Talk:PS Hero

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance PS Hero is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Removed {{csb-pageincluded|1=http://www.hero.net.au/history.html}} tag as article has been sourced from two different cited sources^[1][2], including the one referenced by the tag.

Cruickshanks (talk) 06:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mumble. You have a *lot* of phrases that are very similar to that history page[1]. In fact, it is suspiciously close to the result of what you'd get if you'd copied the text and edited it until it looked different - which in copyright terms is creating a derived work, not creating a new work; derived works are tainted with the copyright and licensing of the original source. But the overall page looks quite different now. I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt. --Alvestrand (talk) 08:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]