Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Feb 21;1(1):e00002-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00002-12

Complete Genome Sequence of Prepandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus BB22OP

Roderick V Jensen a, Saylem M DePasquale a, Elizabeth A Harbolick a, Tian Hong a, Alison L Kernell a, David H Kruchko a, Thero Modise a, Cimarron E Smith a, Linda L McCarter b, Ann M Stevens a,
PMCID: PMC3587917  PMID: 23469330

Abstract

The number of inflammatory gastroenteritis outbreaks due to the food-borne pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus is rising sharply worldwide and in the United States in particular. Here we report the complete, annotated genome sequence of the prepandemic V. parahaemolyticus strain BB22OP and make some initial comparisons to the complete genome sequence for pandemic strain RIMD2210633.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is found in marine-associated aquatic environments freely living, attached to abiotic and biotic (e.g., plankton and shellfish) surfaces, or associated with marine animal hosts (1, 2). It is also a major cause of seafood-borne gastroenteritis in humans, occasionally causing death (24). Since the complete genome sequence of clinical isolate RIMD2210633 was published (5), draft genome sequences for several other V. parahaemolyticus strains have been announced (68) or are available online (http://www.genomesonline.org). Here we announce the complete genome sequence of V. parahaemolyticus BB22OP, a Bangladesh environmental isolate from the early 1980s (9). This strain, with an O4:K8 serotype, has been extensively studied with respect to swimming and swarming motility, biofilm development, and phase variation (1015).

A single opaque colony of the V. parahaemolyticus BB22OP strain LM5312 (16) was grown in heart infusion (HI) broth (13) at 30°C overnight. The Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit protocol for Gram-negative bacteria was utilized to extract DNA, which was sequenced using a Roche/454 GS FLX titanium system. A 200× coverage of the genome was achieved and de novo sequence assembly of the reads was then performed using Roche/454 Newbler software. MIRA (http://www.chevreux.org/projects_mira.html) de novo assembly was performed to assist in filling in gaps in the genome assembly. Alignment to the RIMD2210633 reference genome sequence using the Lasergene 8 software package also facilitated complete genome assembly into circular chromosomes 1 and 2 of lengths 3.297 Mbp and 1.806 Mbp, respectively. When necessary, primers were designed and traditional Sanger sequencing was performed to confirm putative assembly junctions. The BB22OP genome contains eleven ∼5-kbp rRNA/tRNA clusters at the same locations as those in RIMD2210633. Since unique Roche/454 or Sanger sequences could not span these regions, the corresponding RIMD2210633 sequences were used to help fill these gaps.

The genome sequence was annotated on the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) with the help of the GenBank annotation of RIMD2210633. Annotation of sequences unique to BB22OP was performed using both GeneMark-P and Genemark.hmm-P (http://exon.biology.gatech.edu). Coding sequences for 2,973 genes on chromosome 1 and 1,653 genes on chromosome 2 were identified. Overall, there is extensive homology between the two strains; >90% of the coding sequences have the same annotation, length, and relative position. There are ∼300 genes novel to BB22OP, and ∼400 genes novel to RIMD2210633. Many of the novel genes appear to be remnants of transposons or phages. With respect to potential virulence traits, and like RIMD2210633, the BB22OP genome encodes thermostable direct hemolysin (Tdh) and two type-3 and two type-6 secretion systems, and it lacks genes encoding thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin (Trh) and urease (Ure) (17). BB22OP also lacks prophage f237 (18) and genomic islands VPaI-1 and VPaI-3 to VPaI-6 (19). The two strains differ in the superintegron on chromosome 1 (∼90 genes) and in two small blocks encoding the O and K antigens (∼12 genes each). With BB22OP being a prepandemic isolate, the genome sequence will provide an important anchor for future comparative genomic and virulence studies.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete, annotated genome sequence for V. parahaemolyticus BB22OP strain LM5312 is available in GenBank under accession numbers CP003972 (BB22OPChr1) and CP003973 (BB22OPChr2).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank C. Evans at the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute Core Laboratory Facility for assistance with the genome sequence and the students in R. V. Jensen’s 2010 and 2011 Computational Genomics and Bioinformatics classes for help with genome assembly and annotation.

This work was funded through a Virginia Tech VBI/Fralin-CR grant.

Footnotes

Citation Jensen RV, DePasquale SM, Harbolick EA, Hong T, Kernell AL, Kruchko DH, Modise T, Smith CE, McCarter LL, Stevens AM. 2013. Complete genome sequence of prepandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus BB22OP. Genome Announc. 1(1):e00002-12. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00002-12.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta B, Takeda Y, Sack DA. 2007. Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clin Microbiol. Rev. 20:39–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Su YC, Liu C. 2007. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol. 24:549–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McLaughlin JB, DePaola A, Bopp CA, Martinek KA, Napolilli NP, Allison CG, Murray SL, Thompson EC, Bird MM, Middaugh JP. 2005. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:1463–1470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Newton A, Kendall M, Vugia DJ, Henao OL, Mahon BE. 2012. Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996–2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54:S391–S395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T, Tagomori K, Iijima Y, Najima M, Nakano M, Yamashita A, Kubota Y, Kimura S, Yasunaga T, Honda T, Shinagawa H, Hattori M, Iida T. 2003. Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V. cholerae. Lancet 361:743–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Boyd EF, Cohen AL, Naughton LM, Ussery DW, Binnewies TT, Stine OC, Parent MA. 2008. Molecular analysis of the emergence of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiol. 8:110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chen Y, Stine OC, Badger JH, Gil AI, Nair GB, Nishibuchi M, Fouts DE. 2011. Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: serotype conversion and virulence. BMC Genomics 12:294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. González-Escalona N, Strain EA, De Jesús AJ, Jones JL, DePaoloa A. 2011. Genome sequence of the clinical O4:K12 serotype Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain 10329. J. Bacteriol. 193:3405–3406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Belas R, Mileham A, Simon M, Silverman M. 1984. Transposon mutagenesis of marine Vibrio spp. J. Bacteriol. 158:890–896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Enos-Berlage JL, Guvener ZT, Keenan CE, McCarter LL. 2005. Genetic determinants of biofilm development of opaque and translucent Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1160–1182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gode-Potratz CJ, Chodur DM, McCarter LL. 2010. Calcium and iron regulate swarming and type III secretion in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 192:6025–6038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gode-Potratz CJ, Kustusch RJ, Breheny PJ, Weiss DS, McCarter LL. 2011. Surface sensing in Vibrio parahaemolyticus triggers a programme of gene expression that promotes colonization and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 79:240–263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gode-Potratz CJ, McCarter LL. 2011. Quorum sensing and silencing in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 193:4224–4237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Matz C, Nouri B, McCarter L, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2011. Acquired type III secretion system determines environmental fitness of epidemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the interaction with bacterivorous protists. PLoS ONE 6:e20275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. McCarter LL. 2004. Dual flagellar systems enable motility under different circumstances. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7:18–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. McCarter LL. 1998. OpaR, a homolog of Vibrio harveyi LuxR, controls opacity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 180:3166–3173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Iida T, Park KS, Suthienkul O, Kozawa J, Yamaichi Y, Yamamoto K, Honda T. 1998. Close proximity of the tdh, trh and ure genes on the chromosome of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiology 144:2517–2523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nasu H, Iida T, Sugahara T, Yamaichi Y, Park KS, Yokoyama K, Makino K, Shinagawa H, Honda T. 2000. A filamentous phage associated with recent pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2156–2161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hurley CC, Quirke A, Reen FJ, Boyd EF. 2006. Four genomic islands that mark post-1995 pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. BMC Genomics 7:104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES