Skip to main page content

. 2020 Oct;228(2):420-426.

doi: 10.1111/nph.15974. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

Supposed Jurassic angiosperms lack pentamery, an important angiosperm-specific feature

Dmitry D Sokoloff¹, Margarita V Remizowa¹, Elena S El¹, Paula J Rudall², Richard M Bateman²

Affiliations

Affiliations

¹ Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
² Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK.

PMID: 31418869
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15974

Free article

Supposed Jurassic angiosperms lack pentamery, an important angiosperm-specific feature

Dmitry D Sokoloff et al. New Phytol. 2020 Oct.

Free article

. 2020 Oct;228(2):420-426.

doi: 10.1111/nph.15974. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

Authors

Dmitry D Sokoloff¹, Margarita V Remizowa¹, Elena S El¹, Paula J Rudall², Richard M Bateman²

Affiliations

¹ Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
² Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK.

PMID: 31418869
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15974

No abstract available

Keywords: Jurassic; angiosperms; evolution; flower; fossil; pentamery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Hunting the Snark: the flawed search for mythical Jurassic angiosperms.
Bateman RM. Bateman RM. J Exp Bot. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):22-35. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz411. J Exp Bot. 2020. PMID: 31538196 Review.
An unexpected noncarpellate epigynous flower from the Jurassic of China.
Fu Q, Diez JB, Pole M, García Ávila M, Liu ZJ, Chu H, Hou Y, Yin P, Zhang GQ, Du K, Wang X. Fu Q, et al. Elife. 2018 Dec 18;7:e38827. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38827. Elife. 2018. PMID: 30558712 Free PMC article.
Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap.
Li HT, Yi TS, Gao LM, Ma PF, Zhang T, Yang JB, Gitzendanner MA, Fritsch PW, Cai J, Luo Y, Wang H, van der Bank M, Zhang SD, Wang QF, Wang J, Zhang ZR, Fu CN, Yang J, Hollingsworth PM, Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Li DZ. Li HT, et al. Nat Plants. 2019 May;5(5):461-470. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0421-0. Epub 2019 May 6. Nat Plants. 2019. PMID: 31061536
Form, function and environments of the early angiosperms: merging extant phylogeny and ecophysiology with fossils.
Feild TS, Arens NC. Feild TS, et al. New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):383-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01333.x. New Phytol. 2005. PMID: 15819904 Review.
How deep is the conflict between molecular and fossil evidence on the age of angiosperms?
Coiro M, Doyle JA, Hilton J. Coiro M, et al. New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):83-99. doi: 10.1111/nph.15708. Epub 2019 Feb 26. New Phytol. 2019. PMID: 30681148 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Developmental Flower and Rhizome Morphology in Nuphar (Nymphaeales): An Interplay of Chaos and Stability.
El ES, Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD. El ES, et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 May 19;8:303. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00303. eCollection 2020. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020. PMID: 32509775 Free PMC article.
Model Species to Investigate the Origin of Flowers.
Scutt CP. Scutt CP. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2686:83-109. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3299-4_4. Methods Mol Biol. 2023. PMID: 37540355
New Fossil Evidence Suggests That Angiosperms Flourished in the Middle Jurassic.
Han L, Zhao Y, Zhao M, Sun J, Sun B, Wang X. Han L, et al. Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;13(3):819. doi: 10.3390/life13030819. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36983974 Free PMC article.
Fossil data support a pre-Cretaceous origin of flowering plants.
Silvestro D, Bacon CD, Ding W, Zhang Q, Donoghue PCJ, Antonelli A, Xing Y. Silvestro D, et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;5(4):449-457. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01387-8. Epub 2021 Jan 28. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 33510432
Pre-Carpels from the Middle Triassic of Spain.
Santos AA, Wang X. Santos AA, et al. Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;11(21):2833. doi: 10.3390/plants11212833. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36365286 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Barba-Montoya J, dos Reis M, Schneider H, Donoghue PCJ, Yang Z. 2018. Constraining uncertainty in the timescale of angiosperm evolution and the veracity of a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. New Phytologist 218: 819-834.
1. Bateman RM, Hilton J, Rudall PJ. 2006. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 3471-3503.
1. Chamberlain CJ. 1935. Gymnosperms: structure and evolution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
1. Coiro M, Doyle JA, Hilton J. 2019. How deep is the conflict between molecular and fossil evidence on the age of angiosperms? New Phytologist 223: 83-89.
1. Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S121-S153.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Wiley