Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug 15:12:121.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-121.

A pilot placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized study on the cognition-enhancing benefits of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient in healthy subjects

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A pilot placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized study on the cognition-enhancing benefits of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient in healthy subjects

Zain M Azhar et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: It has long been postulated that the relative abundance of specific nutrients can affect cognitive processes and emotions. Newly described influences of dietary factors on neuronal function and synaptic plasticity have revealed some of the vital mechanisms that could be responsible for the action of diet on brain health and cognitive function. Here, through a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we asked if the newly discovered chicken meat ingredient-168 (CMI-168) could be beneficial to the cognitive function in healthy adults.

Methods: Normal, healthy subjects were supplemented with either placebo or CMI-168 for 6 weeks. The subjects were given a series of cognitive tests to examine their levels of cognitive functioning at the beginning and end of supplementation, as well as two weeks after termination of supplementation. The combination of these tests, namely Digit Span Backwards, Letter-Number Sequencing, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), was used to assess the subjects' attention and working memory. For all comparisons, the probability level of p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant using repeated measure 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test.

Results: Overall, subjects supplemented with CMI-168 showed significantly (p < 0.01) better performance in all cognitive tests after 6 weeks' supplementation compared to control and such superior performance was maintained even 2 weeks after termination of supplementation.

Conclusions: The present study reveals the cognition-enhancing properties of a recently developed chicken meat ingredient, likely arising from the promotion of attention and prefrontal cortex functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient-168 (CMI-168) on working memory as examined by (A) Digit Span Backwards, DS-B; and (B) Letter-Number Sequencing, LNS. Each data point is represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared with placebo group at the same time point.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient-168 (CMI-168) on verbal memory and learning as examined by RAVLT. New verbal learning scores were reflected by (A) Immediate Learning, IL; (B) Best Learning, BL; and (C) Total Learning, TL. Each data point is represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). *** p < 0.001, compared with placebo group at the same time point.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient-168 (CMI-168) on verbal memory and learning as examined by RAVLT. Susceptibility to interference was determined by (A) Proactive Interference, PI; and (B) Retroactive Interference, RI. Please refer to Methods for detailed description of the assessments. Each data point is represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). *** p < 0.001, compared with placebo group at the same time point.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of a proprietary chicken meat ingredient (CMI) on verbal memory and learning as examined by RAVLT. Memory retention and recognition were determined by (A) Delayed Recall, DR; and (B) Recall, R respectively. Each data point is represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). *** p < 0.001, compared with placebo group at the same time point.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beddington J, Cooper CL, Field J, Goswami U, Huppert FA, Jenkins R, Jones HS, Kirkwood TB, Sahakian BJ, Thomas SM. The mental wealth of nations. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1057–1060. doi: 10.1038/4551057a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mora F, Segovia G, Del Arco A, de Blas M, Garrido P. Stress, neurotransmitters, corticosterone and body-brain integration. Brain Res. 2012;1476:71–85. - PubMed
    1. Hibberd C, Yau JL, Seckl JR. Glucocorticoids and the ageing hippocampus. J Anat. 2000;197(Pt 4):553–562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boot BP, Partridge B, Hall W. Better evidence for safety and efficacy is needed before neurologists prescribe drugs for neuroenhancement to healthy people. Neurocase. 2012;18(3):181–184. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.588174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu A, Ying Z, Gomez-Pinilla F. Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation restores mechanisms that maintain brain homeostasis in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(10):1587–1595. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0313. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms