Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
- PMID: 11334213
- DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.106
Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Abstract
The authors previously reported that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) showed a striking bias to select the larger of 2 candy arrays, despite a reversed reward contingency in which the animals received the smaller, nonselected array as a reward, except when Arabic numerals were used as stimuli. A perceptual or incentive-based interference occurred that was overcome by symbolic stimuli. The authors of the present study examined the impact of element size in choice arrays, using 1 to 5 large and small candies. Five test-sophisticated chimpanzees selected an array from the 2 presented during each trial. Their responses were not optimal, as animals generally selected arrays with larger total mass; thus, they received the smaller remaining array as a reward. When choice stimuli differed in size and quantity, element size was more heavily weighted, although choices reflected total candy mass. These results replicate previous findings showing chimpanzees' difficulties with quantity judgments under reverse reward contingencies and also show that individual item size exerts a more powerful interference effect.
Similar articles
-
Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):76-86. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996. PMID: 8568498
-
Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.1.82. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995. PMID: 7844508
-
Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):181-91. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.181. J Comp Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11459165
-
Testing differential use of payoff-biased social learning strategies in children and chimpanzees.Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 13;284(1868):20171751. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1751. Proc Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 29187629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Symbolic representation of number in chimpanzees.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Feb;19(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 14. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009. PMID: 19447029 Review.
Cited by
-
Can lemurs (Eulemur fulvus and E. macaco) use abstract representations of quantities to master the reverse-reward contingency task?Primates. 2011 Jul;52(3):253-60. doi: 10.1007/s10329-011-0245-7. Epub 2011 Mar 11. Primates. 2011. PMID: 21394424
-
Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):127-147. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1064-4. Epub 2017 Jan 2. Anim Cogn. 2017. PMID: 28044197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do new caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):247-54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1107. Proc Biol Sci. 2009. PMID: 18796393 Free PMC article.
-
How is chimpanzee self-control influenced by social setting?Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:654094. doi: 10.6064/2012/654094. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Scientifica (Cairo). 2012. PMID: 24278724 Free PMC article.
-
Food Quantity Discrimination in Angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare): The Role of Number, Density, Size and Area Occupied by the Food Items.Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;14:106. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00106. eCollection 2020. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32655384 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
