Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 23812469
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318292766b
Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the risk of stillbirth in apparently uncomplicated monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies by systematic review and meta-analysis and compare it with that in uncomplicated dichorionic pregnancies.
Data sources: We performed an electronic search (January 1985 to April 2012) of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases.
Methods of study selection: Studies detailing gestational-age specific stillbirth rates after 24 weeks of gestation in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies uncomplicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome, growth restriction, or major anomalies. The rate and risk of stillbirth were calculated in 2-week gestational age blocks and compared in controlled studies with dichorionic pregnancies.
Tabulation, integration, and results: We evaluated 361 studies to include nine informative studies, four after additional data from the investigators. The rate of stillbirth per 1,000 uncomplicated monochorionic-diamniotic pregnancies at 32-33, 34-35, and 36-37 weeks of gestation was 5.1, 6.8, and 6.2, respectively. The risk of stillbirth per pregnancy at 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation was 1.6%, 1.3% and 0.9%, respectively. Compared with uncomplicated dichorionic pregnancies, the odds ratio for stillbirth per pregnancy at 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation was 4.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-12.6), 3.7 (CI 1.1-12.0), and 8.5 (CI 1.6-44.7), respectively.
Conclusion: Uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are at substantial risk of stillbirth throughout the third trimester, which is severalfold higher than in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Given the risk of fetal death to the cotwin, these data should inform decisions around timing of delivery in seemingly normal monochorionic twin pregnancies.
Comment in
-
Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1302. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000026. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24264697 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1302-3. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000027. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24264698 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2016 Sep 6;354:i4353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4353. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27599496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Timing of Delivery for Twins With Growth Discordance and Growth Restriction: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1155-1167. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004789. Epub 2022 May 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35675615 Free PMC article.
-
Should apparently uncomplicated monochorionic twins be delivered electively at 32 weeks?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Nov;22(11):1077-80. doi: 10.3109/14767050903042579. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009. PMID: 19900048
-
Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):569-578. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15530. Epub 2018 Nov 26. BJOG. 2019. PMID: 30461179
-
Selective fetal reduction of uncomplicated dichorionic twins on parental request vs ongoing twins and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Nov;6(11):101492. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101492. Epub 2024 Sep 12. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 39277108 Review.
Cited by
-
Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancies: Twin vs. Singleton Charts.J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 8;10(4):643. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040643. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33567545 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):578.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24607757 Free PMC article.
-
Is the mental health of couples with twins more at risk? Results from an Italian cohort study.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 29;15:1284090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1284090. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38347879 Free PMC article.
-
Twin-twin transfusion syndrome screening and diagnosis in the United States: A triangulation design of patient experiences.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0200087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200087. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29975770 Free PMC article.
-
Should singleton birth weight standards be applied to identify small-for-gestational age twins?: analysis of a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 25;21(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03907-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34172024 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fisk NM, Duncombe GJ, Sullivan MH. The basic and clinical science of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 2009;30:379–90.
-
- Gratacos E, Ortiz JU, Martinez JM. A systematic approach to the differential diagnosis and management of the complications of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:145–55.
-
- Lewi L, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T, de Koninck P, Beck V, Medek H, et al.. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: natural history and risk stratification. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:121–33.
-
- Hillman SC, Morris RK, Kilby MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:928–40.
-
- Barigye O, Pasquini L, Galea P, Chambers H, Chappell L, Fisk NM. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2005;2:e172.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous