Steward requests/Permissions

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

I have been working at Hindi wikipedia for so long with much of contribution, which can be seen by admin tools, I need not state them. Alongwith working as Admin & thereafter as Bureaucrat for long. Offcourse for last one year my contributions sufferred due to some personal reasons. Still I promise to abide by the policies & contribute towards editing as well as the Admin tasks in future. Request for Admin Rights, as for good editing it is required to have many rights, as deletion, protection, removal of protection & much more. Here it is to be noted that I have been elected by nomination (pls refer this nomination).

Therefore my Admin rights may please be revived. Ashish Bhatnagartalk 03:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

* Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-05-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Just want to enquire that why the dormant sysops पूर्णिमा वर्मन & Munita Prasad have been retained as sysops here (refer) who have been out of any activity so long?

Unfortunately, we cannot track every admin on every project. If you can show that there are people on your project who, according to your own wiki rules, are no longer eligible for being sysops, please file a request for removal below. Also, please make sure you link to the discussion on your project where the removal was reviewed. There are some projects, for example, who do not remove privs for inactivity. -- Avi (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the attention & grant. I actually requested for permanent sysops rights only, but missed to state the same. Actually we at hi.wikipedia generally used to grant permanent adminships, thats why I took missed to state the permanent word. Thats why I had also stated the link to the consensus at hi.wiki. Now if you see, I may be granted permanent admin rights. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 15:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just now observed the current status of the recent consensus at hi.wiki for permanent admin rights. This can be seen at the consensus/request for Permanent admin rights page at hi.wiki. Now I do request for permanent admin rights. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 16:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Done My apologies, I did not realize hi.wiki already has permanent sysops. -- Avi (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• My sincere thanks for a prompt action. Here I would also like to remind that I was elected Bureaucrat on 16 June, 2010 & have been on the post with responsibility till then. This election was with consensus & can be seen on this Archive page. So I request you to please restore the Bureaucrat position rights for me, so that hi.wikipedia also has its one local Bureaucrat & everybody or anybody has no need to call up the stewards for the matters, that can be resolved there. --Ashish Bhatnagartalk 03:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant me permanent administratorship since there is no administrator there. Thank you very much. -- Si Gam (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permanently adminship is too long imho because you had the rights only for 3 months. I'd say 6 months or 1 year for now. Trijnstel_talk 17:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-05-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Why I can not get a permanent adminship? While before I have ever gotten it.. -- Si Gam (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, the community is a bit small, there are no other admins, and there were only four respondents. In six months, we'll see how the project has developed. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He have sysop from May 2012--Shizhao (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Shizhao (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note : This section won't be automatically archived by the bot

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since it has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-02-08. While the project decides whether 8 votes is enough for adminship, I've gone ahead and flagged this editor since its RfA has been opened for a week, has ten or more than ten support votes and a 75% support or higher so this promotion oughtn't be controversial. Given the consensus to reconfirm all elected admins in this first bach, this is set as temporary here. While the reconfirmations can and should be done internally, Wikimedia Stewards wants to keep track of all requests and their status. If the editor is confirmed later please do tell us and we will archive and close the temporary request as renewed. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At http://wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions there are many users who have had a request for admin rights open for at least 7 days. These are (as of 06:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)):

• User:Guerillero
• User:Yair rand
• User:Pigsonthewing
• User:Wiki13
• User:SarahStierch
• User:Yiyi
• User:Superzerocool
• User:Romaine
• User:Hazard-SJ (note: lacks strong support in the discussion: 3 support, 1 oppose)
• User:Stryn
• User:ShinePhantom
• User:Hydriz
• User:Sannita
• User:Restu20
• User:Magalhães (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 2 users)
• User:Tpt
• User:Merlissimo
• User:Sebleouf
• User:Raymond
• User:Emijrp
• User:Wagino 20100516 (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 3 users)
• User:Arkanosis
• User:Jitrixis (note: minor opposition: 9 support, 2 oppose)
• User:Seewolf
• User:Kondicherry (note: lacks sufficient participation in the discussion: only 2 users)
• User:Zanka
• User:Benoit Rochon
• User:Hoo man
• User:Sven Manguard

A strong consensus has formed at http://wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Administrators#Reconfirmation_for_initial_wave_of_admins that these admin rights should be reconfirmed in 3 months' time. However, since there is a large community active at Wikidata, I would expect the project to handle this reconfirmation internally. I don't believe the formal "temporary sysop" procedure needs to be followed in this case.

I will leave it to stewards to select which users have enough support to be promoted. This, that and the other (talk) 06:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to reviewing steward(s): per local consensus ([1]), those with insufficient participation (<8 supports) should probably be subject to further discussion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have modified the format of this request, moving this text down. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for further requests. Please do use the required format for this page next time. The domain for the template is wikidata. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more using the required format:

• User:Michiel1972
• User:Leag
• User:Lomita
• User:TBloemink
• User:Jdforrester
• User:Grondin
• User:Skull33
• User:Koavf

But I did not use permanent links like you did, because more votes may be added before the requests are decided. This, that and the other (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

I am a local administrator on ku.wikt.Local bureaucrats are almost inactive see here and here. Please promote. Thanks.If any questions then email me here--Thx in advance--George Animal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.176.174.245 (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2012‎

Please, provide a link to the local discussion of this issue. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until at least 12 November. Trijnstel_talk 17:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To me the best solution would be removing current bureaucrats, I don't see a sufficient community to hold local 'crats. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In agreement with Vituzzi, v. low activity — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Please remove sysop rights of my bot. I asked for temporary adminship for mass deletion of over 33,000 local pages of Commons images that were used for WLM purposes. As I have completed this task, my bot does not need sysop rights anymore. Thanks — NickK (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the help! Trijnstel_talk 13:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove my sysop , bureaucrat , checkuser, and oversight access. Thanks --Vigorous action (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC) --Vigorous action (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done thank you for your service. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

I would like to apply for importer rights for ro.wikibooks in order to import some articles about the English language grammar from ro.wp (ro:Categorie:Timpurile_limbii_engleze)--Strainu (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that it would be more useful to submit a bugzilla to have rowiki be added as an import source for rowikibooks, and then we can assign transwiki import rights. Look at http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php and search for wgImport. Then I would recommend a bugzilla requesting ... 'rowikibooks' => array( 'w', 's', 'commons' ), — billinghurst sDrewth 04:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted bug 41774. Thanks for the detailed explanation.--Strainu (talk) 08:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The change is now live, you can now assign transwiki import rights.--Strainu (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done glad that it was helpful. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apply for importer rights for in order to import templates from the English wikipedia and sister projects.--Arjunaraoc (talk) 17:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer