Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/Contest
 | This WikiProject is defunct. Consider looking for related projects for help or ask at the Teahouse. If you feel this project may be worth reviving, please discuss with related projects first. Feel free to change this tag if the parameters were changed in error.
|
| Sign up as a contestant in the Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons Contest now. |
This contest's goal is to provide motivation to tackle the problem of a backlog of unreferenced biographies of living people on Wikipedia. This is a friendly contest in which the assumption of good faith is expected of all participants. The editor with the most points at the end of each month will receive something shiny to display on their userpage and bragging rights for a job well done. The winners will be everyone who uses Wikipedia, because with enough participation in this contest our goal of having verifiable information at our fingertips will be enhanced.
Rationale
[edit]As of 18 February 2010 there are just over 43,000 biographies of living people on Wikipedia that are tagged as having no references. As a part of one of the five pillars of Wikipedia it has been determined that content should be verifiable with citations to reliable sources. Articles about living people are particularly sensitive and should be treated with attention to verifiability, neutrality and avoiding original research.
Rules
[edit]- Points will be awarded for appropriately being able to remove a {{BLP unsourced}} tag from an article within a calendar month. This can be achieved by sourcing the article, merging/redirecting it to a more appropriate article, or by having it deleted by appropriate means (speedy deletion, proposed deletion, or articles for deletion.
- Unsportsmanlike conduct and assumptions of bad faith will lead to disqualification from the contest. It must always be remembered that the primary goal of this contest is to improve the encyclopedia.
Points
[edit]| submission | points |
|---|---|
| Sourcing an article to the point that it no longer should have a {{BLP unsourced}} tag but still requires a {{BLPrefimprove}} tag. | 1 |
| Fully sourcing an article (hard-to-verify information should be removed, preferably using the {{BLP unverified}} template) | 5 |
| Having a page redirected to a more appropriate page and merging any verifiable information with correct sourcing | 3 |
| Having a page deleted under {{db-g10}} for defamation | 25 |
| Having a page deleted by any other legitimate means | 5 |
| Having a request for speedy deletion properly refused or overturned, unless the article is properly deleted otherwise | -10 |
| Having a request for speedy deletion properly refused or overturned, and the article properly deleted otherwise | -5 |
| Having a PROD removed, unless the article is subsequently deleted by AfD or speedy | -1 |
| Having a request for deletion at AfD refused or overturned by a keep decision | -2 |
| Having a request for deletion at AfD refused or overturned by a no-consensus or merge or redirect decision | -1 |
Scoring
[edit]Judging
[edit]In the spirit for which this contest is intended the honor system and the assumption of good faith shall be the law of the land. If anyone is not sure of how many points that they should award themselves they should post a request on the talk page for advice. Assumptions of bad faith, quarreling or bickering will result in a trout slap with repeated violations resulting in disqualification. If any participants are found to be harming the encyclopedia in order to score points they will be first educated in the proper means of acquiring points and required to correct all damage done, or removed from the competition for repeated or egregious violations.
Contestants
[edit]Please sign up now: /March 2010 Signups
Standings
[edit]Prizes
[edit]Please discuss your prize ideas on the talk page.