Jump to content

User talk:Gamaliel: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 503: Line 503:


The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Using archive.is#rfc_C579111|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Using archive.is''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 48752 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Using archive.is#rfc_C579111|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Using archive.is''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 48752 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

==Appealing your sanction==
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Ranze]]

I'm supposed to notify you about this since you put it in place. I skipped requesting directly since it says you are retired and if I waited and didn't begin it now I'd probably forget and put it off another several months.

Sorry for the bother if you are not interested, I don't mean to harass someone who has retired from editing. [[User:Ranze|Ranze]] ([[User talk:Ranze|talk]]) 06:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:44, 9 July 2016


Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Wikidata weekly summary #209

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

Announcement regarding Gamaliel

Gamaliel has resigned as an arbitrator because he is currently unable to edit the English Wikipedia and is therefore entirely inactive as an arbitrator. This has come about as a result of circumstances which have been disclosed to the Committee, and which in no way reflect negatively on him. We thank Gamaliel for his service on the 2016 Committee to date and wish him the best.

For the Arbitration Committee, Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the Arbitration Committee [cross-posted], Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Announcement regarding Gamaliel

Proposed decision posted

Hi Gamaliel, in the open Gamaliel and others arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.  Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 13:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see what's been happening to you

I've got a friend who's a writer and a columnist who wrote several pieces about the Gamergate stuff - to this day, those freaktards won't stop harassing and hounding him. They even tried to SWAT him twice. It must really suck watching them given free rein to harass people here. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 21:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #210

Don't know that you'll see this, but....

Thanks Gamaliel. Dumuzid (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Thank you for brightening up my first of April, what a shame it was deleted. :( T.i 18:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #211

This Month in Education: [June 2016]






If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

We hope you enjoy the newest issue of the Education Newsletter.--Sailesh Patnaik (Distribution leader) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
  2. DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
  3. DHeyward (talk · contribs) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
  4. For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
  5. Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
  6. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

Arb case was a joke

Gamaliel,

This arb case was a joke that should have never happened. You posted an April Fools joke, and sadly, your detractors saw it as a chance to run you out of the Wikipedia. I'm sorry to see that you've retired and hope that you'll return to Wikipedia. KoshVorlon 11:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you! Please come back soon, we need more people like you. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Please come back! This wasn't necessary for an ArbCom case, and we need good editors like you.

ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 13:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #212

Wikidata weekly summary #213

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

  • New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
  • Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
  • New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #214

Please comment on Talk:Christina Grimmie

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christina Grimmie. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Ethics in journalism and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Rhoark (talk) 18:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #215

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #216

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Using archive.is. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing your sanction

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Ranze

I'm supposed to notify you about this since you put it in place. I skipped requesting directly since it says you are retired and if I waited and didn't begin it now I'd probably forget and put it off another several months.

Sorry for the bother if you are not interested, I don't mean to harass someone who has retired from editing. Ranze (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]