Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties, and editors at /Workshop, arbitrators may make proposals which are ready for voting. Arbitrators will vote for or against each provision, or they may abstain. Only items which are supported by an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision. Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature. For example, an arbitrator can state that their support vote for one provision only applies if another provision fails to pass (these are denoted as "first" and "second choice" votes). Only arbitrators and clerks may edit this page, but non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

For this case there are active arbitrators. Expression error: Missing operand for +. support or oppose votes are a majority.

Expression error: Unexpected mod operator

Majority reference

Abstentions	Support votes needed for majority

If observing editors notice any discrepancies between the arbitrators' tallies and the final decision or the #Implementation notes, you should post to the clerk talk page. Similarly, arbitrators may request clerk assistance via the same method, or via the clerks' mailing list.

Under no circumstances may this page be edited, except by members of the Arbitration Committee or the case Clerks. Please submit comment on the proposed decision to the talk page.

Arbitrators may place proposed motions affecting the case in this section for voting. Typical motions might be to close or dismiss a case without a full decision (a reason should normally be given), or to add an additional party (although this can also be done without a formal motion as long as the new party is on notice of the case). Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion. Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.

1) {text of proposed motion}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

A temporary injunction is a directive from the Arbitration Committee that parties to the case, or other editors notified of the injunction, do or refrain from doing something while the case is pending.

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

11) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

11) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

12) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

13) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year. Appeals of blocks may be made to the imposing administrator, and thereafter to arbitration enforcement, or to the Arbitration Committee. All blocks shall be logged in the appropriate section of the main case page. (Default provision: adopted by motion on 4 June 2012.)

Comments:

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

Proposals which pass

{Passing principles}

{Passing findings}

{Passing remedies}

{Passing enforcement provisions}

Proposals which do not pass

{Failing principles}

{Failing findings}

{Failing remedies}

{Failing enforcement provisions}

Important: Please ask the case clerk to author the implementation notes before initiating a motion to close, so that the final decision is clear.

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support"). 24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close. The Clerks will close the case either immediately, or 24 hours after the fourth net support vote has been cast, depending on whether the arbitrators have voted unanimously on the entirety of the case's proposed decision or not.

Support

Oppose

Comments