User talk:1970gemini

I have just removed a picture that you added to that page a couple of years ago. There were two reasons why I deleted it.

• Firstly, you had placed the picture in the introduction, but the picture was not about the bombing of Lubeck. It is a picture of a statue.
• Secondly, although the statue might be relevant in some way to the subject of the bombing, your caption didn't give any indication whatsoever of why the statue is, in fact, relevant! It is just a picture of a statue with the name of the artist and the name of the statue!

I don't come from Lubeck. I cannot be expected to guess why the statue is relevant.

In writing an encyclopedia, we (Wiki editors) need to remember, for every article, that the person reading it probably knows nothing about the subject. So the statue needs to be mentioned in the article, or else it needs to have a caption that describes the relevance. The picture has been placed on the talk page of the article, so you don't have to search, when you fix it. Amandajm (talk) 12:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not speak German.

I did not know that the statue is a memorial.

The caption does not inform the reader that the statue is a memorial.

The text does not inform the reader that the statue is a memorial.

The statue should not be first in the article, because the article is not about the statue. The statue should be placed at the end, in "aftermath" or some other section.

• Google translate

Ich spreche kein Deutsch.

Ich wusste nicht, dass die Statue ein Denkmal ist.

Die Beschriftung nicht informiert den Leser, dass die Statue ein Denkmal ist.

Der Text informiert nicht die Leser, dass die Statue ein Denkmal ist.

Die Statue sollte nicht first in dem Artikel sein, denn der Artikel ist nicht über die Statue. Die Statue sollte am Ende platziert werden, in "Aftermath" oder einem anderen Abschnitt.

Amandajm (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. If the statue is a memorial, it should go into the article.

But, what is the right caption?

Amandajm (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I have returned the picture to the article, already now.

I will add some information.

Amandajm (talk) 09:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have written a paragraph about the memorial statue, in the article, and I have used the reference which you gave me. Amandajm (talk) 12:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message.

The photos that I have uploaded are from the private collection of the Wartenbeg Trust. I received permission to access their collection and use for Wikipedia articles. However, the firm stipulated that the photos can't be adjusted or manipulated. They have to be left in their original state, the way the photographer intended. Thus manipulation of the photos is NOT permitted!! Also, the photo is not dirty, as you state! It is a 100 years old photo!!!!! It is beautiful and it well illustrates the subject. The photographer intended for it to be presented this way and you changing it, and making it "artificial" is wrong! Would you ever make changes to Mona Lisa? Personally, I love the photo and your changes completely destroy the image!

Best regards, Mariaflores1955 (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message and the very interesting information on the creator of the photograph... History is absolutely fascinating. I believe that Kurt v. M. is buried at Ehrenfriedhof in Lübeck...Best regards from London! Mariaflores1955 (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ukraine during World War I may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• before the annexation of the Austro-Hungarian lands of the [[West Ukrainian People's Republic]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry 4 that mistake. 1970gemini 09:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.204.208.44 (talk) [reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willy Rohr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GHQ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, did you add the information from Königlich preußisches Sturm-Bataillon Nr 5 (Rohr) : nach der Erinnerung aufgezeichnet unter Zuhilfenahme des Tagebuches von Oberstleutnant a. D. Rohr ? If so do you have a page reference I can add please. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. But the Chapter is called: Der Angriff auf Verdun (The attack on Verdun). Does it help? 1970gemini 12:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It might narrow it a bit, I've asked on AHF so fingers crossed. ThanksKeith-264 (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the better map but someone from Wiki Commons said that jpg is for photos, not maps and diagrams, which should be png. I've been labouriously converting all mine for ages now. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 12:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is fine - as long as we don't use *.tiff B-)1970gemini 14:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• .tiff  ? Keith-264 (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged Image File Format1970gemini 21:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see. If you have any more maps to illustrate things like Malmaison I'd be delighted to see them. Hope you liked the article too.Keith-264 (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1970gemini. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello- It would help if you could explain briefly in the caption of the image you added to Willy Rohr what that Sturm-Bataillon patch(?) is. And a bit more elaboration in your edit summaries would be appreciated as well. "Petitesse", even to those who know French, doesn't provide any useful info. Eric ^talk 14:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats qiet simple. It has been the sign which explains itself of his bataillon. Take a look this article. You see ST (Sturm) B (Bataillon) 5 (independent unit in the 5th prussian Army) Rohr (she has been named by Wilhelm II. with the name of his commander in 1WW). Without this unit there wouldnt exist any Stormtroopers in George Lucas Star-Wars. 1970gemini 16:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating. However, your observations here do not address the issue of informing readers of the article what the image is. We don't just throw pictures into articles with no context or explanation. Eric ^talk 00:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1970gemini. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1970gemini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1970gemini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]