Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 31;6(7):190638.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.190638. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Early animal evolution: a morphologist's view

Claus Nielsen  1
Affiliations
Review

Early animal evolution: a morphologist's view

Claus Nielsen. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

Two hypotheses for the early radiation of the metazoans are vividly discussed in recent phylogenomic studies, the 'Porifera-first' hypothesis, which places the poriferans as the sister group of all other metazoans, and the 'Ctenophora-first' hypothesis, which places the ctenophores as the sister group to all other metazoans. It has been suggested that an analysis of morphological characters (including specific molecules) could throw additional light on the controversy, and this is the aim of this paper. Both hypotheses imply independent evolution of nervous systems in Planulozoa and Ctenophora. The Porifera-first hypothesis implies no homoplasies or losses of major characters. The Ctenophora-first hypothesis shows no important synapomorphies of Porifera, Planulozoa and Placozoa. It implies either independent evolution, in Planulozoa and Ctenophora, of a new digestive system with a gut with extracellular digestion, which enables feeding on larger organisms, or the subsequent loss of this new gut in the Poriferans (and the re-evolution of the collar complex). The major losses implied in the Ctenophora-first theory show absolutely no adaptational advantages. Thus, morphology gives very strong support for the Porifera-first hypothesis.

Keywords: animalia; large molecules; morphology; ultrastructure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Early animal phylogeny according to the Porifera hypothesis with an indication of gains of important characters. Neurotransmitters A and B, see the text.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Early animal evolution according to the Ctenophora hypothesis (based on homoplasies), with an indication of gains of important characters. Homoplasies are in red.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Early animal evolution according to the Ctenophora hypothesis (based on losses), with an indication of losses of important characters. Losses are in blue.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. 2 Vols Berlin, Germany: Georg Reimer.
    1. Ryan JF, et al. 2013. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342, 1242592 (10.1126/science.1242592) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moroz LL, et al. 2014. The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature 510, 109–114. (10.1038/nature13400) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen X-X, Hittinger CT, Rokas A. 2017. Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0126 (10.1038/s41559-017-0126) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whelan NV, Kocot KM, Moroz TP, Mukherjee K, Williams P, Paulay G, Moroz LL, Halanych KM. 2017. Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1737–1746. (10.1038/s41559-017-0331-3) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources