Trends in illegal wildlife trade: Analyzing personal baggage seizure data in the Pacific Northwest
- PMID: 32520961
- PMCID: PMC7286499
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234197
Trends in illegal wildlife trade: Analyzing personal baggage seizure data in the Pacific Northwest
Abstract
The illegal import of wildlife and wildlife products is a growing concern, and the U.S. is one of the world's leading countries in the consumption and transit of illegal wildlife and their derivatives. Yet, few U.S. studies have analyzed the illegal wildlife trade (IWT) on a national or local scale. Moreover, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically examined the trends associated with IWT moving through personal baggage. This work aimed to better understand the magnitude of illegal wildlife importation into U.S. ports of entry by determining trends associated with illegal wildlife products from personal baggage seizures, using the Pacific Northwest (PNW) as a specific case study. To identify the most influential factors determining the numbers and types of personal baggage seizures into PNW, we analyzed 1,731 records between 1999 and 2016 from the Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS) database. We found five significant contributors: taxonomic classification of wildlife, categorical import date, wildlife product, source region, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) status. While wildlife seizures across taxonomic categories have generally decreased in the PNW since 2008, other findings provide a reason for concern. More specifically, mammals were identified as the largest animal group of seized wildlife, and temporal trends indicate increases in seizures for this and several other taxonomic groups. Many of the seizures originated from overseas, with East Asia serving as the largest source. Our PNW case study can be a model for how large-scale geographical seizure data can be used to inform about the major factors that have historically and presently contribute to IWT, with conservation implications globally.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Evaluating the reliability of media reports for gathering information about illegal wildlife trade seizures.PeerJ. 2022 Apr 5;10:e13156. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13156. eCollection 2022. PeerJ. 2022. PMID: 35402091 Free PMC article.
-
Gaps in global wildlife trade monitoring leave amphibians vulnerable.Elife. 2021 Aug 12;10:e70086. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70086. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34382939 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the legal, illegal, and gray ornamental trade of the critically endangered helmeted hornbill.Conserv Biol. 2024 Oct;38(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14358. Conserv Biol. 2024. PMID: 39248733
-
Wildlife crime in Australia.Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021 Sep 24;5(3):487-494. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20200288. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021. PMID: 33533406 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A synthesis of wild animal-related trade laws in some of the world's most biodiverse countries.J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120141. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120141. Epub 2024 Feb 13. J Environ Manage. 2024. PMID: 38354606 Review.
Cited by
-
Economic value of illegal wildlife trade entering the USA.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258523. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34637471 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CITES. CITES Secretariat welcomes UN General Assembly Resolution on tackling illicit trafficking in wildlife. 2015. July 30 [cited 10 December 2019]. In: CITES Press Releases; [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cites.org/eng/unga_resolution_wildlife_trafficking_150730
-
- Zimmerman ME. The black market for wildlife: combating transnational organized crime in the illegal wildlife trade. Vand J Transnat’l L. 2003;36:1657.
-
- Roe D. Trading nature: a report, with case studies, on the contribution of wildlife trade management to sustainable livelihoods and the Millennium Development Goals. Gland, Switzerland: TRAFFIC; 2007. [cited 2019 Dec 10]. Available from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9614
-
- Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the united states. BioScience. 1998. August;48(8):607–15.
-
- World Wildlife Fund. Living planet report 2016: Risk and resilience in new era [Internet]. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International; 2016. [cited 2019 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/living-planet-report-2016
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources