Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemen Chiang (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
keep
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Promotional, not well sourced with truly reliable sources [[User:Weißer Storch|Weißer Storch]] ([[User talk:Weißer Storch|talk]]) 10:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Promotional, not well sourced with truly reliable sources [[User:Weißer Storch|Weißer Storch]] ([[User talk:Weißer Storch|talk]]) 10:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Singapore|Singapore]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 11:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|Businesspeople]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Singapore|Singapore]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 11:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources about his public impact. The nominator should be more specific about the reasons for this AfD, since this issue of sources was already brought in the previous one and the sources mentioned there were not challenged. As for a supposed promotional nuance, I don't know what to say, it seems pretty matter-of-fact to me, what else should be mentioned or dropped? [[User:Manzzoku|Manzzoku]] ([[User talk:Manzzoku|talk]]) 15:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources about his public impact. The nominator should be more specific about the reasons for this AfD, since this issue of sources was already brought in the previous one and the sources mentioned there were not challenged. As for a supposed promotional nuance, I don't know what to say, it seems pretty matter-of-fact to me [[User:Manzzoku|Manzzoku]] ([[User talk:Manzzoku|talk]]) 15:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:32, 8 November 2023

Clemen Chiang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, not well sourced with truly reliable sources Weißer Storch (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]