User talk:Princefancy

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Scott, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Scott, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W (talk) 22:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Scott with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Jeremy Scott. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats as 75.20.130.79 and abusing multiple accounts as shown at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/75.20.130.79. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]