Enough expository banter!
- Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (
~~~~) or five in a talk bubble. - Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- Please read our Conduct guideline. In a nutshell: be polite, assume good faith.
- For general non-wiki discussion on this topic, feel free to discuss on Discord or Discussions.
Hi, i think the page would be soewhat better if we changed the group lists into one big table using the group number as row and the RNG number (0-7) as column.
You can see what the result would look like on my sandbox but I would like to know if people would be ok with that before hand.RingoRoadagain (talk) 15:39, February 12, 2019 (UTC)
- Hmm, that one doesn't quite fit horizontally in the default desktop view. I think the current one might still be better for that reason.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 17:31, February 12, 2019 (UTC)
- I managed to make the table fit the desktop view (see here). So, like I said before, I think it would be a better presentation than the one we currently use and would like to know if it's okay to make the change?RingoRoadagain (talk) 21:02, May 19, 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. I don't know what template you're using though, that's not the regular table thing with the class colors etc.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 16:59, May 20, 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, i took it from another wiki and was thinking that was a common template since it didn't mess the table or anything (guess i was just lucky). I just updated my sandbox to try and standardise the table (i got this new header from Strago's Lore page).
- Looks good to me. I don't know what template you're using though, that's not the regular table thing with the class colors etc.Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 16:59, May 20, 2019 (UTC)
- In case i get more feedback, i guess i'll only update the actual Veldt page tomorrow (give or take). After that people could change it further if necessary (that's the purpose of a wiki after all)RingoRoadagain (talk) 21:13, May 20, 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah we got different colors for each game (from the game logo), but they don't show in the mobile version of the site anyway. Good table!Keltainentoukokuu (talk) 09:25, May 21, 2019 (UTC)
- In case i get more feedback, i guess i'll only update the actual Veldt page tomorrow (give or take). After that people could change it further if necessary (that's the purpose of a wiki after all)RingoRoadagain (talk) 21:13, May 20, 2019 (UTC)
List of missable monsters?[]
Could there be a list of missable monsters? Obviously the biggest divide would be WoB exclusive monsters. There can be smaller one time exclusive locations. It's also extremely tempting to walk around with the Moogle Charm all the time for avoiding the time consuming battles.--PlNG (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- There's a list here, though it could certainly stand to be added to the page in some manner, preferably with a when/where they can be found. But that'd be a bigger undertaking. DrakeyC (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay, there's a table now. Good to have this for the sake of the upcoming Pixel Remaster which won't have the Soul Shrine. I don't think it necessary though to list every World of Balance enemy since they are mostly missable; imho the link unrevisitable locations and just fair warning those encounters are lost in the World of Ruin will suffice. DrakeyC (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)