Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Userboxes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Userbox sample compact

[edit]

{{Userbox sample compact}} used on wp:userboxes#Userbox sampling templates was deleted. Is there an alternative or should that section be deleted? Thank you Adakiko (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

added an {{update}}
 akesi akise 19:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More than likely be removed? It's possible that a similar template would be removed, however don't take my word for granted. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 02:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Standardized documentation

[edit]

On a quick search, I'm not seeing any {{Userbox documentation}} template providing a standardized documentation for user boxes. This seems like something that should exist and be used. Sdkbtalk 18:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can make that. Would you like me to start it? thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 21:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdkb thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 21:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheTechie, sure, feel free to! Rolling it out widely may be the more significant challenge. Sdkbtalk 21:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdkb I now have a skeleton of a documentation. You (or anyone else watching this page) is free to improve it, and give feedback on the template talk page. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(at the template link above) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, I'd start by using {{Documentation}} in it... Sdkbtalk 04:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, there are also shared documentation templates {{Userbox/categories}} and {{Userbox/citydoc}}. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The page puts way too much emphasis on templates and preexisting Userboxes. Stargazer49 (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update wording of "Cautions about image use"

[edit]

The wording of the WP:UBX#Caution about image use subsection probably should be tweaked because fair use on Wikipedia is better referred to as non-free content because Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is actually more restrictive than fair use by design, and it's because of the this policy (WP:NFCC#9) that non-free images aren't allowed to be used in userboxes. You could actually argue that such a use would be allowed under "fair use", but that's not really what's relevant here. Using "non-free content" and "fair use content" interchangeably often leads to problems whenever such files are discussed because many mistakenly assume they're one and the same; so, it's better not to do so on policy/guideline pages whenever possible. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aa : total

[edit]

By Chris Messina, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7188066 AhmadSuhrab51 (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]