User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2018/Jul

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Epicgenius. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The article Gowanus Canal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gowanus Canal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article World Trade Center station (PATH) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I have more sources for the rename processes, but it's too hot for me to put the energy right now into doing them.

Also, the italics look just so weird there. I'd probably go with quotation marks and regular text. Usually the lead only uses bold. Mitch32^{(My ambition is to hit .400 and talk 1.000.)} 22:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@Mitchazenia: I appreciate your edits to add the sources for the renaming. I have also just added quotations instead of italics. epicgenius (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick edits on the 63rd Street Lines article. While you were editing that, I was at the SAS CIC. I got some interesting info. The EA will come out in a few weeks, and the final design will arrive in 60-90 days. I learned more about the provisions, options evaluated, and that the MTA sees an extension to the Bronx as a priority. Nothing I can use here though.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. And thanks for the SAS update. I'm guessing everything that you saw at the CIC is either already on Wikipedia, or is not worthy of inclusion. I really hope the MTA reconsidered the idea of tearing down the entire tunnel around 116th Street, since it would probably be easier just to create two side platforms with no crossover. epicgenius (talk) 00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

That was evaluated, but it was determined that the side platforms would have extend past the bounds of the street above-Second Avenue. There are things I would want to mention, such as reduced cost by half a billion, to $6 billion, but I can't cite a conversation.

@Kew Gardens 613: $6 billion Well, that sucks. I wonder if they will have enough money for Phase 3, but I think this is better discussed elsewhere, like in person. epicgenius (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

On the new mta website, for which I am manually saving each link into the webarchive, I found new neighborhood maps for each station. These have similar titles and could possibly be inserted as an external link into every station article through a template. There are some errors such as the pelham parkway 5 stop in the Bronx, and the lack of a map for Van Cortlandt Park, but I contacted them about that.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kew Gardens 613: Thanks. This reminds me of this map of Elmhurst with an error. There isn't even a map for Elmhurst Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line). I hope they fix that. epicgenius (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

By the way, it looks like the Rockaway Park Shuttle and Franklin Avenue Shuttle got new S^R and S^F icons, according to https://new.mta.info/. I'm still trying to figure out how to create SVG files for these bullets. epicgenius (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Does the 5 train even go to Wakefield anymore? I noticed that an ip was removing all references to it in the 2 line template, but I couldn't find a mention of it in the latest timetable. Cards84664 (talk) 02:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Cards84664: I don't think so. It seems that even the limited rush trips have been canceled according to the 5 train timetable. epicgenius (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

The article World Trade Center station (PATH) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:World Trade Center station (PATH) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 00:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Lines
Express station local station river intersecting line connecting line

Since you do a pretty good job of policing the templates, I wanted to run this by you:
It seems that this → is the generally-accepted format for lines;

Services
interchange station other service Lines used by the Other services sharing tracks with the Unused lines, connections, or service patterns  S  Termini of services Cross-platform interchange Platforms on different levels

and → has been accepted for services. However, recently there appears to be some “style drift” occurring. (See Template:2 (New York City Subway service) for example), where bolding is being introduced, color-coding is being ignored, and excessive detail being added for other services. Your thoughts? Useddenim (talk) 00:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: Thanks for posting here. This reminds me, I should update the 2 template. It was correct up until June 24, when it did run to South Ferry & Dyre Ave. (So much for my policing skills... ) Otherwise, the templates you mentioned above are in the correct format. I suppose bolding the express stops is fine as long as it's mentioned on the official NYC subway map as an express stop. epicgenius (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

I guess I wasn't specific enough: C16sh (talk · contribs) was arbitrarily bolding only termini and ignoring other stops. Useddenim (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: There are several ways this can be addressed. If it's the terminus of that particular service, it could be bolded. Otherwise, it shouldn't be bolded. Alternatively, the bolding can be removed entirely, but I don't think it's ideal. epicgenius (talk) 12:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 19:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, you might remember me from your various GA reviews.

I am writing this to ask for advice on C (New York City Subway service). You are a fantastic editor and your work on NY articles are impressive. I want to nominate the C train to GA just like I am doing with the R (New York City Subway service). Any advice before I nominate the C train? (My goal is to get a featured topic of all subway services). AmericanAir88 (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@AmericanAir88: I'd be happy to help. The C train article, there might need to be a little expansion of the "Maintenance and rider issues" section. I guess you could add other sections, such as "Controversies" or "Improvements". (Based on the G (New York City Subway service) article, which is already a Good Article.)

Right now, I can't help all that much because I'm busy working over the summer. However, I could suggest that you work on the A (New York City Subway service) and F (New York City Subway service) articles next. Like the C and G trains , the F train and A train also have "full-line reviews, which were conducted by the MTA and can be used as sources. epicgenius (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Minetta Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Congestion pricing in New York City you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

It is [here http://web.mta.info/capital/sas_docs/ea_phase2.htm]. It was put up earlier today. This and ridership today. So much to do! Stay well. I started an internship earlier this week.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 02:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, and you too. Good luck on your internship. I guess we're both busy over the summer, but I'll try to find time to fit this in. (And also update the ridership, and the Staten Island express buses.) epicgenius (talk) 02:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Travis, Staten Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victory Boulevard

Westerleigh, Staten Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victory Boulevard

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milwaukee Bucks. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Congestion pricing in New York City you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Congestion pricing in New York City for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Minetta Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Minetta Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 20:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Casliber 00:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Q60 (New York City bus) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The article Q60 (New York City bus) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Q60 (New York City bus) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 01:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)