User talk:Lexicon

Archives	α    Jul 4, 2005 – Jul 4, 2006 β    Jul 5, 2006 – Oct 25, 2006 γ    Oct 25, 2006 – Feb 2, 2007 δ    Feb 12, 2007 – Jun 14, 2007 ε    Jun 14, 2007 – Oct 26, 2007 ζ    Oct 26, 2007 – Apr 14, 2009 η    Apr 15, 2009 – Nov 19, 2010 θ    Nov 20, 2010 - May 11, 2019

The file File:Cardamom seeds.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Triplets.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Gotland crest flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Froya crest flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You recently removed the link to File:Flag of Palmyra Atoll (local).svg from the Palmyra Atoll article's infobox, saying that its being "made by some GIs" rendered it inappropriate for WP. While a similar flag was originally designed by American GIs, the included source says that The Nature Conservancy made several modifications before approving it. Will you reconsider inclusion of the atoll steward's version of the flag? —ADavidB 13:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you complete all the steps after posting Trebek. Stephen 22:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That all looks good thanks. Hope to see you posting more as there's often a backlog to post and never enough admins. Recent deaths don't have to have any measure of notability, as the existence of an article is enough. This rule puts an end to arguments of whether a person was worthy enough to be on the main page. All we look for is a solid, verifiable BLP, with citations in every paragraph and references for all their work. Thanks again. Stephen 23:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the corrections you made on the page, Barley tea. SyrOrange88 (talk) 14:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already read the sentence. The only change I would make is: "chisel(l)ing" instead of "carving," so as not to repeat ("carving" and "carved")... but I recommend to look for a native English speaker (I am a certified English-Spanish-English translator, yes, but my mother tongue is Spanish, not English; besides, I am not a historian, but a psychologist): perhaps s/he would know better the deep sense of "chisel", "carve", and "sculpt". Thanks a lot for turning to me! Hope you and all your family's health is ok! Regards from Mexico City (CDMX). Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito o Heme aquí) 02:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ballhogs-1.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lexicon,

What program did you use to generate the diagram for the Scottish Parliament? I tried to wrangle Photoshop, but it was horribly inefficient and the colors never matched the official party colors.

By the way, the reason I uploaded the screenshot from Your Scottish Parliament("my version") under a new name was because I saw a Commons page (I now can't find) that said something like 'if the change is major don't upload a new version/make a new filename'. Egroeg5 (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lexicon, thank you for your tireless contributions to Wikipedia. Please be aware that, although common games like backgammon are spelt in lower case in the press and general literature, sources on tables games frequently capitalise the names of games and especially the less well known ones. This aids clarity and avoids confusion. Also, while there has been a general transition towards lower case in North America, that is not necessarily the situation elsewhere in the English speaking world. So currently neither should be preferred or deprecated. So I'd be really grateful if you'd undo your recent lower case edits to tables games articles. Many thanks for your understanding. Bermicourt (talk) 13:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your point of view. In some cases, not a single WP:RELIABLE SOURCE has the name in lower case, so Wikipedia is breaking new ground here. I've read the guidance, but it's written by a couple of North American editors who are zealous about imposing their regional preferences on the rest of the world. Wikipedia is meant to reflect the real world not create its own version of it. So I guess we'll have to agree to differ. Bermicourt (talk) 08:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been on Wikipedia a long time and I've also studied the literature in this area. The overriding rule on Wikipedia is WP:RELIABLE SOURCES, not the average English reader's level of knowledge. I've also researched trends on lower case and there are dozen of articles out there which have noticed that over the last few decades American English has become much more informal, including decapitalising words and titles. If you're immersed in that culture, you of course wouldn't notice this. The reports also make clear that, although this trend is starting elsewhere, it is nowhere near as advanced. So just as with WP:ENGVAR, where the sources vary, we should not mandate a particular solution and mass delete all other options. There are good reasons why game researchers and writers, even North American ones, often use title case - for clarity. Many of the names are the same or similar to those of contracts, bonuses, equipment or other game features. Anyway, we clearly aren't going to agree, so let's draw a line under this, move on and concentrate on improving the sum of human knowledge. Bermicourt (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We're not going to convince one another, you've made the changes you want and you're an admin, so I'm unlikely to get them reverted. Please let's not prolong this fruitless discussion. Bermicourt (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A token of thanks Hi Lexicon! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grand Lodge of Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BEFORE search did not produce sources. Does not pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Z1720 (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Celts and Modern Celts sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Celtic nations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]