the reader to investigate the footnotes of those books he references). Still: This is a fascinating story, well presented, and I’m happy to have read it. Probably a 3.5 stars read; happy to round up. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) It would have been all but impossible to “shop” the Mona Lisa and find a buyer. It was simply too famous. That left a number of possibilities that various newspapers put forward: first, theft by a lunatic, who had no particular motivation; second, theft on commission by a criminal collector; third, theft as practical joke, perhaps by a journalist looking for a scoop; fourth, theft by a political group hoping to blackmail the French government; and the most bizarre of all, fifth, theft to sell forgeries to unsuspecting criminal art collectors. What seemed to occur to no one was the real motivation: an ideologically driven theft to repatriate the painting to Italy. The man who did steal the Mona Lisa in 1911, Vincenzo Peruggia, was no criminal mastermind: Tired of being treated like a hick foreigner, Peruggia was a tradesman who emigrated to Paris as a teenager, and when he got a job at the Louvre, he recognised how easy it would be to remove and repatriate the great Italian portrait to his home country. Charney explains how lax the security was at the Louvre at the time, outlines the amateur moves of the thief, and details the hapless response of the Parisian police force. It was fascinating for the author to tie in the suspicion that fell on Pablo Picasso (who apparently had commissioned the theft of some ancient Iberian sculptures from the Louvre, revealed around the same time, which would heavily influence his painting), and Charney eventually shares everything that is known of da Vinci’s life and work (he spent much more time as a military engineer than as an artist). I appreciated that Charney explains that there were many inconsistencies in Peruggia’s story (which feeds into conspiracy theories), as well as explaining the inconsistencies around the French government’s tracking of the Mona Lisa during WWII (which really feeds the conspiracy theories), but even the officials from Florence’s Uffizi Museum (to whom Peruggia wanted to give the Mona Lisa after two years of unsuspected possession) had detailed photographs that showed the characteristic “craquelure” (cracks in the paint) present in the surface of the Mona Lisa, and good enough for them seems good enough to me. Beyond proving that the original Mona Lisa is hanging in the Louvre today, Charney seems to have a secondary purpose in debunking the popular culture image of an art thief as some Thomas Crown/Dr. No gentleman-thief collector of fine art. As he writes, “every year anywhere from fifty thousand to one hundred thousand art objects (20 -30 000 in Italy alone) are reported stolen worldwide”, and this is mostly by criminal gangs and terrorist organisations (Art crime is ranked behind only drug and arms in terms of its value as an international criminal trade commodity. When planning the 9/ 11 attacks, Mohammed Atta tried first to buy a plane by selling looted Afghani antiquities in Germany.) And there’s something philosophically interesting about countless artworks going missing every year to fund criminal activity while the general public only worries about the few works that have made an impression on popular culture: and from Nat King Cole crooning soulfully about his Mona Lisa to Dan Brown’s potboiler (in which he egregiously writes that the Mona Lisa is painted on canvas instead of a poplar panel), no other painting seems to have made this much of an impression on our collective psyches. So, there is only one Mona Lisa by Leonardo. It is on display at the Louvre. The truth behind it is plenty intriguing, including real, demonstrable secrets hidden beneath its surface — there’s no need to buy into the ooga-booga conspiracy theories. I have been lucky enough to stand before the glass-encased Mona Lisa at the Louvre twice — once at 18 and once at 50 — and both times, I was stricken in her presence. What I saw was masterful and captivating, and if it ever turned out that what I saw was a fake or a copy, I don’t know if that would downgrade the experience in my memories. Even so: Charney — who is the expert in this — reassures me that there’s no reason to doubt the provenance of this incredible portrait. I am happy to have read this account of its fascinating history (even if some of the “ooga-booga” writing didn’t delight me). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 13, 2023
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1324036923
| 9781324036920
| 1324036923
| 3.74
| 38
| unknown
| Nov 14, 2023
|
it was amazing
| Once upon a time, humans lived with much less interpersonal violence, without harsh patriarchal domination of women, and without systemic social in Once upon a time, humans lived with much less interpersonal violence, without harsh patriarchal domination of women, and without systemic social inequities in general. Life wasn’t easy, but social exploitation and inequity figured much less than in later, civilized societies. That is the “Eden” of this book’s title. Our penchant for regular, organized interpersonal violence, the real worm in this apple, started after Eden, when we settled down, and our populations grew much larger. After Eden: A Short History of the World is exactly the sort of thing I like: A thoroughly accessible trip through human history, reframing the events I was aware of through the added context of those things I had not known or considered. For example: I had heard before of Spaniards working conquered indigenous people of the Americas to death in silver mines, but I never knew that that was to satisfy Ming China’s need for portable currency in their booming domestic economy; Europe wanted silks and porcelain, but the only thing China wanted in return was silver (until, eventually, England appeared in Chinese ports with their war ships and said, “We don’t care for this trade deficit, old chaps, so we’re going to have to insist you start buying this opium we’re growing in India.”) Author (and professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) John Charles Chasteen makes countless such connections in this book, illustrating how farms led to cities and empires, and eventually, the global market economy of a handful of winners and billions of losers that we see today. Chasteen proves that there is nothing natural or inevitable about the systems we have in place today, making the incredibly urgent point that only by understanding human history can we see a different path forward: one that prioritises the well-being of everyone and the planet we live on. So whether one is interested in seeing a different way forward or simply reading a holistic story of our shared past, After Eden is stuffed with fascinating information, and I loved it all. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) What spark of genius prompted the world’s first civilizations? Seemingly, none. Little about them suggests a higher form of human life. Essentially, there occurred a confluence and concentration of earlier innovations. Only the aggregate itself was strictly new. Pottery and basketry, woven and dyed clothing, horses and carts, oxen and plows, beer and bread, oil and wine, kingship and state religion — these came together with synergy in urban life. Urban environments exacerbated social inequality but also unleashed cultural dynamism. I think it would be impossible to summarise what is already a “short history of the world”, but I do want to note some things that I found particularly fascinating/eye-opening. I don’t think I have ever before read that what we call the Agricultural Revolution was a 10 000 year-long “diffuse and accidental” process (No one who lived during this “revolution” experienced rapid change because of it, or even knew that it was happening.) And I've never really considered that from the long ago days of the Persian Empire through the Roman and Ottoman and British, empires formed “the basic model of civilization until only two hundred years ago. It comprises most of what we usually regard as world history.” And this notion of “empire” is primarily what Chasteen is writing about here: stratified, warrior-led, focused on cities but predominantly rural, and founded on the productive power of downtrodden agricultural peasantries. Basically: Everywhere a rolling war machine discovered settled foreigners, they defeated their warriors and said, “You work for us now. Keep on farming and send a portion to our king.” But where the rolling war machine discovered foragers (a way of life no less organised, specialised, or culturally significant than what went on in settlements), the empire-builders would appropriate the land, enslave, scare off, or kill the locals, and feel good about spreading “civilisation” to the dark reaches of the earth. I see that Chasteen has written several histories of Latin America, and from what he shares here, I would be very interested in reading more on the history of Brazil: From its accidental “discovery” by Portuguese sailors who were blown off course of the weird Atlantic “gyre” that they would employ to slingshot themselves around the southern end of Africa en route to the Silk and Spice Roads, to its transformation into the largest plantation state in the Americas (overseen, again, by the Portuguese — who, it turns out, were the biggest players in the transatlantic slave trade, enslaving half of all people stolen from Africa on their Brazilian sugar and coffee farms), to its more recent history of independence, and flirtations with socialism, monarchy, and military rule (usually with American interference trying to get their preferred guy in). I have also never read or considered that the Industrial Revolution was initially a very localised event — centred in Northwest England and spreading barely into Scotland (due to the availability of coal, iron, and existing export infrastructure) — and was only copied abroad in Germany, slightly in Belgium and the Netherlands, and overseas, in New England. And it was the Industrial Revolution — and its need to open up new markets — that saw the spread of new empires: England colonised India not just for the resources, but to end their home-spun cotton industry and force the huge Indian market to buy British-made textiles. (This was also the point at which England outlawed slavery because, as Chasteen writes, As British industries saturated market after market in the Americas, slavery had begun to limit profits rather than guarantee them. Free workers would presumably consume more British imports.) Meanwhile, the United States built the Panama Canal in order to open up the Pacific market (“freeing” and then occupying the Philippines; sailing into Japanese ports to insist they join global markets [an idea they took to gladly as the Japanese then built their own warships and spread their own empire into Korea and China]), and as for continental Europe, this initiated the “Scramble for Africa” as newly industrialised Germany and Belgium attempted to spread empires of their own in the “Dark Continent”. (It’s no coincidence that thwarted empires at this stage led to German and Japanese aggression in the ensuing world wars.) Random interesting facts: • Many empires employed court eunuchs, but they have never been found in a culture that didn’t descend from herders • “Homer”, “Confucius”, and the “Buddha” may all be collective creations, where one name stands in for an entire oral tradition • Swahili was a lingua franca for East African traders, combining Bantu grammatical structures with Arabic vocabulary (and maybe everyone knows that, but it was interesting news to me). • While bombing North Vietnamese cities, the Americans “used more tonnage than all of World War II’s myriad bombing campaigns put together yet failed to defeat the Vietnamese revolutionaries” • And a line I admired: Voilà, World War One. Imperialism set it up, nationalism triggered it, industrialism made in hell on Earth. An enormous part of world history is the raw mistreatment of half of humanity by the other half. Obviously, making common cause with the whole world is going to be hard, but we have to try. What if we teach that all our fates are absolutely intertwined, that no Earthling is an outsider on this blue marble floating in the limitless void, that we do share a common history, and a common destiny, too? And, of course, this is the point of reading (and writing) a book like After Eden: Humans made society work the way it does today, and we have the ability to change it. The first step is to look back along the path we’ve made and see where we’ve gone wrong; I wish that history read like this in school. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 04, 2023
|
Nov 10, 2023
|
Nov 04, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
196019030X
| 9781960190307
| 196019030X
| unknown
| 4.25
| 57
| unknown
| Oct 03, 2023
|
liked it
| I only knew that I was drowning. By the time I realized what was happening to me, I was already fully submerged in treacherous ocean water, riding I only knew that I was drowning. By the time I realized what was happening to me, I was already fully submerged in treacherous ocean water, riding the current. And no matter how hard I kicked back at the rolling tide, I seemed no closer to its surface. I was tossed and battered and crushed by every folding wave, my body a knot, tangled, in every direction. I opened my mouth to scream, an involuntary compulsion brought on by fear, but water forced the words back down my throat. It was cold and dark and the only end in sight was my own. I had a lot of driving to do yesterday, and as it was the day before Halloween, I decided to listen to a horror novel on audiobook. I chose Twelve Residents Dreaming because it fit the bill, and although I later learned that this is the seventh and final volume in author William Pauley III’s “Bedlam Bible” (an author and series I haven’t read before), it totally stands on its own. In brief: Anacoy Marlin finds himself shipwrecked, and just as he is about to succumb to drowning, he discovers a raft that brings him to a mysterious skyscraper in the middle of the “bell dark sea”. There, he finds the remains of twelve former residents of the building, and as he accesses their memories (or are they dreams?), the reader is treated to twelve weird and horrific short stories. There is a huge range of fantastical experiences described — smouldering children and bad blood and a mental time machine — and throughout, it’s the building itself (known as the Eighth Block) that poses the greatest danger to hapless visitors. This was perfectly suited to my needs for the day, so I don’t want to pick apart the writing (beyond noting frequent use of cliches; every noun has an adjective, every action is described adverbly), and will simply say that this was dark and inventive and passed the time pleasantly. (Note: I listened to an audio ARC through NetGalley and needed to transcribe my quotes; apologies for mistakes, they are meant for flavour only.) This is madness. Pure madness, I thought. Then unconsciously gripped one of the skulls at its eye sockets as one would do with, say, a bowling ball, and as soon as my fingers slid inside, a barrage of bright images flickered in my thoughts. Telepathic messages straight from the hollowness of the skull. The quick flashes of light startled me, causing my hand to retract and the light to instantly fade. Was this dead relic communicating with me? Nonsense, I thought. But despite thinking it to be nonsense, I once again pushed my fingers as far back into the sockets as they’d go. The flashes of light returned, but that time I was able to make out clear images inside my head, as if they were flickering onto the wall of my closed eyelids. They were displays of memories, or perhaps dreams, I hardly knew the difference. And each skull had its own story to tell. I did like the way that there’s a progression of flooding in the stories: Early stories mention torrential rainstorms in the city’s south side, and then localised flooding around the Eighth Block, rain pouring inside the windows, until whole floors are flooded; something leads to this building standing alone in that bell dark sea (I did like that phrase). I also liked the way that stories sometimes intertwined (especially that of the tattooed man, the mysterious blue flowers, hallways full of salt, and the discovery of the camera). These stories aren’t super spooky, but they have a definite Twilight Zone vibe, and as a collection, they compose an epic tale across time and space. I’m glad I chose this collection to fill my hours and I am grateful for the early access. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 30, 2023
|
Oct 30, 2023
|
Oct 31, 2023
|
Audiobook
| ||||||||||||||
1772126284
| 9781772126280
| 1772126284
| 3.78
| 158
| unknown
| Oct 01, 2022
|
liked it
| We’ve never lived on earth. I point this out to him as the bus veers up the street. In the world we’re creating together, no animals exist, no seasons We’ve never lived on earth. I point this out to him as the bus veers up the street. In the world we’re creating together, no animals exist, no seasons either. We live eight storeys up and never touch soil. We follow highways not rivers. We name our heat waves after our grandmothers. We pretend our pain is weather. We dream of houses we’ll never own. Of second homes, seventy minutes out of the city. Of well-lit rooms and comfortable chairs, of gardens, but never children. ~We Have Never Lived on Earth Longlisted for the 2023 Giller Prize, We Have Never Lived on Earth is a series of related short stories that add up to something like a novel. Mostly told from the POV of Charlotte — the older of two girls brought from South Africa to the interior of British Columbia by their newly single mother, their dad having been left behind — these stories start off pretty slowly (mostly straightforward [what reads as autofictional] tales of an immigrant childhood), but as they go along, some of the later stories are more abstract and literary. These do add up to something all together, but as short stories (apparently, mostly previously published elsewhere), I’m left thinking they wouldn’t be very satisfying individually. Probably three and a half stars overall, not leaning towards rounding up. Lukas said that he imagined that the moon would be a lot like Antarctica, a place he planned to travel to. It would be remote and cold, but life was certainly possible with the right equipment. If I lived there, on the moon, he meant, he promised to visit. Only if I invite you, I said. ~How to be Silent in German After the upheaval of immigrating and a fractious teenaged relationship with her mother, Charlotte’s stories are mostly about leaving home and travelling around the world: working and writing in Germany and Crete and Amsterdam; writing a book on women artists because, as her partner Lukas accuses, she’s not brave enough to make her own art. I liked the one story from Charlotte’s father’s POV (set just after his separation from his wife and just as he learns she plans to take his kids away to Canada), and I liked the final story with a later in life visit between Charlotte and her mom, but some of the early stories set in small town B.C. were less interesting. Even the writing early on didn’t seem promising, as in House on Carbonate, about Charlotte meeting the boy with whom she’ll have her first kiss: Kent and his friends Jake and Roy joined us and we continued south together, like the monarchs, finding security in numbers. We stopped at the 7-Eleven to buy Fuzzy Peaches and Twizzlers, which allowed me to get a better look at Kent. He was tall and thin in the effortless way of adolescent boys and supermodels. Though — Lucia often reminded me — supermodels live on diets of Coke Zero and iceberg lettuce to maintain their birdbath collarbones; teenage boys do not. His thick hair slid over his eyes making my aorta cancel all blood circulation to my head. If the immaturity of that voice is meant to reflect Charlotte’s age at the time, it really only works as a part of this collection, where you can watch the character grow and change; on its own, it felt unaccomplished; I was never unaware I was reading a collection of short stories and considering them individually. In a later story, Cellular Memory, Charlotte makes reference to many details that occur over the course of this collection: What have you lost? And it’s the callback details in these later stories that make this feel something like a novel, but again, I think only a few of the stories really stand on their own. I found that distracting, and in the end, while this does add up to the story of one woman's rootless life, there's neither anything particularly personal shared about her experiences or anything universal to be learned from her (so what's the point?). Good, not great. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 29, 2023
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Oct 29, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
3.77
| 4,802
| Apr 20, 2023
| unknown
|
liked it
| The currach’s skeleton of sally and hazel rods is in the middle of the workshop floor and it really does look alive, and the centre laths makes it The currach’s skeleton of sally and hazel rods is in the middle of the workshop floor and it really does look alive, and the centre laths makes it look like a boat now, I will admit this, and I admit to feelings of excitement just looking at it, maybe a mixture of nerves and excitement, which are perhaps the same thing, and the vast expanse, all the huge space its frame is taking up, My favourite quote from author Elaine Feeney’s interview on the Booker website is: As for my fiction – I write what I know – and then I tell lies. In this spirit, How to Build a Boat is based on Feeney’s real life experience — of living in the west of Ireland during turbulent socio-political times, of having taught in an all-boys’ school, of raising a child with unique abilities (as per that interview: hyperlexia) — and as she has worked primarily as a poet, the best bits of her writing here represent a poetic insight into the human condition as well as a poet’s precision of language (I realise that I’ve chosen quotes that all have poetic line breaks, but it really doesn’t happen all that often). Yet: I don’t know if these disparate bits add up to a totally satisfying novel. The plotline (and its moral) was fairly predictable, I was not moved by the characters’ predicaments, and often, I found that Feeney was using this space as a soapbox (which I understand is what every novelist is ultimately doing, but there was little subtlety to it). This was a fine read, probably three and a half stars, but I’m not moved to round up. The cathedral bell rang out fast. As the novel opens, we learn that Jamie is being raised by single dad, Eoin — Jamie’s mother having died in childbirth when his parents were still teenagers — and as Jamie is neurodivergent in some way (from the interview: Feeney refuses to categorise his condition, “the not labelling was an important consideration”), Eoin has always been indulgent and overprotective, but now needs to relinquish some control as Jamie starts secondary school at the local all-boys Catholic college. Jamie is immediately bullied and overwhelmed, but is rescued by his English teacher, Tess — who had provided extra support for special needs students until that program was suddenly cut — and although Tess is under immense pressure in her home life, she has the knowledge and inclination to take a kid in need under her wing. Eventually, Jamie catches the attention of the new woodworking teacher, Tadhg, and with a kind of outsider, folksy wisdom, Tadgh recognises that the boy would benefit from redirecting his obsessive energies into working methodically with his hands. And when Tadgh learns that the math-minded boy dreams of building a perpetual motion machine (that in some quasi-mystical way would connect him with the mother he never knew), Tadgh directs Jamie in the building of a traditional Irish boat (a “currach”) that invokes the ancient concept of “meitheal” (communal effort: many others will join in on the building of this boat, and Jamie will ultimately find a place in the community). POV rotates between Jamie and Tess — with Tadgh serving as the link between their stories — and despite some barely developed background characters attempting to thwart their efforts (while demonstrating all that’s wrong in modern Irish society), the lives of these three were nicely developed. Stood there, Tess thought about Tadhg walking out to the Forge, alone, about Jamie and his machine, about how fulfilled she was being among them and how naively Jamie was hoping, the bright hope he had, that the energy, wherever it would manifest from, would be enough to connect everyone, the living and the dead. But there was nothing for the half-living, Tess thought — There were many things that I didn’t understand in this story: Why was it set from autumn of 2019 to spring of 2020 without any mention of the pandemic? Why would there be an implication that a student shouldn’t be left unchaperoned with the bombastically misogynistic President of the college if nothing ever comes of that? Why would this same President (who warns boys not to work on the boat, because working with one’s hands is “common”) have hired a woodworking teacher in the first place? Why did every main character have to have been raised by a single parent? On the other hand: I did like the experience of being inside Jamie’s and Tess’ heads; these are interesting and complicated characters navigating difficult lives — lives made more difficult by their own decisions and behaviour — and the characters (if not the plot) are worth the read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 24, 2023
|
Oct 28, 2023
|
Oct 24, 2023
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
1009411381
| 9781009411387
| 1009411381
| 2.00
| 2
| unknown
| Feb 29, 2024
|
liked it
| In many ways, the Aeneid tells a tale of change and transformation, propelled by the inscrutable forces of fate towards a preordained telos (end) — th In many ways, the Aeneid tells a tale of change and transformation, propelled by the inscrutable forces of fate towards a preordained telos (end) — the foundation of Rome. This is a world in which opposing forces ultimately cancel each other out or supplement each other to constitute a newly unified whole. The Trojan horse is central to this endeavour. It represents both Greek ingenuity and Greek deceit, the end of the story of one city and the beginning of another, and human, divine, and animal identities. Above all, however, Virgil includes it as part of a narrative in which Sinon’s false story matches the concealed human contents of the horse to form a compelling strategy by which the Greeks trick their way into the city. And yet, unlike his Greek counterparts, Aeneas, the hero of Virgil’s Aeneid, cannot boast about having been one of the fighters hidden in the horse. His humanity emerges when he flees the horse’s deadly human cargo — and turns a story of destruction into a story of a new beginning. Author Julia Kindt is a Professor of Ancient History at the University of Sydney (among other roles and distinctions), and in her Preface to The Trojan Horse and Other Stories she writes that this is meant to be an examination of animal-based stories from antiquity as “part of a larger endeavour to reveal some of the foundations on which Western humanism rests”, and with the “general reader” in mind. And as interesting as that sounded to me, this general reader didn’t get much out of this. Each chapter read like one of my university essays — an introduction that sums up what is to come, a body that contains many ideas and supporting references, followed by a summarising conclusion — and while the information wasn’t over my head, this felt too academically-formatted to satisfy my general-interest curiosity, and too basic to satisfy an academic audience. There were fewer classical animal stories than I expected, and despite the circling and summarising and drawing together of disparate threads, I never really understood the overall thesis here. I was often bored. I appreciate the effort and expertise that went into this, but it just wasn’t for me. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Humans, in their interactions with non-human creatures, continue to grapple with the ambiguity at the heart of the human condition: we are indeed animals, but animals that like to think of ourselves as different. The resulting paradoxes haunt us up to this day. They are fundamental to the human/ animal story as the medium perhaps best suited to explore the shifting ground of our humanity: between the wish to be different from all other creatures inhabiting this planet — and the ultimate realization that we are not. This (the paradox of humans knowing we’re animals but feeling separate from the animal kingdom) is what I anticipated the thesis to be, but despite going back several times to Aristotle and his argument that logos (reason or intellect) is what elevates humans above brute animals, Kindt doesn’t really make her case based on the animal stories she shares; and it was the animal stories I was here for. Even the Trojan Horse itself is discussed as merely a symbol (or synecdoche) of the long and brutal war — but despite examining the horse culture of the Trojans, the role of Athena in its construction, or how Virgil repurposed Ovid’s brief reference to the Trojan Horse in order to prove the “deceitfulness” of the Greeks, even this titular story didn’t serve the thesis to my satisfaction; it circled and circled without drawing a picture. There were several bits that did intrigue me throughout, as in this aside found within the discussion of the famous tale of Androclus removing a thorn from a lion’s paw: Greek and Roman literature holds plenty of examples in which animals are used to act as a mouthpiece and channels of communication for the oppressed. The ‘father’ of the fable, Aesop, was himself a slave and some of the tales attributed to him (and other ancient authors) used this genre as a form of social critique. In other words, the oppression of certain animals serves as a means to address the oppression of certain humans. In this way, the story anticipates a more recent acknowledgement: that the oppression of women, people of colour, and animals shares the same roots by being grounded in the same conception of the human. On the other hand, there were whole chapters that held little interest for me — the fact that we have always thought of honeybees as monarchical (even if in antiquity they imagined a King bee ruling the drones); Socrates referring to himself as a gadfly at trial (and the link to modern day “goads” like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange) — and overall, I can’t say I learned much. Not for me. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 15, 2023
|
Oct 22, 2023
|
Oct 15, 2023
|
Hardcover
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.55
|
really liked it
|
Mar 20, 2023
not set
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
||||||
3.57
|
really liked it
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
||||||
3.58
|
really liked it
|
Dec 30, 2023
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
||||||
3.58
|
really liked it
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Dec 28, 2023
|
||||||
4.45
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 20, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
||||||
3.17
|
liked it
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
||||||
3.50
|
really liked it
|
Dec 17, 2023
|
Dec 18, 2023
|
||||||
3.90
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 14, 2023
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
||||||
4.52
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 08, 2023
|
Dec 07, 2023
|
||||||
4.12
|
really liked it
|
Dec 03, 2023
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
||||||
3.65
|
liked it
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
||||||
3.64
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 27, 2023
|
||||||
3.84
|
liked it
|
Nov 22, 2023
|
Nov 20, 2023
|
||||||
4.49
|
liked it
|
Nov 20, 2023
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
||||||
3.65
|
really liked it
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
Nov 14, 2023
|
||||||
3.74
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 10, 2023
|
Nov 04, 2023
|
||||||
4.25
|
liked it
|
Oct 30, 2023
|
Oct 31, 2023
|
||||||
3.78
|
liked it
|
Nov 02, 2023
|
Oct 29, 2023
|
||||||
3.77
|
liked it
|
Oct 28, 2023
|
Oct 24, 2023
|
||||||
2.00
|
liked it
|
Oct 22, 2023
|
Oct 15, 2023
|