Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something in the Water (music festival)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Something in the Water (music festival) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In agreement with the issue templates of notability and self-published sources, files this one under WP:TOOSOON. Maybe next year if it becomes an annual event. (And please, don't think lineup appearances equal notability because it does not.) I do think it could stand to be merged with Pharrell Williams though. Trillfendi (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Soft delete - WP:TOOSOON - only one season - three of the references are to the festival's website and one was a press release, so no significant coverage - does not meet WP:EVENT at this point, but may gain notability in the future and be eligible for refund - Epinoia (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with the above. "Hard" deletion should be preferred as most of the text in the article was either sourced from PR material or copyright-infringing (see article history), so we're not actually losing anything by deleting it (eg. editors' time and effort), while providing a future editor a clean slate to write on that's free of copy-vio and PR cruft. François Robere (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.