User talk:Oo7565

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Oo7565! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

• If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
• If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1790 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?

1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
4. Are you autoconfirmed?
5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1790 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention.

Do you have what it takes?

1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
4. Are you (at least) autoconfirmed?
5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Click here to review to a random submission_{Article selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver.}

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial.

On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
AndrewN ^talk 23:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]