Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;223(3):423.e1-423.e15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.037. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

A new rapid bedside test to diagnose and monitor intraamniotic inflammation in preterm PROM using transcervically collected fluid

Affiliations

A new rapid bedside test to diagnose and monitor intraamniotic inflammation in preterm PROM using transcervically collected fluid

Kyung Joon Oh et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, a clinical condition present in approximately 50% of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, is often associated with intraamniotic inflammation, a risk factor for a short admission-to-delivery interval, early preterm delivery, and neonatal complications. We previously developed a transcervical amniotic fluid collector, the device that allows the collection of fluid noninvasively from the cervical canal when membrane rupture occurs.

Objective: This study was designed to determine whether rapid analysis of an interleukin-8 concentration in fluid obtained noninvasively by the transcervical amniotic fluid collector can be used to assess the risk of intraamniotic inflammation. We also compared the diagnostic performance of this point-of-care test for interleukin-8 in transcervically obtained fluid to that of a white blood cell count determined in amniotic fluid retrieved by transabdominal amniocentesis.

Study design: This prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2011 and April 2017. Fluid was retrieved through both transabdominal amniocentesis and the use of a transcervical amniotic fluid collector within 24 hours of amniocentesis in patients with a singleton pregnancy and preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (16-35 weeks of gestation). Amniotic fluid obtained via amniocentesis was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas; a white blood cell count was also measured in amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic infection was diagnosed when microorganisms were identified by the cultivation of amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL) assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Interleukin-8 in cervical fluid obtained by the collector was measured by the point-of-care test that used a test strip and scanner based on the fluorescence immunochromatographic analysis in 2019. The diagnostic indices, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the 2 different tests were calculated.

Results: First, interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL in cervical fluid, determined by the point-of-care test, was at the knee of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and had a sensitivity of 98% (56/57; 95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%), specificity of 74% (40/54; 95% confidence interval, 60-85%), positive predictive value of 80% (56/70; 95% confidence interval, 72-86%), negative predictive value of 98% (40/41; 95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%), positive likelihood ratio of 3.79 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-5.96), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.17) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation; a concentration of matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay had a prevalence of 51% (57/111). Second, a cervical fluid interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL had significantly higher sensitivity than a transabdominally obtained amniotic fluid white blood cell count (≥19 cells/mm3) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity: 98% [95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%] vs 84% [95% confidence interval, 72-93%]; P<.05; specificity: 74% [95% confidence interval, 60-85%] vs 76% [95% confidence interval, 62-87%); positive and negative predictive values: 80% [95% confidence interval, 72-86%] and 98% [95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%] vs 79% [95% confidence interval, 69-86%] and 82% [95% confidence interval, 71-89%]) and in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation/infection (gold standard: positive culture for bacteria or a matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL; sensitivity: 91% [95% confidence interval, 82-97%] vs 75% [95% confidence interval, 63-85%]; P<.05).

Conclusion: The point-of-care test was predictive of intraamniotic inflammation, based on the determination of interleukin-8 in fluid retrieved by a transcervical amniotic fluid collector. Therefore, the analysis of cervically obtained fluid by such point-of-care test may be used to noninvasively monitor intraamniotic inflammation in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

Keywords: MMP-8; biomarker; cervical fluid; chorioamnionitis; funisitis; interleukin-8; intraamniotic infection; point-of-care-test; prelabor rupture of membranes; transcervical amniotic fluid collector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

The test described in this article is the subject of a patent by the Seoul National University (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and by Obmed Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Dr. BH Yoon is listed as an inventor, developed two monoclonal antibodies to IL-8 used in this study, and has a financial interest in Obmed Co., Ltd. A financial interest is defined as a potential gain or potential loss derived from the activity of this company.

One author (Romero R) did not have any access or contact with patients, or any identifiable information.

The remaining authors have no interests or conflicts to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Transcervical amniotic fluid collector
The transcervical amniotic fluid collector is shown after ballooning: length 25 cm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Interleukin-8 concentration determined by the point-of-care test of fluid
Interleukin-8 concentration determined by the point-of-care test of fluid obtained with the transcervical collector device. (A) according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic inflammation (amniotic fluid MMP-8 >23 ng/ml) (median IL-8 concentration [interquartile range], 51.7 ng/mL [23.4–73.1 ng/mL] vs. 4.9 ng/mL [2.8–9.5 ng/mL], p<0.001); (B) according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic infection (a positive amniotic fluid culture for bacteria) (median IL-8 concentration [interquartile range], 51.4 ng/mL [15.7–69.6 ng/mL] vs. 7.8 ng/mL [3.3–24.1 ng/mL], p<0.001); and (C) according to the presence or absence of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation (median IL-8 concentration [interquartile range], 48.1 ng/mL [17.0–63.5 ng/mL] vs. 4.5 ng/mL [2.7–7.8 ng/mL], p<.001),
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Receiver operating characteristic curves
Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrating the performance of interleukin-8 concentration determined by the POCT of fluid obtained using the transcervical collector device. (A) in the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation (area under the curve, 0.949 [95% confidence interval, 0.890–0.982]; p<.0.001), and (B) in the identification of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (area under the curve, 0.914 [95% confidence interval, 0.845–0.958]; p<.001). AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Relationship between transcervical and transabdominal fluids
There was a significant relationship between the transcervically obtained fluid (stored fluid without centrifugation) interleukin-8 concentration determined by the point-of-care test and the concentration of transabdominally obtained amniotic fluid (stored supernatant after centrifugation) interleukin-8 determined by ELISA (p<.001, γ=0.681). IL, interleukin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(1):178–93. - PubMed
    1. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Hassan S, Erez O, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113 Suppl 3:17–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Epidemiology of preterm birth and its clinical subtypes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(12):773–82. - PubMed
    1. Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):164–75. - PubMed

Publication types