User talk:Mx. Granger

Archives

2007–2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello, I am almost done editing my sample page in sandbox but I could not figure out how to add a proper short bio to figure caption. Your help is appreciated. Thank you for your time. I.Irembor (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Irembor, thanks for the message. After opening the VisualEditor, click on the image and an "Edit" button should pop up. Click on that, and there will be a box to enter a caption, then click "Apply changes". Let me know if you have any trouble with that, or if you have any other questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. What I meant is adding a template for the caption, including fields like "Born" , "Education" etc. An example can be seen in this page: Khaled B. Letaief. Thanks for your time. Irembor (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Your response below is exactly what I needed! Irembor (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Irembor: Ah, you're looking for something called an infobox. Open the VisualEditor, put the cursor at the beginning of the article text, then click the "+" button at the top of the editor. Choose "Template", and then enter the name of an infobox template (for instance, "Infobox academic" or "Infobox engineer" or many others depending on the topic of the article). You can find detailed information about what kinds of information the infoboxes can contain by going to the page about each one, for instance Template:Infobox academic or Template:Infobox engineer. Hopefully that's enough to get you started, but let me know if you have any follow-up questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ross Ulbricht on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Legends of the Condor Heroes (2025) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wish ti create a page about myself and immortalise my contributions to football ⚽️ and engineering, society in general --EngineerMto (talk) 19:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EngineerMto, thanks for the message. Writing an article about yourself is not encouraged, because Wikipedia articles are required to be written from a neutral point of view, and it's very hard to be neutral when writing about yourself. But if you still want to try, take a look at Wikipedia's guideline on conflicts of interest and the introductory guide Help:Your first article. Let me know if you have any other questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Mx ,was just doing a draft and then give to someone, or yourself to look at and approve..in long term will engage neutral consultant EngineerMto (talk) 09:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!! Out of curiosity, are there any search engines / programs you would recommend for finding sources that pre-date the internet? (I.e older newspapers, books, broadcasts) --Chordcode (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chordcode, good question. Here are some that I use:

• Google Books (has an option to choose a date range)
• Newspapers.com (costs money, but available through The Wikipedia Library once you get more experience editing Wikipedia).
• Project Gutenberg
• The Internet Archive and Open Library
• WorldCat

Sometimes I also try my local library, or a public university library near me. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Granger - just published my first two drafts. Would love your input:

• Typical Gamer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Typical_Gamer
• JOGO Studios: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:JOGO_Studios --Clasm31 (talk) 00:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clasm31, thanks for the message. It looks like someone has already given you feedback on Draft:JOGO Studios, which I agree with – that draft reads almost like an "about us" page that the company might publish about itself. I would remove language like "Rapid iteration and frequent updates underpin JOGO’s production strategy", which reads like marketing copy, and try to put more emphasis on third-party evaluations of JOGO's work.

I think Draft:Typical Gamer looks better, but I have some concerns about the sourcing. I checked a few of the links, and they don't seem to include the quotes that you've attributed to them – for instance, this source doesn't include the phrase "The ceremony is small in-person but massive in online reach." The "quote" field in citation templates is supposed to be used for an exact quote from the source, if relevant, and should otherwise be left blank. Also, I'm curious, why does that draft include backslashes before the dollar signs, as in "US\$2"? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mx. Granger, I hope this message finds you well! I am reaching out to seek your expertise and advice on improving my contributions on Wikipedia, particularly regarding edit summaries. If you have any tips or best practices you could share, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you for your time!

- Best regards, Uhuhmiuhmuhidk Uhuhmiuhmuhidk (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uhuhmiuhmuhidk, thanks for the message. Edit summaries really just need to summarize what you did, so that other editors can easily get a general idea of the purpose of the edit when scanning a list of changes. My edit summary here is an example. If the reason for your edit is not obvious, it's also helpful to provide the rationale in the edit summary, as I did here. You can find lots more advice at Help:Edit summary. Let me know if you have any other questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I do have a couple of questions. I prefer to use the raw markup language, with which I am somewhat familiar.

I can't quite figure how to cite a reference I want to use again. Could you show me an example?

And sometime when I try to link to another WP page, the link shows up as no such page, even when I am looking right at it. Is there a preferred format for such links? --Lois Hacker (talk) 20:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lois Hacker, thanks for the message. If you want to use a reference multiple times, you need to give it a name. For example, in the article Impossible Whopper, there is a citation to the Tampa Bay Times that looks like this: <ref name="We tried Burger King's meatless Tampa Bay">{{cite news |last=Figueroa IV|first=Daniel|date=August 14, 2019|title=We tried Burger King's meatless Impossible Whopper so you don't have to. |url=https://www.tampabay.com/arts-entertainment/food/2019/08/14/we-tried-burger-kings-meatless-impossible-whopper-so-you-dont-have-to/ | [...some parameters omitted...] }}</ref>. The key is that instead of starting with just <ref>, it starts with <ref name="We tried Burger King's meatless Tampa Bay">. Then same citation is invoked elsewhere in the article with the wikitext <ref name="We tried Burger King's meatless Tampa Bay" />. You can find documentation at Wikipedia:Inline citation#Ref tags, and let me know if you'd like me to explain in more detail.

As for the linking issue, could it be an uppercase/lowercase difference? In Wikipedia article titles, the first character is not case sensitive but the rest of the title is, so Third Month Fair and third Month Fair both lead to the same article, but Third month Fair is (currently) a redlink. If that's not it, could you give me an example so I can understand the problem? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to link to the page for Edmund Ludlow, the general. For some reason, I can't get a link to work, with or without a pipe.

Thanks for the information on the named reference. I'm familiar with that, in general. Lois Hacker (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to create a link. Not sure how it worked. Lois Hacker (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you figured it out – let me know if you have any other questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering - what's the difference between the bright blue links and the faded purple ones? Lois Hacker (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Normally the links start out blue but turn purple if you've already visited the linked page. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah Thanks. Lois Hacker (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I asked a question here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Open_Society_Foundations about the entry regarding OSF being banned in Pakistan, but I was wondering if / how I might go about getting that section of the record changed? Thanks --LibraryJane (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LibraryJane, thanks for the message. Because that article is semi-protected and your account is still pretty new, you can't edit the article directly, but you can request an edit on the talk page. Follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Edit requests and someone will take a look. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! LibraryJane (talk) 09:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering how to upload an image to a page that lacks one, and how do so while following the sites copyright policies? I've tried reading through some pages on here but it's kind of overwhelming.

If it helps, I have a source for this image. Not a person-- a press is where it says it's from.

Thanks. :) --Lonelytravellerr (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lonelytravellerr, thanks for the message. The main policy (Wikipedia:Non-free content) can be a bit confusing, but the specific section WP:NFCI gives some useful examples of what's acceptable. If you go to Wikipedia:File upload wizard and click "Upload a non-free file", the forms will guide you through the process if you follow them carefully. After the image has been uploaded, you can add it to the article by clicking the "+" button in the VisualEditor menu when editing the article.

Or if you tell me a bit more about the image (including what article you want to add it to and how the image is relevant to the article), I can give you more detailed advice. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd to upload the second image in this article of Aramis to Aramis (horse) so that there's an image for reference. The article says that The Canadian Press is credited with taking the photo. Lonelytravellerr (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Since the horse died years ago, the photo should meet Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content as it's impossible for a new free-content photo to be taken. You can go ahead and upload it by going to Wikipedia:File upload wizard and clicking "Upload a non-free file". Then you can add it to the article by opening the VisualEditor, clicking on the infobox in the upper right, and adding the file name to the "image" field. Let me know if you have any trouble! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:12, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay! The photo also has the horse's rider in it who's still alive though. Does that affect anything? --- Lonelytravellerr (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the Wikipedia article about the horse, that doesn't affect anything, but that would mean this photo probably can't be used in the Wikipedia article about the jockey (if we have one). —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks! I'll upload it when my account gets confirmed in a couple of days.

There is an article for the rider, though it's a stub. I'm working on finding sources to expand it. Because the rider is still alive, does this mean that I can't upload images of him onto his own page at all (because I haven't taken the photos myself)? Lonelytravellerr (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's right, you would need to take the photo yourself or find a photo that has been released under a free license (as described at commons:Commons:Licensing). —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help. --- Lonelytravellerr (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I'm wondering when the content assessment bot gets around to doing its thing. I've edited a couple of existing profiles rated as "stub" and "start", and I noticed that these ratings haven't changed. As I always want to improve my work, these assessments should be useful. Lois Hacker (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lois Hacker, good question. In general content assessment is done by humans, so I wouldn't count on the content assessment bots to do anything much. The bots only handle straightforward cases (for instance, if a human has already updated the article's class in one place, a bot might update the class in another template to keep it up to date). If you think you've improved an article from "stub" to "start", or from "start" to "C", you're welcome to update that yourself based on the criteria at Wikipedia:Content assessment. Only the top classes ("good", "A", and "featured") require discussion first.

If you'd like to get feedback from other editors about whether the article is ready to be reassessed with a higher rating, you can post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Requesting an assessment. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I may post there. I wouldn't update the rating myself, as to me those criteria are vague to the point of meaninglessness. But "Hercules Huncks" seems clearly no longer a stub. Lois Hacker (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Hercules Huncks is no longer a stub. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]