Jump to content

Anthroposophic medicine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Anthroposophical medicine)
This article is part of a series on
Alternative medicine
General information
Fringe medicine and science
Controversies
Classifications
Traditional medicine
Alternative diagnoses
Part of a series on
Anthroposophy
General
Anthroposophically inspired work
Philosophy

Anthroposophic medicine (or anthroposophical medicine) is a form of alternative medicine based on pseudoscientific and occult notions.[1] Devised in the 1920s by Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925) in conjunction with Ita Wegman (1876–1943), anthroposophical medicine draws on Steiner's spiritual philosophy, which he called anthroposophy. Practitioners employ a variety of treatment techniques based upon anthroposophic precepts, including massage, exercise, counselling, and administration of substances.[2]

Many drug preparations used in anthroposophic medicine are ultra-diluted, similar to those used in homeopathy. Homeopathic remedies are not medically effective and are generally considered harmless, except when used as a substitute for a scientifically proven and effective prevention and cure.[3] In certain European countries, people with cancer are sometimes prescribed remedies made from specially harvested mistletoe, although no evidence of clinical benefit exists.[4][5] Some anthroposophic doctors oppose childhood vaccination, and this has led to preventable outbreaks of disease.[6]

Anthroposophic medicine departs from fundamental biological, physical and chemical principles in several respects. For example, Steiner said that the heart is not a pump, but that the blood in a sense pumps itself.[7][8] Anthroposophic medicine also proposes that patients' past lives may influence their illness and that the course of an illness is subject to karmic destiny.[9][10] Professor of complementary medicine Edzard Ernst and other physicians and scientists including Simon Singh and David Gorski have characterized anthroposophic medicine as pseudoscientific quackery,[11][12] with no basis in reason or logic.[13][14][15]

Background

[edit]
Co-founders of anthroposophic medicine
Rudolf Steiner in Berlin in 1900
Rudolf Steiner
Ita Wegman in 1899
Ita Wegman

History

[edit]
Ita Wegman, co-founder of the medical approach, before 1900 in Berlin

According to Egil Asprem, "Steiner's teachings had a clear authoritarian ring, and developed a rather crass polemic against 'materialism', 'liberalism', and cultural 'degeneration'. [...] For example, anthroposophical medicine was developed to contrast with the 'materialistic' (and hence 'degenerate') medicine of the establishment."[16] According to Anthroposophy, mainstream medical science is Ahrimanic.[17]

The first steps towards an anthroposophic approach to medicine were made before 1920, when homeopathic physicians and pharmacists began working with Rudolf Steiner, who recommended new medicinal substances as well as specific methods for preparation along with an anthroposophic concept of man. In 1921, Ita Wegman opened the first anthroposophic medical clinic, now known as the Klinik Arlesheim,[18] in Arlesheim, Switzerland. Wegman was soon joined by a number of other doctors. They then began to train the first anthroposophic nurses for the clinic.

At Wegman's request, Steiner regularly visited the clinic and suggested treatment regimes for particular patients. Between 1920 and 1925, he also gave several series of lectures on medicine. In 1925, Wegman and Steiner wrote the first book on the anthroposophic approach to medicine, Fundamentals of Therapy.[19][20]

Wegman later opened a separate clinic and curative home in Ascona. Wegman lectured widely, visiting the Netherlands and England particularly frequently, and an increasing number of doctors began to include the anthroposophic approach in their practices. A cancer clinic, the Lukas Clinic, opened in Arlesheim in 1963.[21]

In 1976 anthroposophic medicine in Germany got regulated by law as a specific therapeutic system ("Besondere Therapierichtung") by the Medicines Act-Arzneimittelgesetz (AMG) and by the Code of Social Law (Sozialgesetzbuch V)[22]

In the 1990s the Witten/Herdecke University in Germany established a chair in anthroposophical medicine. The press described the appointment as a "death sentence" and the perception that pseudoscience was being taught damaged the university's reputation, bringing it close to financial collapse. It was ultimately saved by a cash injection from Software AG, a technology corporation with a history of funding anthroposophic projects.[13]

In 2012 the University of Aberdeen considered establishing a chair in holistic health jointly funded by Software AG, and by the Anthroposophic Health, Education, and Social Care Movement, each of which would provide £1.5 million of endowment.[13] Edzard Ernst commented "that any decent university should even consider an anthroposophical medicine unit seems incomprehensible. The fact that it would be backed by people who have a financial interest in this bogus approach makes it even worse."[13] The university's governance and nominations committee eventually decided not to proceed with the appointment.[12]

Categorization and conceptual basis

[edit]

The categorization of anthroposophical medicine is complex since in part it complements conventional medicine, and in part it substitutes for it.[1] In 2008, Ernst wrote that it was being promoted as an "extension to conventional medicine".[6]

Ernst writes that Steiner used imagination and insight as a basis for his ideas, drawing mystical knowledge from the occult Akashic Records, a work which is supposedly situated on the astral plane, and which Steiner said was accessible to him via his intuitive powers.[3] On this basis, Steiner proposed "associations between four postulated dimensions of the human body (physical body, etheric body, astral body, and ego), plants, minerals, and the cosmos".[2] Steiner also proposed a connection betweens planets, metals and organs so that, for example, the planet Mercury, the element mercury and the lung were all somehow associated. These propositions form the basis of anthroposophical medicine.[3]

Ernst has said that anthroposophical medicine "includes some of the least plausible theories one could possibly imagine",[23] categorized it as "pure quackery",[12] and said that it "has no basis in science".[13] According to Quackwatch, anthroposophical medicine practitioners regard illness as a "rite of passage" necessary to purge spiritual impurities carried over from past lives, according to the precepts of "karmic destiny".[9]

Anthroposophical MDs think diseases are caused primarily by karma and demons, rather than materialistic causes.[24] The Gospel of Luke is their main handbook of medical science; this makes them believe they have magical powers, and that medicine is essentially a form of magic.[24] The professional French organization of Anthroposophic MDs have sued Grégoire Perra, the author of such claims; they have been condemned to pay 25,000 Euros damages for abusively suing him.[24]

Methods

[edit]
Weleda anthroposophic products sold in Brazil

In anthroposophic pharmacy, drugs are prepared according to notions of alchemy and homeopathy rather than the science underlying modern pharmacology.[2] During the preparation process, patterns formed by crystallization are interpreted to see which "etheric force" they most closely resemble.[11] Most anthroposophic preparations are highly diluted akin to homeopathic remedies. This means that, while they are completely harmless in themselves, using them in place of conventional medicine to treat serious illness carries a risk of severe adverse consequences.[3]

As well as drug remedies, anthroposophical medicine also includes:[2]

  • Anthroposophic nursing
  • Counselling
  • Eurythmy – claimed to have an effect on "inner life functions" leading to a "re-integration of body, soul, and spirit".[9][25]
  • External applications
  • Rhythmic massages

Plant-derived treatments

[edit]

To select an anthroposophic substance for a particular illness, practitioners consider the source of the substances used. The character of a mineral, plant or animal is hypothesised to have been formed by the substances that are most active within it, in the belief that this character may also influence what the substance will accomplish when given to treat another organism. This is related to the doctrine of signatures. Willow, for example, is considered to have an unusual character:

... plants that grow near water are usually heavy, with big, dark green leaves that wilt and break easily. An exception is ... the white willow, a tree that always grows near water and loves light. However, unlike other "watery" plants, the willow has fine, almost dry leaves and looks very light ... Its branches are unbelievably tough. They are elastic and cannot be broken. They bend easily and form "joints" rather than break. These few signatures can give us the clue to what salix can be used for therapeutically: arthritis, deformation of joints, swollen joints ...[26]

There is no scientific evidence that the shape of plants has ever caused a new medical property to be discovered.[27]

Beliefs about human biology

[edit]

Steiner described the heart not as a pump but as a regulator of flow—such that the heartbeat itself can be distinguished from the circulation of blood.[8][28] Anthroposophic medicine claims the flow of blood of the circulatory system is, as Marinelli put it, "propelled with its own biological momentum, as can be seen in the embryo, and boosts itself with induced momenta from the heart".[8][29]

This view of the heart is not based on any scientific theory and has been characterized as "crank science".[28]

Steiner believed that the sex of a baby was determined at the moment of conception by the alignment of the stars.[30]

Steiner's model of anatomy was based on a three-part notion whereby the head is the "thinking part," the abdomen and limbs the "metabolic part," and the chest and heart a "rhythmic center".[30]

According to Dan Dugan, Steiner was challenged established science in the following ways:

  1. by supporting vitalism;
  2. by doubting germ theory;[31]
  3. by ignoring physiological systems;
  4. by hypothesizing that "the heart is not a pump".[32]

Reaction to COVID-19

[edit]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Steiner hospitals in Germany became notorious amongst healthcare authorities for forcing quack remedies on sedated hospital patients, some of whom were critically ill.[33] Remedies used included ginger poultices and homeopathic pellets claimed to contain the dust of shooting stars. Stefan Kluge, the director of intensive care medicine at Hamburg's University Medical Centre, said the claims of anthroposophic providers during the pandemic were "highly unprofessional" and that they "risk[ed] causing uncertainty among patients".[33]

Mistletoe treatment for cancer

[edit]
Mistletoe growing on a tree, showing white berries in medium close-up
Mistletoe – Steiner said that harvesting it when the planets were aligned would yield a cancer treatment.
See also: List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments

Rudolf Steiner conjectured that mistletoe could cure cancer on the basis of the observation that the plant was a parasite that eventually killed its host—a process he claimed paralleled the progression of cancer.[2] Steiner believed the plant's medical potential was influenced by the position of the sun, moon, and planets and that it was important to harvest the plant at the right time.[34] Some mistletoe preparations are ultra-diluted; others are made from fermented mistletoe.[2] The most commonly used trade names for mistletoe drugs are Iscador and Helixor.[4]

Although laboratory experiments have suggested that mistletoe extract may affect the immune system and be able to kill some kinds of cancer cells, there is little evidence of its benefit to people with cancer.[5][35] Most of the clinical research claiming that mistletoe therapy is effective is published in Germany, and it is generally considered unreliable because of major lapses in quality.[35][36] Edzard Ernst wrote that research by anthroposophic clinicians often reached positive conclusions on mistletoe therapy because it drew on unreliable material; independent researchers tended instead to find no evidence of benefit.[2] The American Cancer Society says that "available evidence from well-designed clinical trials does not support claims that mistletoe can improve length or quality of life".[4]

Mistletoe-based cancer drugs are widely used in Europe, especially in German-speaking countries.[36] In 2002, nearly half a million prescriptions were paid for by German health insurance, and in 2006 there were reportedly around 30 types of mistletoe extract on the market.[2][36] Mistletoe extracts have been used as an unconventional treatment for cancer patients in the Netherlands, and in Germany the treatment has been approved as palliative therapy to treat the symptoms of patients with malignant tumors.[4] In Sweden, controversially, mistletoe therapy has been approved for use in the treatment of cancer symptoms.[37]

In other countries, mistletoe therapy is virtually unknown.[36] The United States Food and Drug Administration has not approved mistletoe-based drugs for any purpose; mistletoe extracts may not be distributed in or imported to the U.S. except for research purposes.[35] As of 2015 no mistletoe-based drugs are licensed for use in the United Kingdom.[38]

A 2013 article on mistletoe in Lancet Oncology invoked Ben Goldacre's observation that a geographical preference for certain therapies was a hallmark of quackery, and proposed that the continuing use of this "apparently ineffectual therapy" in a small cluster of countries was based on sociological rather than medical reasons, indicating a need for a more informed consent from patients.[36]

Immunization

[edit]
See also: Vaccine hesitancy

The risks arising from using anthroposophical medicine as a substitute for evidence-based medicine are exemplified by several cases of low vaccination levels in Waldorf schools,[3] since some anthroposophical doctors oppose immunization.[6] A 1999 study of children in Sweden showed that in Waldorf schools, only 18% had received MMR vaccination, compared to a level of 93% in other schools nationally.[3]

A 2003 report of a widespread measles outbreak around Coburg, Germany, identified a Waldorf school as the origin.[3] At the time the town's mayor had condemned homeopathic doctors who had discouraged vaccination, saying "Their stronghold is the Waldorf School, which actively encourages people not to have their children vaccinated. Now we have an epidemic."[39]

Paul Offit wrote that Steiner believed vaccination "interferes with karmic development and the cycles of reincarnation", and that adherence to this belief led to a 2008 pertussis outbreak in a Californian Waldorf school, causing its temporary closure.[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Kienle, Gunver S.; Kiene, Helmut; Albonico, Hans Ulrich (2006). "Anthroposophische Medizin: Health Technology Assessment Bericht – Kurzfassung". Forschende Komplementärmedizin. 13 (2): 7–18. doi:10.1159/000093481. PMID 16883076. S2CID 72253140. teils ergänzend und teils ersetzend zur konventionellen Medizin Cited in Ernst, E (2008). "Anthroposophic medicine: A critical analysis". MMW Fortschritte der Medizin. 150 (Suppl 1): 1–6. PMID 18540325.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Ernst, E. (2006). "Mistletoe as a treatment for cancer". BMJ. 333 (7582): 1282–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.39055.493958.80. PMC 1761165. PMID 17185706.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Ernst, E (2008). "Anthroposophic medicine: A critical analysis". MMW Fortschritte der Medizin. 150 (Suppl 1): 1–6. PMID 18540325.
  4. ^ a b c d Russell J; Rovere A, eds. (2009). "Mistletoe". American Cancer Society Complete Guide to Complementary and Alternative Cancer Therapies (2nd ed.). American Cancer Society. pp. 424–428. ISBN 9780944235713. Available evidence from well-designed clinical trials does not support claims that mistletoe can improve length or quality of life.
  5. ^ a b Horneber MA, Bueschel G, Huber R, Linde K, Rostock M (2008). "Mistletoe therapy in oncology". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Systematic review). 2020 (2): CD003297. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003297.pub2. PMC 7144832. PMID 18425885. The review found that there was not enough evidence to reach clear conclusions about the effects on any of these outcomes and it is therefore not clear to what extent the application of mistletoe extracts translates into improved symptom control, enhanced tumour response or prolonged survival.
  6. ^ a b c Ernst, Edzard (March 2011). "Anthroposophy: A Risk Factor for Noncompliance With Measles Immunization". Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 30 (3): 187–189. doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e3182024274. PMID 21102363. Anthroposophic medicine was founded by Steiner and Ita Wegman in the early 20th century. Currently, it is being promoted as an extension of conventional medicine.
  7. ^ The Dynamic Heart and Circulation, ed. Craig Holdrege, AWSNA, 2002, p.145
  8. ^ a b c Marinelli, Ralph; Fuerst, Branko; van der Zee, Hoyte; McGinn, Andrew; Marinelli, William (1995). "The heart is not a pump: a refutation of the pressure propulsion premise of heart function" (PDF). Frontier Perspectives. 5 (1): 15–24. S2CID 53615222.
  9. ^ a b c Rawlings, Roger (23 July 2012). "Rudolf Steiner's Quackery". QuackWatch. Retrieved 10 September 2012.
  10. ^ a b Offit, Paul A. (2011). Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All. Basic Books. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-465-02356-1.
  11. ^ a b Dugan, Dan (2002-01-01). "Anthroposophy and Anthroposophical Medicine". In Michael Shermer (ed.). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-1-57607-653-8.
  12. ^ a b c Jump, Paul (11 May 2012). "Aberdeen decides against alternative medicine chair". Times Higher Education Supplement.
  13. ^ a b c d e McKie, Robin; Hartmann, Laura (29 April 2012). "Holistic unit will 'tarnish' Aberdeen University reputation". The Observer.
  14. ^ Gorski, David (14 March 2011). "A University of Michigan Medical School alumnus confronts anthroposophic medicine at his alma mater". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  15. ^ Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008). Trick Or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-06661-6.[page needed]
  16. ^ Asprem, Egil (2018). The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse, 1900-1939. SUNY series in Western Esoteric Traditions. State University of New York Press. p. 494. ISBN 978-1-4384-6992-8. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  17. ^ Al-Faruqi, Ismail Il Raji (1977). "Moral values in medicine and science". Biosciences Communications. 3 (1). S. Karger: 56–58. ISSN 0302-2781. Retrieved 15 March 2024. Medical science is Ahrimanic in that it treats the body solely as a mechanism, having no knowledge of or concern with the etheric structure, that invisible field of force and energy which all too often is found to be the seat of disease.
  18. ^ Lavender, Paul (2010). "Swiss Pioneers in Science and Medicine". Karger Gazette No 71. Archived from the original on 2021-11-30. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  19. ^ Engel, Peter B. (1961-07-01). "Rudolf Steiner's medical thinking and its relationship to homœopathy". British Homoeopathic Journal. 50 (3): 185–190. doi:10.1016/S0007-0785(61)80064-1. ISSN 0007-0785. S2CID 71971482.
  20. ^ Intveen, Andrea (2015-06-09). Edwards, Jane (ed.). "Rudolf Steiner and the development of Anthroposophical Music Therapy". Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199639755.013.3.
  21. ^ Lukas Clinic Archived June 30, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. Accessed 2007-12-26.
  22. ^ "Anthroposophic medicine in Germany". NAFKAM's website on the regulation of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in 39 European/EU countries. NAFKAM. 2012-12-31. Retrieved 2015-09-21.
  23. ^ Ernst, E (2010). "Anthroposophic Medicine". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 12: 66. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2007.tb04893.x.
  24. ^ a b c Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires (28 April 2023). "Rapport d'activité 2021" (PDF) (in French). pp. 72–74.
  25. ^ Heusser, Peter; Kienle, Gunver Sophia (2009). "Anthroposophic medicine, integrative oncology, and mistletoe therapy of cancer". In Abrams, Donald; Weil, Andrew (eds.). Integrative Oncology. Weil Integrative Medicine Library. Oxford University Press. p. 327. ISBN 978-0-19-988585-5.
  26. ^ Carroll, Robert Todd (21 May 2012). "Anthroposophic medicine". The Skeptics Dictionary. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  27. ^ Bennett, Bradley C. (2007). "Doctrine of Signatures: An Explanation of Medicinal Plant Discovery or Dissemination of Knowledge?". Economic Botany. 61 (3): 246–255. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[246:DOSAEO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 28292316.
  28. ^ a b Jarvis, William T. (15 January 2001). "Anthroposophical Medicine". Quackwatch.
  29. ^ Furst, Branko (2014). The Heart and Circulation. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4471-5277-4. OCLC 868250054.[page needed]
  30. ^ a b Jean-Marie Abgrall (1 January 2000). "Steiner's Heirs". Healing Or Stealing?: Medical Charlatans in the New Age. Algora Publishing. pp. 87–96. ISBN 978-1-892941-28-2.
  31. ^ Dugan, Dan (2002). Shermer, Michael; Linse, Pat (eds.). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. pp. 31–33. ISBN 978-1-57607-653-8. In physics, Steiner championed Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's color theory over Isaac Newton, and he called relativity "brilliant nonsense." In astronomy, he taught that the motions of the planets were caused by the relationships of the spiritual beings that inhabited them. In biology, he preached vitalism and doubted germ theory.
  32. ^ Dugan, Dan (2007). Flynn, Tom; Dawkins, Richard (eds.). The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus Books, Publishers. pp. 74–75. ISBN 9781615922802. Anthroposophical pseudoscience is easy to find in Waldorf schools. "Goethean science" is supposed to be based only on observation, without "dogmatic" theory. Because observations make no sense without a relationship to some hypothesis, students are subtly nudged in the direction of Steiner's explanations of the world. Typical departures from accepted science include the claim that Goethe refuted Newton's theory of color, Steiner's unique "threefold" systems in physiology, and the oft-repeated doctrine that "the heart is not a pump" (blood is said to move itself).
  33. ^ a b Oltermann P (10 January 2021). "Ginger root and meteorite dust: the Steiner 'Covid cures' offered in Germany". The Guardian.
  34. ^ James S. Olson (5 January 2005). Bathsheba's Breast: Women, Cancer, and History. JHU Press. p. 452. ISBN 978-0-8018-8064-3. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  35. ^ a b c "Questions and Answers About Mistletoe". National Cancer Institute. 24 March 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  36. ^ a b c d e de Giorgio A, Stebbing J (2013). "Mistletoe: for cancer or just for Christmas?". Lancet Oncol. 14 (13): 1264–5. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70560-6. PMID 24275128.
  37. ^ "Unique green light for anthroposophical drug", Svensk Farmaci
  38. ^ Johnson H (2 January 2015), What is the evidence for subcutaneous mistletoe extract in the treatment of cancer?, UK Medicines Information, archived from the original (doc) on 8 December 2015
  39. ^ Hall, Alan (6 March 2002). "Anti-vaccine town struck by measles epidemic". The Times. p. 3.

Further reading

[edit]

Books and journal articles

[edit]

Lectures by Rudolf Steiner

[edit]
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Anthroposophic medicine.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthroposophic_medicine&oldid=1250829383"