Jump to content

Talk:Nora Samosir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Removal of unencyclopedic lists

The lists—without context or indication of importance (the citations for some list items do not serve this purpose) are unencyclopedic. Highlights, and indications of why they are highlights are appropriate for an article. This is not IMDb or IBDb. Bongomatic 07:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am IN THE PROCESS of sourcing the theater performance to critcal reviews of the work and her parts in it. PLEASE do not remove my work until I am finished and the sources are all in. Thank you. FURTHER, nearly all actors of note here on wiki have lists (albeit partial) to their works. A notable theater actress is no exception to that established protocol. I do not expect to leave them all, as that would be ridiculous, but a representative sample lends understanding to readers of the article, her work, and its notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Geez Bongo, the article has an {{inuse}} tag on it and is being actively edited - and you step in and delete a huge swath of stuff that the active editor may in fact be working on. Sheesh. At least I added an "n" and quietly de-orphaned the article (1 link only!). Sure, deletion can be constructive, but addition is better, though it's much more difficult. Give it a shot sometime. Franamax (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Simmer down, people. The {{inuse}} template had been added eleven hours before my edit. While I now see that my edit was shortly after one of MQS's, when I opened the article (before I clicked "edit"), there had been no changes to the article in about five hours—beyond the "use-by" date of {{inuse}}. Bongomatic 12:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aplogy accepted. Unlike some editors that do their improvements one by one by one by one by one, hitting save after each of dozens and dozens of minor edits, I am one who begins his edits, and hits "preview" over and over to assure visual quality, content and article flow to catch errors before finally hitting "save"... only because I remember the admonishment that mainspace is not the place for experimentation. With the number of aditional sources that appeared within seconds of the revert, you might understand that though underatandably difficult for a non-English subject, my searches were somewhat successful. This is my method to improve the project. Thank you for yourself being on top of my edits. It is reassuring to know I am being closely watched. No harm. No foul. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nora Samosir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs

There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]