Jump to content

Talk:Peter II of Bulgaria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Emperor's New Spy (talk | contribs) at 06:12, 16 January 2017 (Requested move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

This article is idiotic. The Disputed Origins section is larger than the actual history of czar Peter's life. The Vlach-Rumanian theory is one of the most proposterous in the world, and devoid of any logic. When Czar Ivan Asen II - nephew of Peter and son of czar Ivan Asen I became the Bulgarian ruler he did not (not once) refer to himself or was refered to by others as Vlach. So what do Rumanian historians claim - that he was somehow "assimilated"? Or maybe he just forgot. His descendants too. It's just so stupid it's not even worth arguing. - Mladen

History is not logical. Andrew Dalby 00:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Or maybe, just maybe, history IS in fact logical. And stupid articles like this one, written by petty nationalists, are not. Just a thought - but then again, you do have to, in fact, read history in order to answer that. - Mladen

Name

As per WP:Name, I would like to know which reliable source published in English refers to him as Peter IV of Bulgaria? The following sources do not use that name:

  • Chary, Frederick B. (2011). The History of Bulgaria. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-38446-2. [He writes of "Todor (Peter II, Tsar)".]
  • Crampton, R. J. (2005). A Concise History of Bulgaria. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89452-4. [He refers to him as "Petûr II".]
  • Curta, Florin (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85085-8. [He writes of "Peter, Vlach rebel".]
  • Fine, John V. A (1994). The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-08260-4. [He refers to him as "Peter II of Bulgaria (brother of Asen)".]
  • Madgearu, Alexandru (2017). The Asanids: The Political and Military History of the Second Bulgarian Empire, 1185–1280. BRILL. ISBN 978-9-004-32501-2. [He writes of "Peter (brother of John Asan I)".]
  • Stephenson, Paul (2000). Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-02756-4. [He mentions him as "Peter, Bulgarian and Vlach ruler".]
  • Treadgold, Warren (1997). A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2630-2. [He refers to him as "Peter (Bulgarian emperor of the restored empire)".]
  • Vásáry, István (2005). Cumans and Tatars: Oriental Military in the Pre-Ottoman Balkans, 1185–1365. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83756-1. [He writes of "Peter, Kalopetrus".]

Based on the above sources, I think, Peter II of Bulgaria would be the proper title of the article. Borsoka (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Peter IV of BulgariaPeter II of Bulgaria – Per above. And it seems the other Peters were rebel leaders. --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]